1 / 5

Haijiang Zhang Department of Geology and Geophysics

Application of Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) Neural Networks in Identification and Picking P-wave arrival. Haijiang Zhang Department of Geology and Geophysics. ECE 539 Project Presentation.

Télécharger la présentation

Haijiang Zhang Department of Geology and Geophysics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Application of Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) Neural Networks in Identification and Picking P-wave arrival Haijiang Zhang Department of Geology and Geophysics ECE 539 Project Presentation

  2. P-wave arrival: characterized by a rapid change in the amplitude and/or the arrival of high-frequency energy. Quickly detecting and accurately picking the first-arrival of a P wave is of great importance in locating earthquakes and characterizing velocity structure. The prior study of ANN on seismic phase picking -Input (1) The absolute seismic data (Dai et al. 1997) (2) Different attributes such as planarity, polarization, etc. (Wang et al., 1997) -Output (1) Noise: 0 1 (2) P-wave arrival: 1 0 -Picking rule (1) A characteristic function is constructed from the ANN outputs. (2) P-wave arrival is chosen as some characteristic point. Introduction

  3. Configuration -30 inputs: 20th sample corresponding to P-wave arrival -2 outputs: corresponding to the noise and P-wave arrival -1 hidden layer: 5 nodes -Learning rate: 0.1, Momentum: 0.8 Results -Training set: including 18 P-wave arrival and noise segments -Classification rate: 94.5% -Testing set: including 58 P-wave arrival and noise segments -Classification rate: 82% MLP: Identification of the P-wave arrival

  4. The characteristic function The onset is chosen as a point whose value is greater than a threshold. But it is difficult to choose such a point!!! The first, the maximum, the middle?? Long term, mid-term and short term to improve the picking accuracy (Zhao et al., 1999) My strategy Use Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) picker to pick the onset MLP: Picking P-wave arrival

  5. Practical Application and conclusions • Application -The algorithm is tested on some seismograms from SAFOD. -90% P-wave arrivals are detected and picked. • Conclusions -It cannot discard spikes or glitches. -It is not very sensitive to S/N ratio -Comparing with former methods, this algorithm can pick the P-wave arrival more accurately (within 15ms)

More Related