1 / 20

Development of a Multidisciplinary Curriculum for Intelligent Systems (MCIS)

Development of a Multidisciplinary Curriculum for Intelligent Systems (MCIS). Dimitris C. Lagoudas Jeffery E. Froyd Othon K. Rediniotis Thomas W. Strganac John L. Valasek John D. Whitcomb Rita M. Caso. http://smart.tamu.edu/CRCD. Goals of MCIS Effort at TAMU.

totie
Télécharger la présentation

Development of a Multidisciplinary Curriculum for Intelligent Systems (MCIS)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Development of a Multidisciplinary Curriculum for Intelligent Systems (MCIS) Dimitris C. Lagoudas Jeffery E. Froyd Othon K. Rediniotis Thomas W. Strganac John L. Valasek John D. Whitcomb Rita M. Caso http://smart.tamu.edu/CRCD

  2. Goals of MCIS Effort at TAMU • Develop new curriculum track on Intelligent Systems emphasizing aerospace technologies. • Increase knowledge and interest in using smart materials to design intelligent systems. • Include a 2 semester design course and a one-on-one directed studies course with a faculty member. • Offer an “Intelligent Systems Track” Certificate. • 15 hour program • Includes recognition on transcript URICA and design team Synthetic Jet Actuator

  3. Courses Impacted • AERO 101 – Introduction to Aerospace Engineering (F01) • ENGR 111/112 – Foundations of Engineering I/II (F01/S02) • ENGR 211/213/214 –Basic engineering science courses (S02, F02) • AERO 302 – Aerospace Engineering Laboratory I (S02) • AERO 304/306 – Structural Mechanics I/II (F01, F02) • AERO 401/402 – Senior design sequence (F03, S04) • AERO 405 – Aerospace Structural Design (F01) • AERO 489* – Special Topic: MEMS for Aerospace Engineering (F01) • AERO 489* – Special Topic: Aerospace Intelligent Systems (S02) *New Course

  4. Foundations of Engineering (ENGR 111/112) Activities with Shape Memory Alloys (SMA) Butterfly Demonstration:SMA Linear Actuator Heat Engine Demo:SMA Efficiency/Thermodynamics Thermobile™ Demo:SMA Properties/Thermodynamics Stiquito Project:Application of SMA

  5. ENGR 111 Project Walking Robot • Robot (Stiquito) specifications: • Must be actuated by SMAs • Goal is maximum distance in 3 minutes • Only contact can come from ground • Must be an autonomous system • Assigned to 24 four-person student teams in ENGR 111 • Maximum distance traveled was 48cm.

  6. Piezo patch Shaker ENGR 11x/21x DemonstrationPiezoelectric Beam Demo • Demonstration for Freshman/Sophomore to show the basic function of a piezoelectric patch Planned Setup • Piezoelectric patches will be used to cancel a known vibration. Beams with patches and amplifier

  7. ENGR 111/112Integrated with AERO 401/402 • There are two primary objectives: • Let first year students gain practical experience working on the design and construction of an aerospace vehicle while working with upperclassmen. • Allow seniors to learn and develop important project management skills needed in the workplace today.

  8. Without Actuation With Actuation AERO 302 Project Synthetic Jet Actuators Introduction into the classroom: AERO 302 (Aerospace Engineering Laboratory 1) Use of Hot-Wires and Fast- Response Pressure Probes to measure actuator exit velocity as a function of operating frequency Visualization of the effect of Synthetic Jet Actuators on airflow

  9. AERO 306: Design Optimization of a Reconfigurable Active Wing Demonstration Model Synthetic Jet Nozzles Pressure Sensor Arrays Rib with Embbedded SMA Actuators Rib with Embbedded SMA Actuators

  10. SMA Wires Internal Support Structure Compression Springs Linkage to Skin Springs Spar Springs Flow Direction Rib SMA tensioner bolts AERO 306: Active Reconfigurable Wing Experimental Model - Structural Concept Schematic Drawing FEM Analysis Experimental Model

