1 / 61

L ocal endogenous development and urban regeneration of small alpine towns

A trans-national project co-financed by ERDF funding in the framework of INTERREG IIIB Alpine Space Programme. ‘. L ocal endogenous development and urban regeneration of small alpine towns. ’. PROJECT PARTNERS MEETING. 9- 10 May 2005. hosted by.

tjack
Télécharger la présentation

L ocal endogenous development and urban regeneration of small alpine towns

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A trans-national project co-financed by ERDF funding in the framework of INTERREG IIIB Alpine Space Programme ‘ Local endogenous development and urban regeneration of small alpine towns ’ PROJECT PARTNERS MEETING 9- 10 May 2005 hosted by KURHAUS GRAINAU – PARKEG 9 – 82491 GRAINAU Daniela Sena

  2. A transnational project implemented by UPDATES FROM THE LP PROJECT MANAGEMENT - MONITORING - IMPLEMENTATION 1 ALPCITY PMO ENLARGEMENT 2 REPORTING/MONITORING SYSTEM 3 ALCPITY WEB SITE & NEWSLETTER BEST PRACTICES AND FUTURE SCENARIOS 4 PPs Meeting

  3. A transnational project implemented by • Maud Tronchin, I&P Assistant • and …………… • ALPCITY PMO • ‘ ENLARGEMENT’ • www.alpcity.it • Alpcity@regione.piemonte.it 1 • Franco Amato, Legal Responsible • Maria Cavallo Perin, Project Responsible • Daniela Sena, Project Manager • Anna Maria Caputano, Project Assistant • Corrado Dore, Legal Officer PPs Meeting

  4. A transnational project implemented by ….. and …‘’ Anna Maria’s FAGIOLINO ’’ GOOD NEWS 1 ALPCITY PMO ‘ ENLARGEMENT ’ PPs Meeting

  5. A transnational project implemented by • REPORTING SYSTEM • ALPCITY WEB SITE PRIVATE AREA REPORTS SECTION 2 • TEMPLATES 1) OLD 2) NEW • DEADLINES1)REPORTS2) CERTIFICATIONS • FINAL REPORTS SUBMITTED TO:MA/JTS Cc: PPs • STATUS REPORTS1) SUBMISSION 2) APPROVAL 3) PAYMENT PPs Meeting

  6. A transnational project implemented by PPs REPORTS CERTIFICATES OFFICIAL REPORTS • REPORTING SYSTEM 2 DEADLINES: WWW.ALPCITY.IT – PRIVATE AREA – SECTION REPORTS PPs Meeting

  7. A transnational project implemented by • REPORTING SYSTEM 2 1st ALPCITY PROGRESS REPORT (ACTIVITY - FINANCIAL REPORTS) 1ST ACTIVITY REPORT • SUBMISSION: 10 DECEMBER 2004 (ORIGINAL DATE OF SUBMISSION: 15 NOVEMBER 2004) • APPROVAL: 28 JANUARY 2005 – DATE OF THE MA COMMUNICATION (1 FEBRAURY 2005) 1ST FINANCIAL REPORT • SUBMISSION: 10 DECEMBER 2004 • APPROVAL: 28.1.2005 (1 FEBRUARY 2005) • RELEVANT DATA: • CERTIFICATES SUBMITTED: 3 (NIEDEROSTERREICH – FRANCHE COMTE – RHONE ALPES) • ERDF REQUIRED: 35.176,83 EURO • BUDGET STATUS: percentage of spent funds (CERTIFICATIONS) in relation to the amount which was planned (OROGINAL AF): 21 %

  8. A transnational project implemented by • REPORTING SYSTEM 2 STATUS OF PROGRESS REPORTS: WWW.ALPCITY.IT – PRIVATE AREA – SECTION REPORTS PPs Meeting

