260 likes | 383 Vues
An insider ’ s guide to publishing JMBE curriculum articles. Jean A. Cardinale , Alfred University Curriculum Editor, Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education. Have you previously published teaching-related material or a curricular activity? If yes, where?.
E N D
An insider’s guide to publishing JMBE curriculum articles Jean A. Cardinale,Alfred University Curriculum Editor, Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
Have you previously published teaching-related material or a curricular activity? If yes, where? Please type response in chat window
Today’s goals: At the end of today’s session, you will: • Know the purpose of JMBE curriculum articles, • Know the required components needed for acceptance, • Be empowered to follow through and get that resource published!
Outline • JMBE overview • A walk through of the submission and review process • The nuts and bolts of good curricular articles • Common problems to keep in mind
Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education • The journal's mission is to: • Promote good pedagogy and design, • Foster scholarly teaching, and • Advance biology education research.
Unique features of the journal: • Open source, electronic content • Rigorous peer review • Volunteer driven • Guidance during review process
Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education (2.0) consists of: • Research • Perspectives • Curriculum • Departments: • Tips and Tools • Reviews • News • Letters to the Editor Assessment Research (More) Curriculum Tips and Tools (Less)
What are Curriculum articles? • Innovative classroom activities and laboratory exercises for undergraduates • Actively engage students • Have well written learning objectives • Field tested • Include detailed instructions & support materials • Contain modifications and extensions • Open submission, indexed, peer reviewed
What happens after you press ‘submit’? • Editor reviews for scope • Assigns section editor (SE) • SE assigns reviewers, oversees review • Approximately 6 weeks • SE notifies Editor, Editor makes decision and notifies author • Accept as is • Revision requested • Revise and resubmit • Reject
What do good curricular articles have in common?Type your responses into the chat box
What’s needed in an article? General layout • Organization • 4 Main sections: Abstract, Introduction, Procedure, Discussion • References • Supplementary material • 4000 word maximum • Image formatting instructions and other “incidentals”
What’s needed in an article? Introduction • Rational for design • Background information • Includes subsections: • Intended audience • Learning time • Prerequisite student knowledge • Learning objectives
What’s needed in an article? Procedure • Includes all information that allows adopting instructors to adapt and run the activity • Includes subsections: • Materials • Student instructions and faculty instructions • Suggestions for determining student learning • Sample data • Safety issues
What’s needed in an article? Discussion • Highlight effectiveness and provide evidence of student learning • Includes subsections: • Field testing • Evidence of student learning • Potential modifications
How do I provide “evidence of student learning”? • How do you know what your students know? • Previously used evidence: • Pre-post testing • Average scores on rubric criteria for assignments • Outcomes on exam questions • % completion of activities/components
“My students loved this activity, and when surveyed, they reported that it really helped them learn about x, y, and z.”
What’s needed in an article? Supplemental material • Student ready handouts/instructions • Detailed faculty support materials • Powerpoints or other instructional material • Surveys, quizzes • Grading rubrics and keys
Thinking about common problems… • Remember: review decisions are: • Accept as is • Revision required • (minor revisions) • Revise and resubmit • (major revisions) • Reject
What do you think would result is a review decision of “reject”? Type your responses in the chat box
What do you think are common revision requests? Type your responses in the chat box
Common problems: • Learning objectives are poorly written • Evidence of student learning is not provided • Results of field testing are not included • Activity is not novel, or closely duplicates a previously published activity • Abstract is not concise or comprehensive • Expected outcomes are not provided • Safety issues are not addressed • Activity does not allow active learning (i.e., it is a ‘cookbook’ exercise) • Article needs to be proofread • Article missing key elements (instructions not followed)
Final thoughts: • Follow instructions for authors • Reviewing is a great way to learn the process • Don’t be discouraged by requests for revision • Advocate for recognition of educational publications • And…
Follow-up assignment: • Identify an activity you could submit to JMBE Curriculum • Write a short paragraph describing your activity • Draft the learning objectives for this activity, and identify tools that you could used to provide evidence of student learning across those objectives