1 / 40

Farhan Mohamed Ali (W2-1) Jigar Vora (W2-2) Sonali Kapoor (W2-3) Avni Jhunjhunwala (W2-4)

Presentation 12 MAD MAC 525. Farhan Mohamed Ali (W2-1) Jigar Vora (W2-2) Sonali Kapoor (W2-3) Avni Jhunjhunwala (W2-4). W2. Design Manager: Zack Menegakis. 26 th April, 2006 Short Final Presentation. Project Objective:

sona
Télécharger la présentation

Farhan Mohamed Ali (W2-1) Jigar Vora (W2-2) Sonali Kapoor (W2-3) Avni Jhunjhunwala (W2-4)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presentation 12 MAD MAC 525 Farhan Mohamed Ali (W2-1)Jigar Vora (W2-2)Sonali Kapoor (W2-3)Avni Jhunjhunwala (W2-4) W2 Design Manager: Zack Menegakis 26th April, 2006 Short Final Presentation Project Objective: Design a crucial part of a GPU called the Multiply Accumulate Unit (MAC) which will revolutionize graphics.

  2. Agenda • Marketing (Jigar) • Project Description (Farhan) • Algorithmic Description (Farhan) • Design Process (Sonali) • Floorplan Evolution (Sonali) • Layout (Avni) • Design Specifications (Avni) • Conclusion (Jigar)

  3. MARKETING • Application of product: HDR rendering in gaming graphics • Why HDR? Used in games like Far Cry • Optimization for speed( chose this because of market) • Competition- if enter market, possible barriers to entry

  4. MAD MAC and HDR • What is HDR? • Show animation explaining concept

  5. MAD MAC and HDR • MAD MAC accelerates FP16 blending to enable true HDR graphics • What is HDR? • HDR = High Dynamic Range • Dynamic range is defined as the ratio of the largest value of a signal to the lowest measurable value • Dynamic range of luminance in real-world scenes can be 100,000 : 1 • With HDR rendering, pixel intensity are allowed to extend beyond [0..1] range of traditional graphics • Nature isn’t clamped to [0..1] and neither should CG • In lay terms: • Bright things can be really bright • Dark things can be really dark • And the details can be seen in both

  6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Multiply Accumulate unit (MAC) • Executes function AB+C on 16 bit floating point inputs. Inputs will be OpenEXR format. • Multiply and add in parallel to greatly speed up operation • Rounding is only performed only once so greater accuracy than individual multiply and add functions. • Also known as: • Fused Multiply Add (FMA) • Multiply Add (MAD/MADD) in graphics shader programs • Many applications benefit from a fast FMA • Graphics – HDR rendering, blending and shader ops • DSPs – computing vector dot-products in digital filters • Fast division, square root – eliminates extra hardware • Available in many newer CPUs and DSPs because it’s so cool • One ring (circuit) to rule them all!

  7. ALGORITHMIC DESCRIPTION • Step through entire process • Multiply and align occurs concurrently- always align C to A*B • Outputs go to adder, normalize, round, overflow checker and output register

  8. Block Diagram Input Input 16 Input 16 16 5 RegArray A RegArray B RegArray C 10 10 5 10 5 Multiplier Exp Calc Align 1 5 22 14 35 Control Logic & Sign Dtrmin Leading 0 Anticipator Adder/Subtractor 36 4 Normalize 14 1 5 Round Reg Y 1 10 5 15 16 Output 1 Ovf Checker

  9. IMPLEMENTATION • Implementation of each module- how and why we chose a particular method keeping in mind goal of speed( multiplier, adder)

  10. Design Decisions (contd.): • Multiplier Implementation • 11 x 11 Carry-Save Multiplier • Reasons: • Fast because it avoids having ripple carry in every stage • Enables Compact Layout

  11. Design Process • Verilog-> Schematic-> Layout • Behavioral -> Structural Verilog • Transistors/gates -> Full Schematic • Gate/Component Layout -> Top Level • Transistor Count fluctuated from 20,200 to 12,800 • Major design decisions • Decided against implementing denormal arithmetic because it would increase the complexity of the project beyond the scope of the class • Round performed only once at the end. • Picked nPass over Tgate in the normalize shifter • Adder: variable length carry select-> Han-Carlson binary tree adder

  12. VERIFICATION OF DESIGN Verilog Simulations ( show outputs) • Overview • How/Why it works • Behavioral/Structural Explain why we couldn’t get a high-level simulator and how we tested our verilog design.

  13. SCHEMATICS • Show schematics of major blocks: adder, multiplier, and top-level • HOW WE VERIFIED: analog simulation

  14. Top Level Schematic

  15. Multiplier Schematic

  16. Adder Schematic

  17. FLOORPLAN EVOLUTION • Initial floorplan • How it evolved (with animation)- why and how we changed it

  18. Main Floorplan Multiplier Reg A Reg C Exp Calc Reg B Align C Pipeline Reg Pipeline Reg Adder Ld Zero Pipeline Reg Round Normalize Reg Y

  19. Floorplan

  20. Full Chip Layout Exponent Multiplier Zero Align Adder O v f N o r m a l i z e R o u n d

  21. Pipelining • Initially planned 5-6 pipeline stages • Reduced to 4 pipeline stages – made possible by implementing fast carry lookahead adders in critical path modules (adder and multiplier)

  22. Pipelining Stages Reg C Multiplier Reg A Exp Calc Reg B Pipeline Reg Pipeline Reg Align C Pipeline Reg Pipeline Reg Adder Ld Zero Pipeline Reg Round Normalize Overflow checker Reg Y

  23. LAYOUT • Final Layout • Layout of large blocks such as multiplier, adder and normalize

  24. Layout Decisions • 3 standard cell heights • Uniform width vdd and ground rails • Wider vdd and ground rails in power hungry modules • Max of 8 flip flops per clock pulse generator • Metal directionality

  25. Multiplier Layout with pipelining

  26. Adder Layout

  27. Normalize Layout

  28. FINAL LAYOUT

  29. Design Specifications • Worst case delay = 2.25ns • Long buses are all buffered (not tested yet) • Estimated clocking speed = 400MHz • Height by width = 193.86 um * 301.545 um • Area = 58,458 um^2 • Aspect ratio = 1:1.55 • Total Transistor density = 0.22

  30. Layout densities • Active : 14.05% • Poly : 9.25% • Metal 1 : 33.89% • Metal 2 : 18.00% • Metal 3 : 14.99% • Metal 4 : 6.29%

  31. Layer Masks - Poly

  32. Layer Masks – Metal 1

  33. Layer Masks – Metal 2

  34. Layer Masks – Metal 3

  35. Layer Masks – Metal 4

  36. Conclusion • More marketing • Summarize chip functionality • Extending applications of chip

  37. Comments?

More Related