  9. A transnational project implemented by • 1ST PROGRESS REPORT 2 HIGHLIGHTS 1ST ACTIVITY REPORT • APPROVAL WITHOUT REMARKS OR REQUEST FOR INTEGRATION • TIMING FOR THE MA APPROVAL: AROUND 1 MONTH AND ½ 1STFINANCIAL REPORT • ONLY 3 CERTIFICATIONS (REFUSAL OF GRAINAU CERTIFICATION AND REQUEST FOR ERDF FUNDS) • LOW PERCENTUAGE OF SPENT/REQUIRED ERDF FUNDS (21 %) EC PAYMENT OF THE REQUIRED ERDF FUNDS • DATE OF THE MA COMMUNICATION CONCERNING THE PAYMENT TO THE LP: 7 MARCH 2005 • DATE OF RECEIPT OF ERDF FUNDS FROM THE PA (REF. TO LP): 1 APRIL 2005 • PAYMENT TO THE PPs (NIEDER. – FRNCHE COMPTE – RHONE ALPES): MAY 2005

  10. A transnational project implemented by • REPORTING SYSTEM 2 2nd PROGRESS REPORT 2ND ACTIVITY REPORT – OFFICIAL SUBMISSION DATE: 15 MAY 2005 • COLLECTION OF PARTNERS ACTIVITY REPORT • COLLECTION OF WORKING DOCUMENTS FROM PPs (CASE STUDIES) 2ND FINANCIAL REPORT • COLLECTION OF PARTNERS FINANCIAL REPORT • COLLECTION OF CERTIFICATIONS (EU PPs) 1ST I&P REPORT • COLLECTION OF PARTNERS I&P reports • COLLECTION OF I&P MATERIALS (BROCHURES, LEAFLET, NEWSLETTERS etc ….) PPs Meeting

  11. A transnational project implemented by • 2ND PROGRESS REPORT 2 HIGHLIGHTS ACTIVITY REPORTS : • MISSING ACTIVITY REPORTS: • REGIONE LOMBARDIA • RHONE – ALPES • TERRITOIRE DE BELFORT FINANCIAL REPORTS : • MISSING CERTIFICATIONS: • TERRITOIRE DE BELFORT (FAX + ORIGINAL) • RHONE ALPES (ORIGINAL) • FRANCHE COMTE (ORIGINAL • NIEDEROSTERREICH (ORIGINAL) • MISSING FINANCIAL REPORTS: • REGIONE LOMBARDIA • TERRITOIRE DE BELFORT I&P REPORTS : • MISSING FINANCIAL I&P REPORTS: • BELFORT – TSCHLIN – GRAINAU – LOMBARDIA – VENETO

  12. A transnational project implemented by • 2ND PROGRESS REPORT 2 REQUEST TO THE PROJECT PARTNERS ACTIVITY REPORT • REQUEST FOR MISSING REPORTS (LOMBARDIA – RHONE ALPES – BELFORT) • REQUEST FOR; • <<Electronic versions of all studies and analysis carried out during the project as part of work packages, output or result indicators>> (see the Activity Report template § 3.4) FINANCIAL REPORT • REQUEST FOR MISSING REPORTS (LOMBARDIA– BELFORT) • SUBMISSION OF ORGINALS (RHONE ALPES – FRANCHE COMTE – NIEDER. – BELFORT) I&P REPORT • REQUEST FOR MISSING REPORTS (BELFORT – TSCHLIN – GRAINAU – LOMBARDIA – VENETO ) • SUBMISSION OF I&P MATERIAL (BY E-MAIL OR CD)

  13. A transnational project implemented by • 2ND PROGRESS REPORT 2 HIGHLIGHTS 2ND FINANCIAL REPORT • NO REQUEST FOR ERDF FUNDS FROM TERRITOIRE DE BELFORT (1st and 2nd FINANCIAL REPORTS) • ERDF REQUESTED FUNDS (ACCORDING TO THE FR RECEIVED AND CERTIFICATIONS): • 361.873, 4 EURO • ERDF TOTAL REQUESTED FUNDS (1ST + 2ND FINANCIAL REPORTS) • 35.176,82 + 361.873, 4 =397.050, 2 EURO BUDGET STATUS: percentage of spent funds (CERTIFICATIONS) in relation to the amount which was planned (AF DEC. 2004) 69 %

