Ground Support Network operations for the GRAS Radio Occultation Mission

1. Ground Support Network operations for the GRAS Radio Occultation Mission R. Zandbergen, the GRAS GSN team (ESOC) and the Metop GRAS team (EUMETSAT) 09/09/2011

2. GRAS GSN… • GNSS • Receiver for • Atmospheric • Sounding • Ground • Support • Network (on board Metop)

3. Sounding profile generation EUMETSAT will operate three Metop S/C (polar LEO) … and generate atmospheric sounding products in NRT … for delivery to Met Services within 2:15 (soon: 1:15) This processing requires precise orbits and clock solutions for both Metop and the occulting GPS satellite Metop POD to be performed in-house, using GRAS tracking GPS constellation through the zenith antenna The GPS products are considered ‘Support Data’, to be provided externally

4. Support data definition (NRT) GPS orbits (for Metop POD and occultation processing) GPS clock solutions Low-rate for Metop POD High-rate for occultation processing EOP data (for Metop POD) Auxiliary data (Meteo data, Nav. messages…) High-rate, selected, ground receiver data High-rate ground clock solutions(‘sounding support Data’) } for differenced processing

5. GRAS GSN High-Level Requirements • Commitment to operational data delivery • System availability of 99% on a 24/7 basis, with specific limitations on number and duration of outages • Near-Real Time capability compatible with Metop / GRAS timeliness requirements • NRT products initially required within 60 minutes after sounding observation (soon: 50 minutes) • “Moderate” accuracy requirements • System can be operated for up to 15 years, 2 satellites • Can be extended to other missions

6. High-level architecture

7. Dedicated receiver network ESOC plus three external network providers, built-in redundancy 46 sites, of which 25 ‘prime’ which is the minimum to guarantee meeting all requirements Data delivered in 15-minute batch files. Extension to real-time is an option (all providers have RT experience) Dedicated permanent lines between station providers and ESOC (ISDN backup) Each provider collects its own stations and delivers to ESOC

8. Station network (prime sites)

9. Operations concept • Fully automated system, error recovery by ‘retrial’ • Alarm generation in case of hardware failures, or product delivery interruption (watchdog software) • Operations team with on-call cell phones • Redundant hardware based on ESOC’s redundancy policy (physically separated data centres) • Orbit products based on predictions of a few hours (run every 3 hours) • Clock products based on clock determination tasks running every 15 minutes

10. Orbit and clock determination software System upgraded in July 2010 to use of state of the art GNSS software Napeos, replacing legacy software Immediate improvement in product accuracy Benefits from use in other projects (e.g. IGS) More flexibility for future upgrades Same software and standards used at EUMETSAT

11. GRAS GSN current status • System has been operational since first Metop launch (October 2006), meeting requirements • Atmospheric sounding profiles used in numerical weather forecasting, important for stabilising the solution in the upper atmosphere • Orbit software upgraded to state of the art (Napeos) in 2010, same S/W and standards used also in EUMETSAT • System more robust (e.g. independent of NANU’s) • Orbit typical RMS: 7 cm, clock sigma: 0.23 ns • Measured availability: 99.95 % over last 4 years • GRAS GSN contract extended twice, now until May 2014 NBS project presentation DLR 17-08-2011 | Page 11

12. GPS NRT orbit accuracy (cm)(impact of change to Napeos) GSN metric IGS metric 100 - 50 - - 10 - 5

13. GPS NRT clock accuracy (ns) RMS and standard deviation

14. Metop POD (batch system) Improvement due to introduction of Napeos (source: Y.Andres / EUMETSAT). Units are cm.

15. GRAS GSN vs. IGS ultra-rapids • “Why is GSN less accurate than (e.g.) the ESA IGS ultra-rapid solutions?” • Timeliness is 1 hour (GSN) vs. 5 hours (IGS) • Network size = 40 (GSN) vs 120 (IGS) • Old system (GSN) does not allow ambiguity fixing • No hard incentive to improve, as all the needs of Metop are covered (-> soft incentive) • Note that the ESA IGS availability does not meet the GSN requirements

16. Evolutions • Improve timeliness of NRT products from 60 to 45 minutes • Operational since mid September 2011 • In support of Antarctic dump facility and overall improvement of GRAS product timeliness • Orbit prediction accuracy improvements (implementation of techniques already used in other projects) • Tuning of ambiguity fixing

17. Navigation Bit Service • Implementation of a ‘Navigation Bit’ product delivery service • In support of raw sampling for low altitude occultation processing • Extension to other missions with similar requirements • Towards a real-time system • Technically feasible from GRAS GSN side • Data availibility issues

18. Existing solutions • For support to the COSMIC mission, UCAR has set up a ‘bitgrabber’ network • Consists of 6 receivers distributed globally, which record and deliver the navigation bits as data files • Coverage is not complete, H/W is ageing • GFZ have similarly deployed an increasing network of receivers • Coverage now over 90% • Product generated operationally, but only available off-line NBS project presentation DLR 17-08-2011 | Page 18

19. EUMETSAT implementation • EUMETSAT have requested ESOC to extend the GRAS GSN service with a NBS product • The method of generation should be similar to the existing GFZ system • The system should become operational and near-real time (45 minutes delay) • Availability requirements should be similar to the existing products • Global coverage w/ (mostly) triple multiplicity • Prototyping has begun, first data ~ Nov 2011, operations targeted for 2012 NBS project presentation DLR 17-08-2011 | Page 19