1 / 6

eGovernment Working Group

A long list of e-opportunities are the outcomes of the EC, EGWG, interviews, visioning sessions and best practices. Executive Council. eGovernment Working Group. Long list of Opportunities. Interviews. Visioning Sessions. Industry and Government Best Practice.

talli
Télécharger la présentation

eGovernment Working Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A long list of e-opportunities are the outcomes of the EC, EGWG, interviews, visioning sessions and best practices. Executive Council eGovernment Working Group Long list of Opportunities Interviews Visioning Sessions Industry and Government Best Practice

  2. These “long list” opportunities must be evaluated to develop a “short list.” Examples of “Long List” Opportunities Scoring Approach “Short List” • Create strong Internet presence for Ag in the Classroom, integrate with TV show, class materials, other media • Virtual trade shows • Kiosks available in USDA service centers with live chat capabilities • Provide training to business partners on how to use new eGovernment features and applications • Extranets for partners with data exchange capabilities • Portals for state and local governments to access data and links related to programs they help administer • Create integrated, standard Department-wide data collection and reports tool to eliminate redundant reporting • Enhance employee directory to include searchable information on skillset, project, expert qualifications, etc, and make Department-wide Weighting Unacceptable(0) Acceptable(3) Ideal (5) High Strategic • .. • .. “Short list” Scores for each opportunity Financial • .. • .. Ability to deliver/Liklihood of Implementation • .. Low Low High Strategic and financial score combined

  3. Sample scoring criteria USDA Sample Prioritization Criteria ILLUSTRATIVE Total Score1 Strategic Criteria Weighting (%) Score1 Rationale Better Fulfill Mission/Helps ImplementUSDA Strategic Plan/APP 100% 4 4 • XYZ.... Addresses legislative requirements 100% 5 5 • XYZ… Opportunity for USDA to demonstrate Leadership/create Government or Industry Best Practice/be “first mover” 100% 4 4 • XYZ... Cross Mission Area/Cross Agency 100% 5 5 • XYZ... Develop new or improve integrated products and services for USDA’s customers, business partners, employees 75% 4 3 • XYZ... Provides learning opportunities 75% 4 3 • XYZ... Overall Strategic Average 4 1 Scores of 1 to 5 with 5 being the highest/best score

  4. Sample scoring criteria USDA Sample Prioritization Criteria ILLUSTRATIVE Total Score1 Financial Criteria Weighting (%) Score1 Rationale Costs Lowered (increased efficiency and effectiveness) 100% 4 4 • XYZ.... Revenue Generated 100% 5 5 • XYZ… Estimated Funding Required 100% 4 4 • XYZ... 75% 4 3 • XYZ... Leverages existing funding/current budget/ investments Overall Financial Average 4 1 Scores of 1 to 5 with 5 being the highest/best score

  5. Sample scoring criteria USDA Sample Prioritization Criteria ILLUSTRATIVE Ability to Execute/ Likelihood to Implement Criteria Total Score1 Weighting (%) Score1 Rationale 100% 4 4 • XYZ.... Can be delivered quickly to create speed-to-value/ a “Quick Hit” 100% 3 3 • XYZ… Leverages core business capabilities Leverages current e-initiatives and e-infrastructure 100% 4 4 • XYZ... Level of Project/Program Office Support 100% 5 5 • XYZ... Transfer solution from other Government Agency or Private Sector 75% 4 3 • XYZ... Overall Execution/Likelihood Average 3.8 1 Scores of 1 to 5 with 5 being the highest/best score

  6. Quantitative scoring supported qualitative strategic choice Strategic/Financial Versus Ability to Deliver High (5) “Short list” opportunities Opp 1 Opp 6 Opp 5 Opp 7 Opp 2 Opp 4 Opp 9 Ability to deliver Opp 8 Opp 12 Opp 3 Opp 13 Opp 14 Low (2) Low (2) High (5) Strategic and financial attractiveness

More Related