1 / 31

Application of Multifractals in WWW Traffic Characterization

Application of Multifractals in WWW Traffic Characterization. Marwan Krunz Department of Elect. & Comp. Eng. Broadband Networking Lab. University of Arizona http://www.ece.arizona.edu/~bnlab krunz@ece.arizona.edu. Presentation Outline. WWW Traffic Monofractals Versus Multifractals

stacia
Télécharger la présentation

Application of Multifractals in WWW Traffic Characterization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Application of Multifractals in WWW Traffic Characterization Marwan Krunz Department of Elect. & Comp. Eng. Broadband Networking Lab. University of Arizona http://www.ece.arizona.edu/~bnlab krunz@ece.arizona.edu

  2. Presentation Outline • WWW Traffic • Monofractals Versus Multifractals • Proposed Model • Simulation Results • Ongoing Research • Other BNL Projects

  3. C C C WWW Traffic • What do we mean by WWW traffic? • Sequence of requests for file objects at a server • Why do we want to model it? • Capacity planning & resource dimensioning • Design of caching & prefetching schemes • What traffic properties to capture? • Popularity • Temporal locality • Spatial locality Internet C C C Web server

  4. time A B A C B D A B A C B D A B A C B D A B A 1 3 3 4 4 3 2 stack distance string B A B A C B D A B C C C B A C B D D D D D D D A C C C Stack Temporal Locality • Closeness in time between references to the same object • Often measured using the stack distance string 2 2

  5. Temporal Locality (cont.) • Temporal locality is often represented by the marginal distribution of the stack distance string • Approximately lognormal • Sources of temporal locality: • “Long-term” popularity of objects • Temporal correlations between requests to same object

  6. Temporal Locality (cont.) • Need to differentiate between the two sources, since • Long-term popularity suggests the use of long-term frequency information in caching (LFU) • Temporal correlations suggest the use of short-term residency information in caching (LRU) • Solutions: • Have several, popularity-based stack-distance models • Use a scaled version of the stack distance string [Cherkasova & Ciardo, 2000] • Stack distances normalized by their mean stack distance

  7. Example – CLARKNET Trace Mean stack distance Popularity (# of requests)

  8. Spatial Locality • Correlations between requests to different files • Can be captured through the autocorrelation function (ACF) of the (scaled) stack distance string • Empirical ACF exhibits a slowly decaying behavior; an indication of long-range dependence (LRD)

  9. Example time A B F G E D A H B F E D 6 7 7  Stack distance: 6,7,7,…  high autocorrelation value at lag 1 of the stack distance string

  10. ACF – Calgary Trace

  11. How to Simultaneously Capture Temporal and Spatial Localities • Previous approach: Self-similar model (Crovella et al.) • Start with a F-ARIMA with a desired H-parameter • Transform the Gaussian distribution of the F-ARIMA process into a lognormal distribution • Problems: • H-parameter characterizes only the long-term correlation behavior • Transformation is nonlinear (hence, it does NOT preserve the overall structure of the ACF)

  12. Impact of Transformation Autocorrelations F-ARIMA (after transformation) F-ARIMA (before transformation) Real Lag (in stack distances)

  13. Monofractals (Self-Similarity) • Example from geometry: The Sierpinski gasket

  14. Self-similar traffic Poisson traffic Self-Similarity in Network Traffic

  15. Self-Similarity … More Formally • Consider a random process X = {X(t)} with mean , variance v, and ACF R(k), k = 0 , 1, … • Let X(m)be the aggregated process of X over non-overlapping blocks of length m • X is exactly self-similar with scaling factor 0 < H < 1 if

  16. ACF Lag Other Related Definitions • A process Y = {Y(t)} exhibits LRD if it is the derivative process of a self-similar process with H > 0.5 • Manifestations of LRD behavior: • ACF of Y decays hyperbolically • Spectral density obeys a power law near the origin: F()~c -, as  0 • vVariance of the sample mean decreases more slowly than the reciprocal of the sample size

  17. Multifractal Processes • Generalizations of self-similarity, where now the H parameter varies with scale • Wavelet construction of multifractals (Riedi et al.): • Discrete wavelet transform of sequence to be modeled Scale coefficient at scale J and time 2Jk Shifted and translated wavelet function Coarsest scale Shifted and translated scale function Wavelet coefficient at scale j and time 2jk