  14. A transnational project implemented by • FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (REF. TO THE ‘SUBSIDY CONTRACT ’ - §3 ) 2 <<IN CASE THE LP REQUESTS LESS FUNDS THAN INDICATED (AMOUNT PER YEAR) IT IS NOT SECURED THAT THE AMOUNT NOT REQUESTED IS AVAILABLE AND CAN BE PAID OUT BY THE PA IN THE FOLLOWING PERIODS.>> REQUESTS TO THE PPs: ITALIAN PPs • SPEND AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE BY JUNE 2004 (REF. TO THE NATIONAL CERTIFICATION SYSTEM’S TIMING ) IN ORDER TO INCLUDE A RELEVANT AMOUNT OF SPENT ERDF FUNDS IN THE NOVEMBER PROGRESS REPORT • MAKE A FINANCIAL PLAN (BY SEPTEMBER ‘05) INCLUDING THE FORESEEN EXPENDITURES UP TO: • 20 DECEMBER 2005 (LIST OF INVOICES) OTHER EU PPs • SPEND THE FORESEEN AMOUNT ACCORDING TO THE BUDGET OF AF (DECEMBER 2004) • MAKE A FINANCIAL PLAN INCLUDING THE FORESEEN EXPENDITURES UP TO: • NOVEMBER 2005 (REF. TO THE FR) • DECEMBER 2005 (REF. TO THE BUDGET OF THE AF)

  15. A transnational project implemented by • FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT: REF. TO 2nd LEVEL CONTROL – (PISTA DI CONTROLLO’ ) 2 REQUESTS TO THE PPs: • TO SET UP A FILING SYSTEM ABLE TO PROVIDE ALL THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS IN CASE OF A SECOND LEVEL CONTROL/AUDIT UP TO YEAR 2012

  16. A transnational project implemented by

  17. A transnational project implemented by • WEB SITE • ANNA MARIA’s PRESENTATION • HIGHLIGHTSON SECTIONS 3 WWW.ALPCITY.IT WWW.ALPCITY.IT • REPORTS DEADLINES • CASE STUDIES FORMS FOR UPDATING • AGENDA MEETINGS • NEWS – NEWSLETTER • SSC OUTPUTS • CO-ORDINATION REPORTS PPs Meeting

  18. A transnational project implemented by • NEWSLETTER • ALPINE SPACE PRESENTATION • ALPCITY PRESENTATION • SSC • CASE STUDIES • INTERVIEW • BPs • MEETINGS • MILAN – JUNE ‘05 • INNSBRUCK • VITALCITIES • ALPENFORUM 3 WWW.ALPCITY.IT 1ST NUMBER PPs Meeting

  19. A transnational project implemented by UPDATES FORM THE LP ‘BEST PRACTICES AND FUTURE SCENARIOS’ 1 PRESENTATION OF ‘ OCS ’ ALPCITY BPs FRAMEWORKUN HABITAT ‘BP & LOCAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAMME ’ 2 3 ALPCITY BPs GUIDELINES 4 INSTRUCTIONS AND DEADLINES 5 ALPCITY BPs FRAMEWORK ON LINE – WWW.ALPCITY.IT PPs Meeting

  20. A transnational project implemented by • PRESENTATION OF ‘OCS’ – OSSERVATORIO CITTA’ SOSTENIBILI 1 WWW.OCS.POLITO.IT TEAM DEDICATED TO ALPCITY • SCIENTIFIC RESPONSIBLE (1) • REASEARCHERS (3) • IT EXPERT (1) (DATABASE + WEB)

