1 / 13

The Functioning of NGO DRR Networks

The Functioning of NGO DRR Networks. BOND DRR Working Group & Afghan DRR Consortium Oenone Chadburn – Oct 06. Introduction. Two different national level DRR networks Developed and developing country contexts Both relatively new in undertaking activities Both have seen a role for Advocacy

tadhg
Télécharger la présentation

The Functioning of NGO DRR Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Functioning of NGO DRR Networks BOND DRR Working Group & Afghan DRR Consortium Oenone Chadburn – Oct 06

  2. Introduction • Two different national level DRR networks • Developed and developing country contexts • Both relatively new in undertaking activities • Both have seen a role for • Advocacy • Good Practise & Shared Learning • Co-ordination & Collaboration

  3. The BOND Network • Vision & Goals of British Overseas NGOs for Dev • UK's broadest network of voluntary organisations working in international development founded in 1993 • Aims to improve the UK's contribution to international development by promoting the exchange of experience, ideas and information www.bond.org.uk • Function & Role of BOND Working Groups • Thematically focused • Member-led and self-managed • Guidelines based on accessibility, transparency & accountability • Secretariat support provided by BOND

  4. Learning from Working Groups • Structure must be fit for purpose – don’t shoe horn your objectives into a structure • Clarity around representation (BOND, WG or individual sign up) • Potential of saturation of networks – research mapping of one issue and how many networks are dealing with it • Seasonality of availability and internal organisational demands of NGOs • Optimum time for meetings between 2-4 on Thursday afternoons!

  5. BOND DRR WG • ToR Objectives • Share information • Closer collaboration & co-ordination • Advance public policy on DRR • Co-ordinate Advocacy • Contribute towards the development & implementation of Hyogo • Structure • Separate Chair & Co-ordinator • Members meet formally 4 times a year • E-group to share information (over 100 on list)

  6. Areas Covered in 2005/6 • Review of Group ToR • ISDR Presentation on Hyogo • Relationships with other disaster related networks • Discussion on National Platform • VCA Tools • Climate Change & DRR • Review of TEC evaluation

  7. Sub Working Groups • DFID Sub-Working Group • Comprised of 6 agencies, all with grants from the DFID Conflict and Humanitarian Fund • Came together for co-ordination and debate on common implementation issues • Co-funding a joint consultancy on development of community based indicators for Hyogo • Principles in Recovery Working Group • Evolved from the TEC evaluation • To develop high level principles and their practical outworking, as well as explain key concepts

  8. BOND DRR WG - Added Value • Conceptual learning and sharing • Interaction between donors, academia and practitioners (members & associate members) • Debate and discussion on good practise • Sharing of VCA tools • Effective grassroots practise and case studies • Development of standards • Relationship between DDR and Climate Change Adaptation • Advocacy opportunities • Activities e.g. Community Research for Hyogo • Momentum on the “DRR debate”

  9. Afghan DRR Consortium • Thinking initiated from • Need for coordination • Support the facilitation of funding • Development Afghan national policy • Deliberately limited and strongly framed start • Desire to integrate local NGOs to ensure shared learning and the development of capacity, but issues of resources and politics • Strong links with ACBAR

  10. Consortium Objectives • Enhance information sharing • Advocate for the inclusion of DRR in development projects • Lobby governments and donors for funding to be channelled towards DRR • Collect and share best practise • Participation in the National Disaster Response Network • Capacity Building of NGOs and CBOs including training materials and the facilitation of workshops • Voice for the community

  11. DRR Consortium - Added Value • Potential for Impact • Strong recognition of the beneficiaries of the organisation and the different needs they have • Single independent voice and representation • Strict criteria for membership ensures common standards and commitment • Mapping trends, and contribution towards EWS and disaster response mechanisms • Early Issues • Recent UN external review on disaster mechanisms, there was no reference to the network

  12. Learning for the Consultation • BOND’s ongoing learning on the effectiveness and imporvement of NGO networks • Inclusiveness for all levels of NGOs & CBOs • Need for networks to be practically active • Use of NGOs networks to facilitate larger funding opportunities • Need for institutionalisation of networks and not ones that are based on individual strengths • Need to “market” networks to both other NGOs and other institutions/organisations • Responsibility not just to advocate but advance policy

  13. Conclusions • Initial favourable interest on behalf of the BOND DRR WG towards the development of a Global Network • DRR Consortium would favourably contribute to and receive from a Global Network Thank You

More Related