1 / 9

A brief history…

Nature’s drag queens: how vegetation impacts aquatic flows † Marco Ghisalberti Centre for Water Research, University of Western Australia DIALOG VII SYMPOSIUM † formerly known as “Momentum and scalar transport in vegetated shear flows”. A brief history…. Velocity profile. Slope 1:10000

tacita
Télécharger la présentation

A brief history…

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nature’s drag queens: how vegetation impacts aquatic flows†Marco GhisalbertiCentre for Water Research,University of Western AustraliaDIALOG VII SYMPOSIUM†formerly known as “Momentum and scalar transport in vegetated shear flows”

  2. A brief history… Velocity profile Slope 1:10000 4% plant volume Vegetated • Current models fail to predict in-canopy: • Velocity profile • Vertical mixing Bare Mixing (taken from Defina and Bixio, Water Resour. Res., 2005) Diffusivity (m2/s)

  3. A brief history… Velocity profile Slope 1:10000 4% plant volume Vegetated • Current models fail to predict in-canopy: • Velocity profile • Vertical mixing “Model” Bare Mixing (taken from Defina and Bixio, Water Resour. Res., 2005) Diffusivity (m2/s)

  4. Questions that needed an answer WHAT’S GOING ON IN THESE FLOWS? • Why does the traditional treatment yield such poor results? HOW CAN WE CHARACTERIZE FLUXES OF NUTRIENTS/SEDIMENT/GASES? • Why the sharp mixing gradient? HOW CAN WE USE THIS PHYSICAL INSIGHT? • Can we develop a general, rather than canopy specific, framework? Understanding Prediction (taken from piscoweb.org)

  5. Experimental design Velocity meters (acoustic Doppler) Flow straightener H = 47 cm Flow Model vegetation (7 m) Cylinder array • Canopy defined by its: • height: h • drag coefficient: CD • density: a

  6. Salient hydrodynamic features: 1. The vortex • Vertical transport dominated by coherent vortex structures • Vortices generate strongly oscillatory flow and transport • Mixing is more rapid than above a flat bed Vertical transport High Canopy top Low Flow Flow

  7. Salient hydrodynamic features:2. Hydrodynamic stratification • Vortices separate the canopy into two distinct zones. • Upper zone: “Exchange zone” D ≈ 1/50 × vortex size × rotation ~O(10 cm2/s) • Lower zone: “Wake zone” D ≈ 1/400 × flow speed × stem diameter × % wakes. ~O(0.1―1 cm2/s) Velocity profile Exchange Wake

  8. Extrapolation to other vegetated flows de≈ 0.2/CDa (i.e. less penetration into dense, drag-exerting canopies) de/(CDa)-1 CDah Closed symbols – Cylinders in water (♦Ghisalberti and Nepf [2004], ● Vivoni [2000], ■ Dunn et al. [1996], ▲Tsujimoto et al. [1992]) Open symbols – Cylinders/strips in air (○ Seginer et al. [1976], D Raupach et al. [1996], ◊ Brunet et al. [1994])

  9. What do we understand ? What don’t we understand ? • To what extent does the hydrodynamics control the chemistry & biology? • Experiments have given us a much better idea of: - Residence times and vertical gradients of passive tracers in canopies. - Fluxes in/out of canopies - Brief but intense nature of mixing events. Flushing? z (m) [NH4+] (mM) • How does plant waving impact nutrient uptake & particle capture ?

More Related