1 / 8

He Who Pays The Piper Must Know The Tune

He Who Pays The Piper Must Know The Tune. Robin Hanson George Mason University. The Puzzle of Abstract Experts. Examples: History professor lecture on ancient Rome Newspaper article on event in distant land Doctor says how to avoid rare condition

Télécharger la présentation

He Who Pays The Piper Must Know The Tune

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. He Who Pays The Piper Must Know The Tune Robin Hanson George Mason University

  2. The Puzzle of Abstract Experts • Examples: • History professor lecture on ancient Rome • Newspaper article on event in distant land • Doctor says how to avoid rare condition • We almost never know if they are right when we reward or punish them! • So why would they work to be right?

  3. Previous Research • Heidhues & Lagerlöf 2003 (GEB) • 2 politicians, pick binary policy, get binary clue • 1 voter wants politician so policy = binary truth • Brandenburger & Polak 1996 (RJE) • N managers, pick binary policy, get binary clue • Trader sets stock to prob. policy = binary truth • In both, experts neglect clue for client prior • “neglect” allows partial reveal in mixed str. eq.

  4. Generalizing Those Results • In H&L B&P, if add choice to buy info at tiny cost • They never buy! - Only use info if indifferent on acts • I show that in general, experts never get more info than clients will have when rewarding experts, if • Experts not directly care about client topics or honesty • Info efforts are hidden and costly • Experts can coordinate • On focal info, includes client info, other dim. info is less/more • See previous expert acts, or two player zero sum game

  5. Heidhues & Lagerlöf 2003 (Use some if mix.)

  6. Brandenburger & Polak 1996 (Use some if mix.)

  7. A General Result

  8. Summary • Previous papers hinted: experts neglect info • Generalize: coordinating experts ignore info • Sharpens puzzle of abstract experts -- why would profs, press, docs work to be right? • Do they directly care? Can we observe effort? • Do we leverage rare cases we can check on? • Why do we let experts coordinate so much? • Do we not really care if experts know more?

More Related