1 / 9

CRCC Informal RDA Testing Task Force: Experiences as a Reviewer

Join Robert Rendall from Columbia University as he shares his experiences reviewing Resource Description and Access (RDA) standards during a CRCC informal task force meeting on January 10, 2011. This session highlights the intricacies of RDA as written, explores CONSER standard record guidelines, and reviews Library of Congress policy statements. Gain insights into key topics such as punctuation, capitalization, field entry protocols, and continuing resource-specific issues, while understanding emerging challenges in the evolving landscape of cataloging standards.

tobit
Télécharger la présentation

CRCC Informal RDA Testing Task Force: Experiences as a Reviewer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CRCC Informal RDA Testing Task Force: Experiences as a Reviewer Robert Rendall Columbia University Jan. 10, 2011

  2. or, Desperately Trying to Stay One Step Ahead of the Testers

  3. Options! • RDA as written • CONSER standard record guidelines • Library of Congress Policy Statements • whatever you can find on the Web

  4. Things We’re Not Supposed to Worry About Any More • Punctuation • Capitalization • Wording of notes

  5. Simple Changes • Leader/18: i • 040 $e rda • enter 33X fields– and don’t enter a 245 $h!

  6. More Changes • Abbreviations • Frequency terms in conference headings • Which relationship designator? (if you enter one)

  7. What We Didn’t Talk About(Much) • Continuing resource-specific issues • FRBR concepts

  8. Comparison with the Official Test • No common set • No record-by-record questionnaires

  9. rr2205@columbia.edu

More Related