1 / 25

Wildlife Considerations in Financing Wind Power

Wildlife Considerations in Financing Wind Power. Penny Jennings Eckert, Ph.D. Albuquerque, New Mexico July 2007. Tetra Tech Experience. Actively permitting projects in any state the wind is blowing!

tcarlson
Télécharger la présentation

Wildlife Considerations in Financing Wind Power

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wildlife Considerations in Financing Wind Power Penny Jennings Eckert, Ph.D. Albuquerque, New Mexico July 2007

  2. Tetra Tech Experience • Actively permitting projects in any state the wind is blowing! • Many permitting and engineering projects in the West (including California), the Midwest, and the East (including New York). • Also active in project construction (EPC)

  3. Why Wildlife Issues at all? • Collisions with turbines kill birds and bats • Collisions with transmission lines kill birds • Collision numbers vary geographically • Wildlife may avoid windfarms, further reducing habitat available • Installation of wind turbines and access roads can reduce or divide habitat • Regulating agencies worry

  4. Putting Avian Mortality in Perspective With Other Causes

  5. But the agencies still worry!

  6. Birds, Bats, and Bankers:Important questions: • Is permitting this project feasible? • How long will permitting take? • How much will permitting cost? • What role do wildlife issues play in permitting feasibility? • Will there be wildlife problems during operations?

  7. It Depends!

  8. Depends on…. • Is there a Federal nexus? • What are the State permitting rules? • Who else is watching (stakeholder groups)? • Who’s in the neighborhood (resident wildlife)? • Who passes through and when (migratory birds and bats)?

  9. Common Sources of Federal Nexus • Federally managed land? (BLM, National Forest, Military, Indian Reservation) • Substantial wetland or waterbody impact, either with project or with access and transmission? If yes then Army Corps of Engineers permit required. • Cross an Interstate with a transmission line? If yes then FHWA involvement

  10. Federal Nexus Brings…. • NEPA compliance • Consultation with USFWS on threatened and endangered species • USFWS active in protection of eagles and migratory birds, involved in NEPA • USFWS recommends THREE years of avian surveys prior to permitting • Section 7 consultation on T&E has a timeline of around 6 months

  11. State Permitting • Varies drastically from state to state • Federal-like rules in many states (e.g. CA, NY) • NO state permitting in some states (e.g. TX) • Intermediate permitting structures in most other states

  12. State Permitting Brings…. • Quasi-NEPA compliance • Involvement of state wildlife agencies • Often USFWS-like pre-permitting survey requirements • If serious concerns for T&E species, may require a Section 10 consultation with USFWS, which has no set timeline and can take 1-2 years to issue a “take” permit

  13. Stakeholder involvement brings… • More attention to • preconstruction surveys • analysis • Mitigation • Longer public involvement, possibly decision drag in agencies

  14. Who’s in the neighborhood, and who’s passing through?

  15. Wildlife Studies • Site-specific baseline studies + geographically similar case histories = predicted impacts • Impacts vary by location, location, and location

  16. Wildlife Studies • Pre-construction/siting • Initial “fatal flaw” analysis • Preconstruction surveys • During Construction • Compliance, micrositing, habitat avoidance • Post-construction • Fatality monitoring • Displacement studies

  17. Wildlife Baseline Studies • Preconstruction Surveys • Avian use surveys—resident, migrant—at least 1 year • Raptor nesting surveys • Habitat inventory and mapping • Bat habitat inventory and/or risk analysis • State Natural Heritage database/USFWS T&E species inquiries • Studies vary by state and geographic setting

  18. Additional Baseline Studies • Radar study of night migrants • Focused T&E species surveys where necessary • USFWS requests a MINIMUM of two full years of avian studies prior to permitting (USFWS 2003)

  19. Ideally…. Preconstruction Surveys Permit Conditions, including mitigation Permit Construction!

  20. Impact Mitigation Avoidance Minimization Compensation

  21. Avoidance • Site turbines, roads, or transmission lines “somewhere else” • Setbacks • Have biologist on site to assist with micrositing • Do not construct while animals are present • Operational limitations (last resort)

  22. Minimization • Reduce footprint • Reduce need for very wide roads by assembling cranes near installation site • Reduce working hours during critical periods

  23. Compensation • Expenditures on studies sometimes count • Post-construction mortality studies • Pre- and Post-construction habitat use and species presence/success studies • Contribution to other programs involved in habitat restoration • Conduct onsite restoration • Purchase of mitigation bank credits, where available • Purchase of offsite habitat for preservation • Management of offsite habitat “in perpetuity”

  24. Conclusions • Cost and schedule impact of wildlife studies varies by federal nexus presence, state rules, geography • Studies are conducted to determine risk • Risk can be mitigated (at a price) • USFWS and state wildlife agencies generally continue to work with wind proponents in non-enforcement roles

  25. Questions?

More Related