1 / 20

Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013

Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013. Agenda. Prior knowledge Act 82 The Framework The Rubrics. What do you know?. Define good instruction. Think…What do you know about Act 82. Pair…What does a partner think?

stacey
Télécharger la présentation

Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013

  2. Agenda • Prior knowledge • Act 82 • The Framework • The Rubrics

  3. What do you know? • Define good instruction. • Think…What do you know about Act 82. • Pair…What does a partner think? • Share…What are the generalizations.

  4. Act 82 – June 30, 2012 requires… • Multiple Measures of Teacher Effectiveness – 2013-14 • Observation/Evidence (50%) • Student Achievement (50%) • Multiple Measures of Non-Teaching Professional Employee Effectiveness – 2014-15 • Observation/Evidence (80%) • Student Performance (20%) • Multiple Measures of Principal Effectiveness – 2014-15 • Observation/Evidence (50%) • Student Performance (50%)

  5. School District Teachers Without Eligible PVAAS Score

  6. The Framework • Create a T chart. • Name the four domains. • Identify the 22 components.

  7. Specialist Effectiveness Educational Specialists Licensed Professionals

  8. Non-Teaching Professional Employee Effectiveness beginning in 2014-15 • Educational Specialists • Licensed Professionals – local decision • Individuals working under instructional certifications who do notprovide direct instruction to students 19

  9. Educational Specialists • Educational Specialists are defined in Pennsylvania School Code with the scope of their certificates and assignments described in Certification and Staffing Polices and Guidelines (CSPGs). • Currently CSPG 75 through 81 list the following specialist certifications: • Dental Hygienist • Elementary School Counselor • Home and School Visitor • Instructional Technology Specialist • Secondary School Counselor • School Nurse • School Psychologist • PDE is in the process of working with stakeholder groups from across the Commonwealth to revise the Danielson Framework for Teaching to reflect the specific roles and functions of the identified specialist groups

  10. Licensed Professionals • Given that many LEAs hire licensed professionals under teacher contracts who are not certificated as specialists under Pennsylvania School Code, PDE has made a decision to develop revised Danielson Framework for Teaching rubrics for the following roles: • Occupational Therapist • Physical Therapist • Social Workers • Behavior Analysts • Educational Interpreters • PDE is in the process of working with stakeholder groups from across the Commonwealth to revise the Danielson Framework for Teaching to reflect the specific roles and functions of the identified licensed professionals.

  11. Individuals working under instructional certifications who do not provide direct instruction to students • PDE has made the determination to classify individuals working under instructional certifications who do not provide direct instruction to students as non-teaching professionals as defined in Act 82. Given that they are working under an instructional certification they will be evaluated utilizing the Framework for Teaching. However, the observation component will constitute 80% and the multiple measures component will be 20% of professional’s evaluation. Additionally, they will not be evaluated under Act 82 until the fall of 2014. • Examples • IU TAC hired under a teacher contract • IU Consultants hired under a teacher contract • Instructional/Curriculum coaches • Special education case-managers • Program Coordinators • Itinerant Teachers

  12. Specialist Effectiveness Educational Specialists Licensed Professionals

  13. Non-Teaching Professional Employee Rating in 2014-15 

  14. What Leads to Teacher Growth(and student achievement)? Coaching or Rating?

  15. Danielson Framework 7

  16. Danielson Framework, Domain 3: Service Delivery

  17. Unpacking the Rubrics • Examine your assigned rubric. • Examine the four performance levels. • What are the characteristics of this performance level?

  18. Multiple Measures of Teacher Effectiveness – Observation/Evidence • Classroom observations by Principal/Supervisor, including evidence that demonstrates behaviors associated with improving student achievement: • Planning and preparation, including selecting standards-based lesson goals and designing effective instruction and assessment; • Environment, including establishing a culture for learning and appropriate classroom management techniques that maximize instructional time; • Service Delivery, including the use of research-based strategies which engage students in meaningful learning and utilize assessment results to make decisions abut student needs; and • Professional Development, including using systems for managing student data and communicating with student families

  19. Professional Development for Teachers • Teachscape Teacher Effectiveness Series is available to registered users of the PDE SAS Portal. • Online training and 2 Act 48 hours • PDE Non Teaching Professionals Page • Standards Aligned Systems • http://www.pdesas.org/Instruction/Frameworks

More Related