  18. M A1*M A2*M A3*A1*M A4*A1*M Multifractal Processes (cont.) • Multifractals can be generated using a semi-random cascades: Ai is a symmetric random variable If dependent  semi-random cascade

  19. Multifractal Wavelet Model • Trace = scale coefficients at the finest time scale • For the Haar transform, the scale and wavelet coefficients are: 2 1 4 7 Wavelet coefficient Scale coefficient 3/21/2 1/21/2 11/21/2 -3/21/2 14/2=7 -8/2=-4

  20. To generate synthetic data: • Scale coefficients at coarsest scale: U0,0 ~ N(E[U0,0],Var[U0,0]) • Synthetic trace is obtained from the scale coefficients at finest scale where Aj,k, k = 1,2,…, are iid symmetric rvs with mean zero. Let Aj be a generic r.v. having the same CDF as Aj,k Multifractal Wavelet Model (cont.)

  21. Multifractal Wavelet Model (cont.) • Autocorrelations are controlled through the energy at scale j, i.e., E[Wj2] • To produce a synthetic trace with a desired ACF, the parameter(s) of Aj is selected based on: • Problem: Need to compute E[Wj2] for all scales j  Large number of model parameters

  22. Modified Multifractal Model • Goal: Reduce the complexity of the original model • Outline of modified model: • Take Aj to be a triangular rv in the range[-cj, cj]for all j • Define the aggregated sequence {Xn(m) : n = 1, 2, …} • Relate E[(Xn(m))2] to E[Uj2] and, thus, to E[Aj2] • Aggregation level 2m represents the scale j-1 • Express cj-1 c(2m) in terms of E[(Xn(m))2] and E[(Xn(2m))2]

  23. Modified Multifractal Model (cont.) • Relate E[(Xn(m))2] to the mean (), variance (v), and ACF (k: k = 1,2,…) of the original trace: • Thus, cj,j = 1, 2, …,is expressed in terms of , v, and k: k = 1,2,… • For the ACF, we use the general form: • g(k) is taken to be k or log(k+1)  model is specified using 4 parameters

  24. Outline of Traffic Generation • Extract empirical (scaled) stack distances • Start with an empty stack (to avoid initial ordering problem) • Process trace in the reverse direction • Record stack depth only for objects already in the stack • Reverse the extracted stack distance string • Normalize stack distances by their empirical averages • Generate synthetic stack distance string • Compute parameters for multifractal model • Generate a synthetic (scaled) stack distance string • Scale back stack distances • Generate URL traces while enforcing popularity profile

  25. Scaled back synthetic stack distance string 2 3 4 4 3 4 2 3 C B D B D A A B A C B D A B A D A C B A C B D A B A C A C B C C B D A B C C B A A C B D A B A C B D D D D A C C D D D synthetic traffic Traffic Generation Example Trace length=12 popularity profile: frA=4/12 frB=4/12 frC=2/12 frD=2/12 B

  26. Simulation Results Real Multifractal model

  27. Simulation Results (cont.) Real Multifractal model

  28. Simulation Results (cont.)

  29. Ongoing & Future Work • Online traffic forecasting using multifractal model • Incorporation of traffic forecasting in design of prefetching strategies

  30. Modeling of Prefetching Systems • Goal: Provide a theoretical model to analyze the performance of generic prefetching systems • Limitations of existing works: • Many are mainly focused on the prediction aspect only • Performance is often studied via simulations under very specific setups (e.g., given network topology) • Few analytical models, but which are overly simplistic (e.g., ignore client behavior, TCP dynamics, etc.)

  31. Framework Client: ON/OFF source Should I only use thinking time for prefetching? Predictor: I suggest you prefetch documents: D1,D2,….,Dk since I think they will be requested soon with probabilities: P1, P2, …., Pk. One TCP connection for both, demand fetching and prefetching An access to a prefetched document moves the document to the local cache. This helps in Studying the performance of prefetching in isolation from caching. OR Two separate TCP connections Server Prefetching cache: Small portion of the local cache Local cache

More Related