1 / 10

Road adoption: Design Standards & Benchmarking

This document outlines the key principles of road adoption in Hertfordshire, focusing on design standards and benchmarking. It covers national and local standards, emphasizing the importance of solutions tailored to local circumstances and the incorporation of innovative techniques like Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDs). By reviewing the relevance of benchmarking and collaboration between local authorities, the text highlights the importance of clear standards that provide certainty and minimize risk in the road adoption process, ensuring that only maintainable roads are adopted by the Highway Authority.

tobit
Télécharger la présentation

Road adoption: Design Standards & Benchmarking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Road adoption:Design Standards & Benchmarking Nick Gough Area Highway Development Control Manager - SW Hertfordshire

  2. Summary Design Standards • Who, what and why • National standards • Local standards Benchmarking • Relevance to road adoption • National • Regional • Within Hertfordshire

  3. Design Standards 1 Who, what and why • National standards • Design Manual for Roads and Bridges • Design Bulletin 32 (1977) superseded by Manual for Streets (2007) • Reflects changes planning policy • Solutions tailored to circumstances rather than worst case standard • Encourages local distinctiveness and use of innovative techniques like SUstainable Drainage Systems or SUDs

  4. Design Standards 2 • Local standards • Available on-line at http://www.hertsdirect.org • Roads in Hertfordshire 2nd edition being reviewed • Incorporate changes in national context as well as local initiatives like the Transport Asset Management Plan and emerging Local Transport Plan 3 • Incorporate clarified approach to adoption agreed at Highway & Transport Panel in November 2009 • 3rd edition will be web-based and more easily updatable • Standards give certainty and minimise risk - for all parties • For the Highway Authority this means only adopting roads we would be willing to maintain

  5. Benchmarking • Relevance to road adoption - meeting with Welwyn Hatfield and Hertsmere in late 2007. • Particular concerns about large multi-phase/ developer sites like British Aerospace, Hatfield • National level comparisons • Regional • Within Hertfordshire

  6. National scene • Web search results: • Shires who refer to the APC on their website = 9 out of 27 • Derbyshire, Devon, Essex, Gloucestershire, Hampshire, Kent, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire and Suffolk • West Sussex considering its stance on the APC • Unitaries who refer to the APC = 14 out of 57 • Barnsley, Basingstoke & Dean, Bury, Cornwall, Coventry, Derby, Halton, Kirklees, Pembrokeshire, Plymouth, Swansea, Swindon, Vale of Glamorgan and Wokingham • District who refers to the APC: South Somerset

  7. Regional approach to adoption 1 General development topics • Development Management Forum every 6 months • Next full meeting at HCC on 10 May • Eastern region benchmarking group to meet on 5 March • Responses from 9 authorities in February 2008 • Criteria: charging for pre-application advice, S38 and S 278 procedures, commuted sums, S 106 and Community Infrastructure Levy • Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Essex, HCC, Norfolk, Peterborough, Southend, Suffolk and Thurrock

  8. Regional approach to adoption 2 Team structure and the Advanced Payment Code • Responses from 15 authorities from Southern and Eastern Forums in October 2008 • These 6 apply the Code: Essex, Oxfordshire, Slough (unitary), Suffolk, West Berkshire (unitary) and Wokingham (unitary) • These 10 do not apply the Code: Bedfordshire (pre-split), Brighton & Hove (unitary), Buckinghamshire, Cambridgeshire (tomorrow), East Sussex, Hertfordshire, Isle of Wight (unitary), Luton (unitary), Peterborough (unitary), and Reading (unitary) • 10 + 6 # 15

  9. Regional approach to adoption 3 Reasons for not using the APC • ‘…staff time and cost involved to do it properly have always been the deciding factor’ • ‘Often it didn't really achieve what we wanted it to achieve and left us with additional work to do’ • ‘…it can restrict flexibility’

  10. Any questions

More Related