1 / 19

Update on Data Standards Development in Geographic Information Systems

This update outlines the goals and progress of the Address Workgroup led by Charline Avey. Key objectives include developing data standards and appropriate schema, inventorying existing data, and identifying stakeholder needs. The workgroup will also focus on data transfer mechanisms, quality control, and the feasibility of crowd-sourced updates. The ongoing tasks include reviewing FGDC standards, assessing data delivery quality, and finding potential users for refined datasets. Participation in the workgroup is encouraged for those interested in contributing.

tanya-oconnor
Télécharger la présentation

Update on Data Standards Development in Geographic Information Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Charline Avey, Chair Streets & Address Workgroup Update

  2. Goals • Develop data standards and identify appropriate standards-based data schema. • Develop plans that include the following: • Inventory of existing data • Stakeholder data requirements • Data stewards • Costs • Work flow

  3. Goals • Data transfer mechanisms (with support of Data Integration Workgroup) • Update frequency • Maintenance frequency • Refine and maintain plans as necessary. • Develop metrics and review status of framework data implementation as input to the biennial report published by the State Geographic Information Officer.

  4. 2009 tasks • Review FGDC Standards • Under development by URISA, NENA, USPS, and the US Census • QA/QC review of Indiana Map County data deliveries • Explore the feasibility and methodology of "Crowd Sourced” Map Update

  5. Review Standards • FGDC 500 + attributes for identifying any type of address • Data Content • Data Classification • Data Quality • Data Exchange

  6. AddressAuthority AddressCollectionChoice AddressLifecycleStatus AddressNumber AddressNumberRange..CompleteAddressNumberHigh AddressNumberRange..CompleteAddressNumberLow CompleteAddressNumber CompleteStreetName PlaceStateZip StateName StreetName StreetNameDirectional StreetNameType TwoNumberAddressRange ZipCode ZipPlus4 Guidelines that meet our Requirenment

  7. QA/QC review • Develop quality Control criteria for Indiana Map contribution • Develop repair recommdations/ and or tools • Add

  8. "Crowd Sourced” Map Update • OpenStreetMap - http://www.openstreetmap.org • Google - http://www.google.com/mapmaker • ESRI Online http://resources.esri.com/arcgisonlineservices/

  9. The Comparison • Parcels have no address component • Street Centerline vs FGDC • Point Addresses vs FGDC

  10. Street Centerlines • Current Request • PERMANENT_IDENTIFIER • SOURCE_FEATUREID • SOURCE_DATASETID-shpdwn SOURCEID • SOURCE_DATADESC • SOURCE_ORIGINATOR-shpdwn ORIGIN • Data_Security • Distribution_Policy • LOADDATE-shpdwn LOADDATE • INTERSTATE • US_ROUTE • STATE_ROUTE • COUNTY_ROUTE • STCO_FIPSCODE

  11. Street Centerlines • Current Request • Road_Class • IsOneWay • OneWay_Direction • LOW_ADDRESS_LEFT -shpdwn ADDMIN_L • HIGH_ADDRESS_LEFT -shpdwn ADDMAX_L • LOW_ADDRESS_RIGHT -shpdwn ADDMIN_R • HIGH_ADDRESS_RIGHT -shpdwn ADDMAX_R • FULL_STREET_NAME -shpdwn STREET • ZIP_LEFT -shpdwn ZIPLEFT • ZIP_RIGHT -shpdwn ZIPRIGHT • CFCC_CODE • STREET_NAME_IDFK • LOAD_LIMITS • LANES • CURRENT_STATUS

  12. Street Centerlines • Data sharing requested additions • COUNTY_LEFT • COUNTY_RIGHT • CITY_LEFT • CITY_RIGHT • TOWNSHIP_LEFT • TOWNSHIP_RIGHT • TEMPLATE_TYPE • LIFECYCLESTATUS • OFFICIALSTATUS • USE_TYPE • ADDRESSQUALITYSTATUS

  13. Point Addresses • Current Request • PERMANENT_IDENTIFIER • SOURCE_FEATUREID • SOURCE_DATASETID • SOURCE_DATADESC • SOURCE_ORIGINATOR-shpdwn ORIGIN • DATA_SECURITY • DISTRIBUTION_POLICY • LOADDATE-shpdwn LOADDATE • LOCAL_ADDRESS_ID • FULL_ADDRESS-shpdwn ADDRESS • ADDRESS_NUMBER-shpdwn NUMBER • ADDRESS_SUFFIX-shpdwn SUFFIX • ADDRESS_TYPE • COLLECTIONMETHOD • ADDRESS_PREFIX-shpdwn PREFIX • ADDRESS_NAME-shpdwn STREET • ADDRESS_CITY-shpdwn CITY • ADDRESS_COUNTY-shpdwn COUNTY • STATE_NAME-shpdwn STATE • CURRENT_STATUS • ADDRESS_ZIP-shpdwn ZIPCODE

  14. Point Addresses • Current Request • PERMANENT_IDENTIFIER • SOURCE_FEATUREID • SOURCE_DATASETID • SOURCE_DATADESC • SOURCE_ORIGINATOR-shpdwn ORIGIN • DATA_SECURITY • DISTRIBUTION_POLICY • LOADDATE-shpdwn LOADDATE • LOCAL_ADDRESS_ID • FULL_ADDRESS-shpdwn ADDRESS • ADDRESS_NUMBER-shpdwn NUMBER • ADDRESS_SUFFIX-shpdwn SUFFIX • ADDRESS_TYPE • COLLECTIONMETHOD • ADDRESS_PREFIX-shpdwn PREFIX • ADDRESS_NAME-shpdwn STREET • ADDRESS_CITY-shpdwn CITY • ADDRESS_COUNTY-shpdwn COUNTY • STATE_NAME-shpdwn STATE • CURRENT_STATUS • ADDRESS_ZIP-shpdwn ZIPCODE

  15. Point Addresses • Data sharing requested additions • FULL_STREET_NAME • TEMPLATE_TYPE • LIFECYCLESTATUS • OFFICIALSTATUS • USE_TYPE • ADDRESSQUALITYSTATUS

  16. Data Sharing Current Quality • Centerline

  17. Data Sharing Current Quality • Point Addresses • Still to be reviewed

  18. Next Steps • Help sources fill in the blanks • Identify potential users of cleaned data • Request additional fields

  19. Join the Workgroup Put in your two cents

More Related