1 / 25

Life Cycle Assessment: History and Framework

Life Cycle Assessment: History and Framework. H. Scott Matthews Civil and Environmental Engineering Carnegie Mellon University. Course Comments. Brief (re)-Intros Projects Intended to help you start practicing Will summarize, not repeat, what is found in readings

tierra
Télécharger la présentation

Life Cycle Assessment: History and Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Life Cycle Assessment:History and Framework H. Scott Matthews Civil and Environmental Engineering Carnegie Mellon University

  2. Course Comments • Brief (re)-Intros • Projects • Intended to help you start practicing • Will summarize, not repeat, what is found in readings • Make sure you know ‘definitions’ from ISO documents

  3. Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) • A concept and methodology to evaluate the environmental effects of a product or activity holistically, by analyzing the whole life cycle of a particular product, process, or activity (U.S. EPA, 1993). • LCA studies analyze the environmental aspects and potential impacts throughout a product's life cycle (e.g., cradle-to-grave) from raw material acquisition through production, use and disposal (ISO).

  4. LCA Uses • Process analysis • Material selection • Product evaluation • Product comparison • Policy-making • Measuring performance • Marketing

  5. Components of LCA -3 or 4 I’s • Inventory • Impact Assessment • Interpretation (and Improvement) • We’ll do a lot with #1, then #2, and come back to #2 at end of course • Regardless, need to learn terminology first before doing anything else..

  6. Components and Criteria • Criteria: • Spatial, Temporal • Design • Functional unit • Significance/magnitude • Uncertainty • ISO documents a framework (not a recipe); LCAs may or may not consider all points above

  7. Criticisms / Limitations • Data reliability and quality is questionable. • Models based on assumptions. • Problem boundaries are arbitrary. • Scale issues - global -> local, etc. • Uncertainty is everywhere • Spatial and temporal issues • Comparisons between studies difficult • No single, accepted method

  8. Important Note on Context • LCA should be one part of a broad environmental assessment • If comparing with LCA, all assumptions and methods should be consistent • Especially problematic for validating against external studies

  9. Definitions • Big set of definitions in ISO framework documents (e.g., p.1 of ISO 14040) • Won’t review all of them here, but you need to know them. • Big ones to know are unit process, elementary flows, inputs, outputs

  10. Definitions • Elementary flows - material or energy entering or leaving the system, directly to/from the environment, without human transformation • Unit process - smallest portion of a product being studied for which LCI data available • Inputs / Outputs - materials or energy entering or leaving a unit process

  11. Scope Considerations • Setting all the parameters for study • e.g., functional unit, boundaries, data, etc. • Whether it will be critically reviewed • May be iterative (update in progress) • Supports product system diagram • Realize LCA can be used for ‘products’, ‘processes’, ‘systems’, etc. • Functional unit definition ensures unit consistency for validation and comparison

  12. Product Systems • Collections of unit processes, elementary flows, and product flows • Also shows system boundary • Processes, flows maybe in / out of bounds • In: fuel, energy, materials, … • Out: emissions, waste, …

  13. Simple Example - Tree Sunlight O2 Environ- ment Energy System? CO2 Tree Water Wood If we wanted to do a life cycle inventory of a tree, we could draw the boundary in one of several places

  14. More Complex Example • We manufacture a part for new automobiles and ship it in cardboard boxes • Currently, we “ship and forget it” • Generates significant box waste • We want to reduce waste - how? • What are tradeoffs?

  15. Original System Cardboard Manuf. Energy Raw Mats, Energy Energy Unboxed Part Boxed Part Part Manufacture System Transport/ Delivery Car Assembly Packaging Emissions, Waste Emissions, Cardboard Box Waste

  16. Packaging Takeback System Energy Cardboard Manuf. Reused Box Transp/ Logistics Emissions Part Manuf. System Packaging Empty Box Transport/ Delivery Car Assembly Unboxed Part Emissions, (Less?) Cardboard Waste

  17. Packaging Takeback System • Our new system uses less cardboard • Thus less waste, manufacturing impacts • But uses more transportation to retrieve used boxes • Thus more energy use, emissions • Unclear whether this tradeoff is beneficial • Perfect application for LCI/LCA

  18. Example Goal/Scope • Goal: “To determine whether the new system is better than the old” • More detail: which inventory items? How to assess? • Maybe air emissions, energy use, waste generated • Would a better goal originally have been to do LCA of old system and suggest improvements? • Scope: Fairly detailed description of both systems, items in/out of boundaries • e.g., might exclude impacts of product (relevant?) • But include packaging/logistics/reuse of systems

  19. Next Step: Inventory • In general, just “good research” • “Look up the data, add it up” • However, data availability varies widely • Consider inputs, outputs of interest • In: energy, resources, etc. • Out: emissions, waste, etc. • Also may be iterative • Allocation an issue

  20. Inventory Process • Iterative • Collect/validate • Matching data with unit processes/ functional units/etc • See “sample forms” on pp.16-20 of ISO 14041 PDF.

  21. Allocation • Hard to assign “one to one” linkages between units and inputs-outputs • Need standard/specified way to distribute (allocate) them • mass balance method • Physical properties • Economic value ratio? • What allocations needed for packaging takeback system?

  22. Inventory Interpretation • How do results fit goal/scope? • Assessment of data quality • Sensitivity analysis on inputs/outputs

  23. Data Sheet Exercise • Break into small groups (2-3 max) • Using samples provided (from ISO 14041) summarize data for: • Getting to school • Doing a homework assignment / writing a paper • Reading a book chapter • Something else similar

  24. Impact Assessment • We’ll come back to this later in course • Classification • Characterization • Weighting (e.g. taking an inventory of various toxics, then weighted by toxicity) • Assumed that existing weighting methods can be used (not developed as part of LCA)

  25. Resources • Don’t despair, you do not need to collect all of your own data for LCAs, for example: • US NREL LCI Database (various): http://www.nrel.gov/lci/ • BEES (construction materials): http://www.bfrl.nist.gov/oae/software/bees.html • Slightly ahead of schedule in content, but you should look at these for ideas before finalizing ideas and scope for Course Project

More Related