1 / 32

Muon Tracking Resolution Optimization Study for High Energy Physics Experiment

This study focuses on optimizing the position resolution of muon tracking in high-energy physics experiments through an analysis of resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, and gain settings. It includes data from Run12 Muon Tracking Resolution scan executed in February 2012 with 200GeV Proton-Proton Argon-CO2-CF4 gas mixture. The analysis compares Run9 and Run12 data, showcasing discrepancies in gain settings and noise reduction strategies. The study proposes new high-voltage settings to achieve the desired resolution goals. Various landau fits and gap-by-gap analyses are presented for both North and South arms. Pedestal distributions, noise levels, and gain adjustments are discussed to improve tracking performance.

tivona
Télécharger la présentation

Muon Tracking Resolution Optimization Study for High Energy Physics Experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Run12 MuTR HV Optimization RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa

  2. ADC Distribution Landau Distribution Most Probable Value (MPV) Of Minimum Ionization Particle (MIP)

  3. Resolution vs. S/N Relation Resolution N/S Goal : Getting Position Resolution of 100 ~ 150 mm! Reduce Noise (Pedestal RMS) Increase Signal -> Increase Gain (HV, Gas)

  4. Run12 MuTR HV Scan Executed Feb. 14, 2012. 200GeV pp Ar : CO2 : CF4 = 52 : 29.4 : 18.6 (analysis result from Atlantic Analysis Lab. March,7,2012) ADTX : LV on (-20 ADC channel in MIP)

  5. HV Scan Conditions • Run9 vs. Run12 • North should be +20% increase in ADC channel • South should be similar gain.

  6. North Gain Comparison DADC=p0+p1*DV+p2**DV No advantage seen for +2% increase of Ar gas MPV [ADC channel]

  7. South Gain Comparison -20ch for Run12 Due to ADTX on Overall, MuTR Gain seems lower than that of Run11

  8. North Arm

  9. North Station-1 Landau Fit

  10. North Station-2 Landau Fit

  11. North Station-3 Landau Fit

  12. North 200GeV pp Gap-by-Gap MPV HV setting : -25V of Run11 500GeV ppHV setting Gap-2 Station-1 Gap-3 Gap-1 Oct-1 Oct-2 Oct-3 Oct-4 Station-2 Station-3

  13. North Run11 Gain vs. Run12 200GeV pp

  14. North St-1 Pedestal Distribution (Oct.17,2011) Plane-3 Plane-1 Plane-2 Plane-6 Plane-4 Plane-5 Oct.1 Oct.2 Oct.3 Oct.4 Ground cables Oct.5 Oct.6 Oct.7 Oct.8 Noise Level is Significantly Improved, by fixing anode ground cables.

  15. Plane Averaged North Pedestals for Run12 Station-1 Pedestal Level = 1.5 ~ 2.5 Station-2 Pedestal RMS [ADC channel] Station-3

  16. Additional HV to achieve N/S=1.3% Additional DV to Achieve N/S => 1.3%

  17. South Arm

  18. South Station-1 Landau Fit

  19. South Station-2 Landau Fit

  20. South Station-3 Landau Fit Low Gain

  21. South 200GeV pp Gap-by-Gap MPV HV setting : -25V of Run11 500GeV ppHV setting Gap-2 Station-1 Gap-3 Gap-1 Oct-1 Oct-2 Oct-3 Oct-4 Station-2 Station-3 Low gain

  22. South Run11 MPV vs. Run12 200GeV-pp Low gain from past

  23. South Pedestal RMS Run12 Station-1 Average ~ 2 ADC channels Pedestal RMS [ADC Channel] Station-2 Station-3

  24. South Noise/Signal Ratio @ Run12 200GeV pp Pedestal RMS / MPV [%]

  25. South Additional +DV for N/S=1.3% Additional DV to Achieve N/S => 1.3%

  26. Proposed HV Setting

  27. Backup Slides

  28. Run9 vs. Run11 for Same HV Setting

  29. Run11 Gas Ratio Change Minor only a few % Gain change. Unit:%

  30. North Gain before/after Ar Increase Green:after, 4/9, 1020mbar Red:before, 3/17, 1017mbar

  31. South Gain before/after Ar Increase

  32. Gain Change (Station Averaged) About 20% gain increase was observed.

More Related