  21. A transnational project implemented by • ALPCITY BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORK – THE UN HABITAT PROGRAMME 2 WWW.ALPCITY.IT(WPs section)BPs - ‘RUO’ WWW.UNHABITAT.ORG(MoU)(UN Habitat at Milano Meeting)

  22. A transnational project implemented by ‘OCS’ RESEARCH PPs SSC I&T ‘RUO’ BPs DATABASE ‘BEST PRACTICES LP ALCITY NETWORK • BPs STRATEGY & FOLLOW-UP • BPs COLLECTION NETWORKING • BPs SELECTION • OUTLINING OF LESSONS LEARNED • EXCHANGE & SHARING OF: • ° EXPERIENCES ° INFORMATION ° LESSONS LEARNED ° KNOWLEDGE • SELECTION CRITERIA BPs • ‘FORMS’ FOR BPs COLLECTION/ EVALUATION • BPs SELECTION SUPERVISION • SYNTHESIS OF LESSONS LEARNED • FROM BPs to POLICIES ’ GUIDELINES PPs Meeting

  23. A transnational project implemented by 2 ‘BEST PRACTICES’ WHAT ARE BEST PRACTICES ?(REF. UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY) • INITIATIVES WHICH HAVE MADE OUTSTANDINGCONTRIBUTIONS TO IMPROVING QUALITY OF LIFE IN (SMALL ALPINE) TOWNS AND COMMUNITIES • HAVE A TANGIBLE POSITIVE IMPACT ON IMPROVING PEOPLE’S QUALITY OF LIFE • ARE THE RESULT OF EFFECTIVE PARTNERSHIP (PUBLIC-PRIVATE-CIVIC SECTORS) • SOCIALLY, CULTURALLY, ECONOMICALLY AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE HOW ARE BPs IDENTIFIED AND DOCUMENTED ? • TARGET SEARCH (LP – OCS – PARTNERS) CALLS FOR BEST PRACTICES (FUTURE ‘RUO’) ONGOING RESEARCH AND PROJECT’s DEVELOPMENT (CASE STUDIES) NETWORKING PPs Meeting

  24. A transnational project implemented by 2 ‘BEST PRACTICES’ HOW ARE BPs ASSESSED ? • DEFINITION OF AREAS (GEOGRAPHICAL – THEMATIC) OF BP PRACTICES RESEARCH (REF. WPs 5-8) • SELECTION AND COLLECTION CRITERIA (PLEASE REFER TO THE BPs GUIDELINES ON LINE) • VALIDATION PROCESS(LP – OCS - PPs) – ACCURATE INFO – CORRESPONDANCE TO REALITY – CORRESPONDANCE TO SELECTION CRITERIA – BPs REPORTING FORMAT • ‘TECHNICAL APPRAISAL ’ (LP – OCS – SSC): • COMPLIANCE WITH BASIC CRITERIA: IMPACT – PARTNERSHIP – SUSTAINABILITY • COMPLIANCE WITH LEADERSHIP AND LOCAL COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT – INNOVATION – GENDER EQUALITY – PARTICIPATION – SOCIAL INCLUSION AND TRANSFERABBILITY • POSITIVE IMPACT AND MERIT WITH REGIONAL AND LOCAL CONTEXT • RELATIVE MERIT IN COMPARISON TO OTHER PRACTICES (REF. TO ALPINE SPACE AREA – THEMATIC AREA) BPs FOLLOW-UP ? • BPs DATABASE TAKEN OVER BY AN OBSERVATORY ON ALPINE/MOUTAIN AREA • ALPCITIES BEST PRACTICES AWARD • NETWORKING PPs Meeting

