140 likes | 260 Vues
This study evaluates the performance of GFS models in simulating low frequency atmospheric variability (LFV) by comparing two versions, GFS1 and GFS2. Using monthly data from AMIP-type runs (1949-2002), we investigate the variability in Z200 and precipitation patterns. Our analysis reveals significant differences attributed to a "bias" in tropical heating, which impacts the Pacific jet's eastward extension. Both models effectively generate realistic LFV patterns, although discrepancies in simulation outcomes can be explained by their differing radiation packages.
E N D
Low Frequency Atmospheric Variability in GFS Models Peitao Peng Acknowledgment: Bhaskar, Arun and Huug
Purposes • The performance of GFS models in simulating the low frequency variability (LFV) of the atmosphere; • Differences between the two versions of GFS models in LFV; • Dynamical interpretation of the differences.
Data Model: Monthly Z200 and Prate from the AMIP-type runs (1949-2002) with GFS1 and GFS2. (Note: the difference between GFS1 and GFS2 is that they uses different radiation packages) OBS: Monthly Z200 from NCEP reanalysis (1949-2002)
Mechanism: “bias” in tropical heating Pacific jet eastward extension LFV eastward shifting
Summary • Either version of the GFS models can generate very realistic LFV patterns. • Some differences in LFV patterns between the two models can be explained the “bias” in tropical heating.