1 / 7

R-6: Personal and Environmental Factors Influencing Community Living for People with Disabilities

R-6: Personal and Environmental Factors Influencing Community Living for People with Disabilities.

sukey
Télécharger la présentation

R-6: Personal and Environmental Factors Influencing Community Living for People with Disabilities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. R-6: Personal and Environmental Factors Influencing Community Living for People with Disabilities David B. Gray, PhDHolly Hollingsworth, PhDJessica Dashner, OTD OTR/LDisability And Community Participation Research Office (DACPRO)5232 Oakland Ave. St. Louis, MO 63110graydb@wusm.wustl.edu314-932-1026

  2. Blind or Low Vision Importance of Participation Very Unimportant Very Important

  3. Blind or Low Vision Satisfaction with Participation

  4. Blind/Low Vision Accessibility of Participation Site

  5. Levels of importance, satisfaction and accessibility vary by place where people participate Implications for Social Policy and Programs Local government officials could attend to those sites that are least accessible and most important when they budget for improvements in government buildings and for targeting enforcement of accessibility standards Area Chamber of Commerce could make local business aware of problems people with impairments report about participating at various sties Tourist organizations could alert attractions to the feedback they received on the physical and social receptivity of their sites.

  6. Participation & Environment using the SPARC for MD Office Visits Receptive Environment Receptive Direct Communication 0.70* E P r = 0.89* 0.83* Receptive Indirect Communication

  7. Implications for Social Policy and Programs Policy implication improvements are needed in language used and approach to people with limitations Model after the HIPPA required training for healthcare workers

More Related