  25. A transnational project implemented by 2 ‘BEST PRACTICES’ SUBMISSION FORM(BPs NETWORK) – REF. TO FORMS ON LINE

  26. A transnational project implemented by ‘BEST PRACTICES 1 MAIN STEPS UP TO NOW SETTING UP BPs FRAMEWORKWEB SITE – (RUO) 2 INVOLVEMENT OF ‘OCS’ 1.JANUARY 2005 2. MARCH 2005 3. MARCH 2005 MAY 2005 4. JUNE 2005 GUIDELINES FOR: 1) BEST PRACTICES IDENTIFICATION2) MAIN BPs DATABASE3) BPS TRANSFERABILITY4) COMMON STRATEGY5) RUO6) ALPCITY – ALPINE CONVENTION 3 BPs DATABASESTRUCTUREFORMSPROCEDURES CO-ORDINATION SUPERVISION > EXCHANGE 4 LESSONS LEARNERD POLICIES GUIDELINES PPs Meeting

  27. A transnational project implemented by NETWORK COMMON STRATEGY BPs LEARNING CENTRE SECTIONS

  28. A transnational project implemented by NETWORK • ALPCITY BPs NETWORK • RUO NETWORK

  29. A transnational project implemented by BPs • CRITERIA • DATABASE • GUIDELINES 1) BPs • 2) MAIN DATABASE • 3) TRANSFER • SUBMISSION FORM

  30. A transnational project implemented by LEARNING CENTRE • VIRTUAL LIBRARY • GUIDELINES • INDICATORS • ALPINE LIBRARY • ARTICLES • ALPCITYVIRTUAL LIBRARY • ALPCITY GUIDELINES (6) • ALPCITY PROJECT REPORTS (JUNE) • (THEMATIC FORUM)

  31. A transnational project implemented by 1 2 3 5 6 4 BPsHANDBOOK MAIN BPsDATABASES TRANSFER OF LESSONS LEARNED ALPCITYCOMMONSTRATEGY FEATURESRUO ALPCITY/ALPINE CONVENTION ALPCITY GUIDELINES(ON LINE –– ALPCITY LIBRARY – ITALIAN)

  32. A transnational project implemented by LINKS • BPs – INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES (3) • SPATIAL PLANNING OBSERVATORIES (1) • ALPINE CITIES NETWORKS (9) • INTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN NETWORKS (1) • EUROPEAN CITIES NETWORKS (9) • URBAN OBSERVATORIES WORLDWIDE (5)

  33. A transnational project implemented by

  34. A transnational project implemented by

  35. A transnational project implemented by

  36. A transnational project implemented by

  37. A transnational project implemented by 1 VISIT THE ALPCITY WEB SITE – SECTION BPs 20 MAY 2005 2 DOWNLOAD GUIDELINES STARTING BY N. 1 20 MAY 2005 3 BE AWARE OF THE SELECTION PROCESS SUBMISSION FORM ON LINE 20 MAY 2005 4 START TO SEARCH AND COLLECT BPs (PPs) BY MAY 2005 5 MOBILITATE YOUR SUBCONTRATED INSTITUTIONS (REF. TO CASE STUDIES) AND PROVIDE THEM WITH THE SUBMISSION FORM BY MAY 2005 6 FILL IN THE SUBMISSION FORM WITH INFORMATION CONCERNING BPs RELATED TO YOUR CASE STUDIES ’ AREA (AT LEAST 2-3 BPs) – IF POSSIBLE TO OTHERS WORK PACKAGES ’ WORKING AREAS BEGINNING OF JUNE 2005 7 SEND THE FILLED IN FORMS TO THE LP BY 15 JUNE 2005 8 PROVIDE THE LP WITH REQUIRED INTEGRATIONS BY 20 JUNE 2005 STEP INSTRUCTIONS TO PPs FOR THE BPs SUBMISSION DEADLINES

