1 / 11

LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES

LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES. A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels. Introduction. Aim of a framework for LCC’s: To facilitate comparison of results LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE Scale Degree Composition of intervention of intervention and relations

talon-carpenter
Télécharger la présentation

LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

  2. Introduction • Aim of a framework for LCC’s: To facilitate comparison of results LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE Scale Degree Composition of intervention of intervention and relations • The co-ordination of the PICT-project in Brussels is lead by Dag Boutsen, Annette Kuhk, Martijn Stellingwerff, Johan Verleye and Johan Verbeke, some of which are members of the CAAD-group Sint-Lucas.

  3. Topics of Discussion Kind of urban intervention Actors involved Composition and functioning of the LCC

  4. Comparison of cases Differences in: • Scale • Duration and phasing • Budget • Legal frame Sites of regional importance Neighbourhood contracts Urban regeneration Social development Expansion areas Densification

  5. Actors in the cases • Overview and classification • Co-ordination and hierarchies Table: Classification of political and societal actors, based on Howlett and Ramesh (1995, p. 52)

  6. Setup of LCC’s • Composition (cfr. actors in case) • Relations and positions • Tasks of the LCC • Timing Societal actors CITIZENS Voluntary groups Political actors PLANNERS Collaborative framework = LCC Entrepreneurs

  7. Composition of the LCC’s Distribution of: Age Gender Ethnicity Educational level Institutionalisation Professions Budgets etc. To compare conditions of LCC’s in different cases • Analysis of: • Degree of involvement at different stages of the project • Competencies in terms of use of ICT • Needs in terms of use of ICT

  8. Tasks of the LCC’s • Learning for PARTICIPATION facilitator for effective mediation between planners and clients • Innovative ICT training preparation and implementation LCC: Executive or developing?

  9. Brussels’ Real Life A matter of perspective! ‘Birds and Mice’ ‘Have and have nots’ ?

  10. What This Means • Power of LCC: development AND implementation • Smoothen the path for technological innovation in inclusive planning modes • Different design for urban developments?

  11. Next Steps • Brief survey on LCC’s and cases • Follow-up questionnaire on tasks and implementation of new ICT through the LCC’s • Concluding report on effectiveness and efficiency of LCC’s

More Related