1 / 15

ASYMMETRIC THIN CURRENT SHEETS: A 1-D TEST PARTICLE MODEL AND COMPARISON WITH SW DATA

ASYMMETRIC THIN CURRENT SHEETS: A 1-D TEST PARTICLE MODEL AND COMPARISON WITH SW DATA. J. Chen 1 and R. A. Santoro 2 1 Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory 2 Lockheed Martin Management and Data System. The Second Workshop on Thin Current Sheets

taryn
Télécharger la présentation

ASYMMETRIC THIN CURRENT SHEETS: A 1-D TEST PARTICLE MODEL AND COMPARISON WITH SW DATA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ASYMMETRIC THIN CURRENT SHEETS: A 1-D TEST PARTICLE MODEL AND COMPARISON WITH SW DATA J. Chen1 and R. A. Santoro2 1Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory 2Lockheed Martin Management and Data System The Second Workshop on Thin Current Sheets 19—21 April 2004 University of Maryland

  2. COLLISIONLESS CURRENT SHEETS Observations of Collisionless Current Sheets • Extensively observed in the magnetosphere (also in laboratory) • Plasma and magnetic field data • Key new observations: CLUSTER • Model-data comparisons using magnetospheric data • But, no in situ data in the corona or astrophysical plasmas Objective: Construct a quantitative model of asymmetric collisionless current sheets and test it against solar wind data • Observational identifiers—magnetic field and plasma particle properties • Collilsionless but generally asymmetric

  3. Current Sheets in Space Plasmas Collisionless: Magnetotail current sheet observations: e.g., Fairfield [1984], McPherron et al. [1987], Mitchell et al. [1990], Lui et al. [1992], Sergeev et al. [1993], Asano et al. [2003] Thickness: “Thin” BASIC STRUCTURE

  4. MODELS AND PARAMETERS Symmetric Current Sheets • Analytic Harris model: [Harris, 1962] • magnetic field with Bn = 0 • Sharply peaked particle density: • Uniform average velocity in the current sheet • Important parameters: particle distributions of the asymptotic sources • Two basic regimes: • The form of f, in particular, the size of the high-energy tail; e.g., the distribution

  5. PREVIOUS WORK (1) The vD/vth > 1 Regime • Harris-like models: [e.g., Eastwood 1972, 1974; Francfort and Pellat 1976; Burkhart et al. 1992; Pritchett and Coroniti 1992] • magnetic field • Sharply peaked particle density

  6. PREVIOUS WORK (2) The vD/vth << 1 Regime [Holland and Chen 1993; Sitnov et al. 2000] • Current sheet properties—non-Harris-like • magnetic field • Particle density is nearly constant (10—20%) • Velocity is peaked in the current sheet • Pressure tensor is nondiagonal and anisotropic • Observed quiet-time magnetotail current sheet properties [McComas et al. 1986; Sergeev et al. 1993] • Magnetic field: • Particle density is nearly constant • Velocity is peaked in the current sheet • New work: Extend Holland and Chen [1993] to asymmetric current sheets

  7. MODEL: 1-D Asymmetric Thin Current Sheets IONS: Vlasov Equilibrium • Individual ion trajectories are calculated • Static magnetic (and electric) field with • Motion is nonintegrable: transient, stochastic, and integrable orbits • Ion contributions to J(x3), n(x3), V(x3)are calculated on a grid • Obtain new B(x3). Iterate until convergence. ELECTRONS: • Mass-less fluid equations • Momentum equation (me = 0) • Quasi-neutrality • Polytropic equation of state

  8. MODEL MODEL SPECIFICATION • Asymptotic source particle distributions • : both are -function distributions; n0,U • Parameters: Bn/Ba and Ti / Te for each asymptotic region MODEL OUTPUT • Converged B1(x3), J(x3), n(x3), T(x3), P(x3) • is satisfied

  9. MODEL RESULTS Demand that the solution satisfy specified n, T, V, and B.

  10. FORCE BALANCE: PRESSURE TENSOR Pressure tensor: nondiagonal and anisotropic inside the current sheet Anisotropic and nearly diagonal outside

  11. SOLAR WIND DATA Time resolution: 3 sec (diamonds). 0.044 sec (thin line)

  12. MODEL—DATA COMPARISON Model: lines. Data: diamonds

  13. MODE—DATA COMPARISON

  14. NONLOCAL NATURE • “Kinetic thinning” [Harold and Chen 1996] • Source distributions: Increase vD/vth, more field-aligned, increased high-energy tail in f thinner current sheets • Bifurcated current sheets • Increase asymmetry, , of the sources (this work) thinner current sheets • Increasing fraction of transient orbits [Chen and Palmadesso 1986]

  15. SUMMARY • Current sheet current: • For Te ~ Ti in the solar wind, J2e is ~50% of J2i. • It is possible to match both magnetic field and plasma data with good agreement • Force balance is satisfied in all three directions • Current sheets are not Harris-like: density is relatively flat, pressure tensor is nondiagonal inside the current sheet • Current sheet structure can be “remotely” determined via source distributions • A purely kinetic effect • Associated with increased flows, more field-line aligned distribution • Formation of bifurcated current sheets • Implications: anisotropic (ion) tearing mode can be strongly unstable [Chen and Palmadesso, 1984]

More Related