1 / 19

TASK 6: Estimation of climate change and land use contribution to past forest cover change

TASK 6: Estimation of climate change and land use contribution to past forest cover change Research aims: disentangling land use and climate effects for the past forest cover trajectories at different spatial and temporal scales Compare drivers in Swiss Alps and Polish Carpathians.

tate-battle
Télécharger la présentation

TASK 6: Estimation of climate change and land use contribution to past forest cover change

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TASK 6: Estimation of climate change and land use contribution to past forest cover change Research aims: • disentangling land use and climate effects for the past forest cover trajectories at different spatial and temporal scales • Compare drivers in Swiss Alps and Polish Carpathians

  2. Potential drivers Scaleofanalysis climate/ topography context 100m raster/30 m raster Target variable: Loss/gain (binary) • Administrative units • Communes • Districts Target variable: change in forest proportion (abs/rel) socioeconomics Test different combinationsofdrivers at different spatialresolutions

  3. Topographical Data

  4. Socio-economicdata – list of variables PL/CH • Not fullsetofvariables availablefor all periodsandstudyregions Selectionbased on hypothesis/availability

  5. Socio-economicdatabase • basic data: • shapefiles with cities and villagies boundaries (1850, 1931, 1970, 2011) • shapefiles with communesboundaries (1970, 2011) • socio-economic data: • tables with socio-economic data on level of cities and viligies (1850, 1931) • tables with socio-economic data on level of communes (1970, 2011)

  6. Socio-economicdatabase • Input data for models: shapefile with socio-economicinformation on „communes” level (1850, 1931, 1970s, 2011)

  7. Context Data • Contextual variables include information that are determined by their locatione.g.: • distance to existingforest (biological system) • distance to road/settlement (socio-economy)

  8. Climate Data Basic dataset(1931/1961-2010) Monthlytemperatureandprecipitationdownscaledto 100m resolution • Historical data (1850-1930/1960) • CH: Calculateanomaliesto multi-proxy historical time series; monthlytemperature (Luterbacher), seasonalprecipitation (seasonal,Pauling). • PL: anomalieshistorical time seriesKrakow • Spatial Interpolation (100m/90 m grid) Final data(1850-2010) Meanvaluesfortemperatureandprecipitation (periods same asforfcc) MeanannualDDsum

  9. Correlation coefficient values: TT Krakowvs TT Carpathian Stations in January (1961-2010)

  10. Analysis concept – CH/PL • analysisattwoscales: • Admin units (communities, districts) • 1 ha rastercells (CH) [~106 pixels], 30 m(PL) [~22*106 pixels] • General assumption: • climaticandtopographic variables play a role at smallerscales(pixels) whilesocio-economicsis relevant at larger scale (communes/districts) • Statistical approach: generalized linear regressionmodels (GLM)

  11. Drivers context climate/topo 1 ha raster (n=969’700) Target variable: forestloss/forestgain Administrative units Target variable: change in forestcoverproportion socioeconomics Test different combinationsat different scales

  12. Drivers offorestgain Model: GLM (binomial) stepwise, sample: 10’000 non- forestpixels at t1 Target variable: forestgain (yes/no) Explanatory variables: exposition (northeness/eastness), altitude, slope, distancetoforestedgeat 1st time step, distancetosettlement Adj D2

  13. Drivers offorestloss Model: GLM (binomial) stepwise, sample 10’000 forestpixels at t1 Target variable: forestgain (yes/no) Explanatory variables: exposition (northeness/eastness), altitude, slope, distancetoforestedgeat 1st time step, distancetosettlement Adj D2

  14. Explainingforestcoverbytopographyandpreviousforestcover? Model: GLM (binomial) stepwise, sample 10’000 of all pixels Target variable: forest (yes/no) Explanatory variables: exposition (northeness/eastness), altitude, slope, forestcover at previous time step Adj D2

  15. Problem ofspatialautocorrelation Examplemodellinggain 1850-1880 Sample size 10’000 -> 819 Model performance (Adj D2) 0.35 -> 0.3 Implementing 2 km distancethreshold

  16. Drivers context climate/topo 1 ha raster (n=969’700) Target variable: forestloss/forestgain Administrative units Target variable: change in forestcoverproportion socioeconomics Test different combinationsat different scales

  17. Appropriateadminunit? Forestcover vs. Population change ( relative changes 1940-2010) Communities (n=199) Districts (n=15) Forestcoverchange populationchange correlationwithproportionofolderpeople (60+) at districtlevel

  18. Altitudeandfcc in Poland

  19. Conclusionsand open questions • Approach allowsforcomparingspatialscales,periods. -> changingexplanatory power of variables/ setsof variables over time andspace • Sampling: all points, random, stratified, autocorrelation • Absolute vs. relative change (forestcover/socioecon variables) • Takingintoaccount lag effects?

More Related