  38. A transnational project implemented by 1 OVERALL LP CO-ORDINATION/STEERING ‘BEST PRACTICES NEXT STEPS 2 OCS SUPPORT (IT) AND BPs SEARCH 3 SSC ADVICE(SELECTION CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES) 1.UP TO OCTOBER 2006 2. UP TO OCTOBER 2006 3. BY MAY 2005 4. BEGINNING JUNE 2005 5. BY JUNE 15, 2005 6. BY JUNE 20, 2005 7. BY JUNE 2005 4 SUBMISSION BPs FORMSBY PPs 5 LP – OCS FIRST ASSESSMENT 6 PPs INTEGRATIONS 7 LP – OCS - SSC ASSESSMENT BASIC BPs DATABASE PPs Meeting

  39. A transnational project implemented by

  40. A transnational project implemented by UPDATES FROM THE LP ALPCITY SCIENTIFIC MEETING, 27-28 JUNE 2005 1 LOGISITCAL ISSUES 2 AGENDA AND LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 3 I&P STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES SSC ROLE AND INPUTSPROPOSITIONS PAPERS 4 PPs Meeting

  41. A transnational project implemented by 1 LOGISTICAL ISSUES OVERALL SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION FVG • ROOMS (PLENARY – WG – POSTERS AREA) • TRANSLATION • LOGISTICAL INFO • EQUIPMENT • COMMUNICATION • INVITATION • BROCHURES • EVENT’S POSTERS • BADGE • CATERING • COFFEE BREAKS • LUNCH • APERITIVO • (DINNER) ALPCITY SCIENTIFIC MEETING, 27-28 JUNE 2005 PPs Meeting

  42. A transnational project implemented by 2 AGENDA PLENARY SESSIONS (2) WORKING GROUPS(4) MODERATORS: Mr Scheurer, ISCAR Ms Kober, SSC ALPCITY SCIENTIFIC MEETING, 27-28 JUNE 2005 PPs Meeting

  43. A transnational project implemented by 2 WORKING GROUPS’ SESSION ALPCITY SCIENTIFIC MEETING, 27-28 JUNE 2005

  44. A transnational project implemented by 2 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS (INDICATIVE NUMBER: 120 – 140) ALPCITY SCIENTIFIC MEETING, 27-28 JUNE 2005

  45. A transnational project implemented by 3 INFORMATION AND PUBLICITY ALPCITY SCIENTIFIC MEETING, 27-28 JUNE 2005 • WEB SITE (INVITATION – AGENDA – LOGISTICAL ISSUE) • INVITATION (BY E-MAIL AND ON LINE) • NEWSLETTER (ON LINE – MAILING LIST) • BROCHURE ALPCITY INCLUDING EVENT (ON LINE) • MEDIA (e.g. AlpMedia – JTS web site – newsletter etc …) PPs Meeting

  46. A transnational project implemented by 3 1 WG 4 5 2 ALPCITY SCIENTIFIC MEETING, 27-28 JUNE 2005 PROPOSITIONS PAPERS ISSUES OF DISCUSSIONS(mainly written by the SSC Experts) QUESTIONS TO WGs PARTICIPANTS(mainly written by theSSC Experts) INTRODUCTION(mainly written by the WP Co-ordinators) DEBATE’s HIGHLIGHTSand PROCEEDINGS(after the meeting – finalised by the WP Co-ordinators in collaboration with the SSC Experts) SYNTHESIS OF CASE STUDIES(mainly written by the WP Co-ordinators) (3-4 PAGES)

  47. A transnational project implemented by ALPCITY SCIENTIFIC MEETING, 27-28 JUNE 2005 ALPCITY PROJECT REPORT

  48. A transnational project implemented by

  49. A transnational project implemented by WORKING SESSION, PPs MEETING WORKING GROUPS (14.30 h – 15.30 h) 1 ORGANISATION OF WGs 2 AIM OF THE WGs SESSION 3 TOPICS OF DISCUSSION PRESENTATION OF THE WORKING SESSION HIGHLIGHTS 4 PPs Meeting

  50. A transnational project implemented by WORKING SESSION, PPs MEETING WORKING GROUPS’ ORGANISATION PPs Meeting

More Related