1 / 19

Superclusters as future “island universes” – the case of Shapley

Superclusters as future “island universes” – the case of Shapley. Andreas Reisenegger PUC / ESO. Theory/simulations: Rolando Dünner (PUC) Andrés Meza (UChile/UNAB) Pablo A. Araya (Groningen). Observations: Hernán Quintana (PUC) Dominique Proust (Meudon) E. Rodrigo Carrasco (Gemini)

tamra
Télécharger la présentation

Superclusters as future “island universes” – the case of Shapley

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Superclusters as future “island universes” – the case of Shapley Andreas Reisenegger PUC / ESO Theory/simulations: Rolando Dünner (PUC) Andrés Meza (UChile/UNAB) Pablo A. Araya (Groningen) Observations: Hernán Quintana (PUC) Dominique Proust (Meudon) E. Rodrigo Carrasco (Gemini) + several others

  2. Outline • Superclusters, Shapley • Superclusters? • Future of structure in CDM cosmology • Spherical collapse, gravitational binding • Redshift-space appearance • Supercluster boundaries & masses • Future plans

  3. F 2MASS Galactic chart

  4. Shapley Supercluster: Redshift catalog of Proust et al. 2006

  5. Shapley Supercluster: Redshift catalog of Proust et al. 2006

  6. Superclusters? • What is a supercluster? • What are its boundaries? So far, definitions have been • Vague: agglomeration of galaxies or clusters, or • Arbitrary: some overdensity, or • Very technical: largest non-percolating structures. • NOT physical

  7. CDM Cosmology • Initially matter-dominated: • hierarchical growth of structure • up to clusters of galaxies (so far) • Now,  is taking over: • expansion accelerates! (supernovae) • bound structures separate from each other • structure formation stops Some structures are dense enough to locally dominate over , but not yet virialized • will collapse within the next Hubble time or so • largest bound structures in the Universe • physical definition of superclusters

  8. Pablo A. Araya, PhD Thesis (Groningen), in preparation

  9. Present (a=1) Distant future (a=100) Pablo A. Araya, PhD Thesis (Groningen), in preparation

  10. Spherical model • Equation of motion for a mass shell: • Analytical solution for the “critical” (marginally bound) shell: (Dünner et al. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 803)

  11. Spherical overdensity criterion vs. simulations 28% 72% 0.26% Dünner et al. 2006

  12. Radial velocity profile Dünner et al. 2006

  13. Real space vs. redshift space Dünner et al., submitted (astro-ph/0611435)

  14. Bound structures in redshift space • Radial velocity from: • true density profile (solid) • NFW density profile (dashed) • simulation (dots: bound=green, unbound=blue) Velocity envelopes derived through spherical collapse from density profiles of simulated structures Dünner et al., submitted (astro-ph/0611435)

  15. Redshift-space boundary • Shape is velocity envelope from: • True density profile (black, solid) • NFW profile + spherical collapse (dashed, red & green) • Calibrate redshift-space density through simulations to be able to fit to observed data Dünner et al., submitted (astro-ph/0611435)

  16. The boundaries of Shapley Dünner et al., in preparation

  17. Pablo A. Araya, PhD Thesis (Groningen), in preparation Supercluster masses Dünner et al., in preparation

  18. Near future • Verify spherical collapse model through Dn- distances to individual clusters in Shapley (Magellan proposal: Quintana, Reisenegger, Melnick, Selman, ...). • Claimed disagreement of predicted vs. observed supercluster mass function (Einasto et al. 2006): verify through redshift-space analysis of simulations vs. SDSS or 2dFGRS. • Improve & compare mass determination methods in simulations & in Shapley. • Center for the Exploration of Superclusters of Galaxies (CESGA): “Milenio” proposal, in 2nd round of evaluation.

More Related