1 / 13

Power of Substitutes: Economics of Cross-Price Elasticities

Power of Substitutes: Economics of Cross-Price Elasticities. MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy. David J. Bryce. The Structure of Industries. Threat of new Entrants. Competitive Rivalry. Bargaining Power of Suppliers. Bargaining Power of Customers. Threat of Substitutes.

thais
Télécharger la présentation

Power of Substitutes: Economics of Cross-Price Elasticities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Power of Substitutes: Economics of Cross-Price Elasticities MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

  2. The Structure of Industries Threat of new Entrants Competitive Rivalry Bargaining Power of Suppliers Bargaining Power of Customers Threat of Substitutes From M. Porter, 1979, “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy”

  3. Demand and the Prices of Other Products • In addition to its own price, consumption of a good depends on other factors • Prices of other goods • Product quality • Income • Preferences • Advertising • Changes in these factors results in a “change in demand” – shift of the demand curve

  4. Changing Prices of Rival Products • Substitute goods – an increase (decrease) in the price of good X leads to an increase (decrease) in the consumption of good Y. • Complementary goods – an increase (decrease) in the price of good X leads to a decrease (increase) in the consumption of good Y.

  5. Substitute Goods Calculators (Y) When the price of good X falls, the consumption of substitute good Y also falls. Y1 Y2 X1 X2 Computers (X)

  6. Complementary Goods Software (Y) When the price of good X falls, the consumption of complementary good Y rises. Y1 Y2 X1 X2 Computers (X)

  7. Elasticity and the Power of Substitutes • Substitutes are defined by product function, not by product form • Substitutes have power to reduce prices when buyers have high cross-price elasticity between a firm’s product and substitute products • Close relative price/performance ratio • Consumer tastes & preferences favor substitute’s features • Low switching costs

  8. %DQx hQx,Py = %DPy Cross Price Elasticity of Demand • Cross-price elasticity gives the sensitivity of demand of good X to changes in the price of good Y • Cross-price elasticity of demand defines the strength of the relationship between X and Y • hQx,Py > 0: substitute products • - hQx,Py < 0: complementary products

  9. Strength of Substitutes and Complements • With strong substitutes, many customers will consume the substitute good if a firm raises its prices • Coke v. Pepsi – Suburban v. Expedition • With strong complements, many customers will reduce consumption of a firm’s product if price of the complement is raised • Personal computers and software • Hamburger buns and E-coli tainted hamburger

  10. MRS Defines the Strength of Substitutes Good Y • Marginal Rate of Substitution – the rate at which a consumer is willing to substitute one good for another and stay at the same satisfaction level. S3 S2 S1 Good X S3 > S2 >S1

  11. Willing to exchange perfect substitutes one-for-one, i.e., indifference curve has a slope of –1 Imperfect substitutes exchange at different rates Diminishing marginal satisfaction creates imperfect substitutes Strength of Substitutes Good Y Imperfect Substitutes Imperfect Substitutes Perfect Substitutes Good X

  12. Cross-Price Elasticity at AT&T • According to an FTC Report, AT&T’s cross price elasticity of demand for long distance services is 9.06 • If competitors reduced their prices by 4 percent, what would happen to the demand for AT&T services?

  13. Impact of AT&T Rivals’ Price Cuts • 9.0 is a high cross-price elasticity – customers are sensitive to rival prices so we would expect to see a loss of market share • 1% reduction in rival prices generates a 9.06% reduction in demand for AT&T services, so • 4% reduction in rivals prices generates a 36.24% reduction in demand for AT&T services • Stealing market share so easily tempts all firms to cut prices  substitutes have power over AT&T prices

More Related