  11. AERO 405: Urica I Flying Wing (FEA Spar & Rib Von-Mises Stresses)

  12. AERO 306/405Finite Element Analysis Environments • Three Alternatives • Commercial finite element programs with integrated pre- and post-processor • Examples: FEMAP • Advantages: tested, reliable, flexible • Disadvantages: multiple options, steep learning curve • In-house codes • Examples: alpha, plot2000 • Advantages: few options, shallow learning curve • Disadvantages: lower reliability, less flexibility • Partial differential equation solver (FlexPDE, PDEase2D, FemLab) • Examples: FlexPDE, PDEase2D, Femlab • Advantages: great flexibility, customization • Disadvantages: slower execution due to non-optimized code

  13. Identify needs for reconfiguration Knowledge & Feasibility Knowledge Criteria Facilitator Structural Reconfiguration Flow Reconfiguration AERO 401/402Autonomous Intelligent Reconfiguration

  14. Electrical Control Surfaces Data Firewall SMA wires SMA experiment SJA experiment AERO 401/402 Autonomous Intelligent Reconfiguration • Hybrid Simplex-Genetic Algorithm • Improve and Refine Existing Algorithm • Hysteretic Actuators • Extend Current Actuators from SISO to MIMO Type • Synthetic Jet Actuator Flow Regime Expansion • Extend Low Speed Results to High Speed Regime • Evaluate in Non-Laboratory Environment • Fly on UAV Testbed

  15. FABRICATION Photolithography Wet and dry etching Oxidation, nitridation Evaporation, sputtering Electrodeposition CVD, LPCVD, PECVD Surface micromachining Bulk micromachining THEORY Scaling laws Electrostatics, capacitive devices Magnetostatics, inductive devices Surface tension Fluid mechanics Electro-fluid mechanics AERO 489: Special Topics in MEMS for Aerospace Engineering Adaptive Microscope Lens

  16. Basics of Aerodynamics, Structures and Controls Fundamentals of Fluid Motion and Aerodynamics Fundamentals of Structural Mechanics Fundamentals of Systems Control Experimental Techniques in Fluids and Structures Data-Acquisition Fundamentals Intelligent Flow Diagnostics Intelligent Structures Monitoring Smart or Active Materials Shape Memory Alloys Piezoceramic Materials Magnetostrective and Electrorheological Materials Sensors and Actuators Conventional Sensors and Actuators in Aerospace Engineering Intelligent Sensors Smart material Actuators Intelligent Systems in Flow Control Passive Flow Control Techniques Active Flow Control Techniques Synthetic Jet Technology in Flow Control Traveling Waves and Skin Friction Reduction Biomimetics in Aerospace Engineering Fundamentals of Fish Swimming Fundamentals of Bird Flight Biomimetic Underwater Vehicles Flapping-Wing Uninhabited Air Vehicles (UAV) Micro Air Vehicles (MAV) Lotus Leaves and Hydrodynamic Skin Friction Reduction Intelligent Techniques in Systems Modeling Artificial Neural Networks Fuzzy Logic Multiresolution Analysis Proper Orthogonal Decomposition AERO 489: Special Topics in Aerospace Intelligent systems

  17. AERO 489: Special Topics in Aerospace Intelligent systems – Aeroelasticity • Objectives • Examine the interdependence of engineering disciplines such as aerodynamics, structural, and control • Examine the contributions of design concepts that employ “intelligent systems” such as distributed controllers, active materials, and flow control. • Illustrate behavior via benchmark experiments. • Typical activities include • static and dynamic behavior • aerodynamic-structurally coupled systems • forced response from control systems • equilibrium vs. stability concepts • consistent measurements • validation and verification Multi-control surface wing in 2x3 wind tunnel Wing support system

  18. Assessment and Evaluation PlanYear 1 Outcome Measurement(Implemented1and/or Projected ) 1 Levels at which Implemented ( i.e., F=Freshman, S=Senior)

  19. Assessment & Evaluation ResultsKnowledge of Team Design Process, Teamwork & Communication1Freshmen vs. Seniors (Baselines -- Beginning Fall 2001 Samples) 1 Adapted TIDEE Project Mid Program Assessment Instrument #1, Design Knowledge 2 Members of one ENGR 111 class which utilized AERO CRCD Project curriculum 3 Members of AERO Senior Design course 4 Scores given on a scale of 0 – 5.5, with 0=no knowledge & 5.5=exceptional knowledge

  20. Assessment & Evaluation ResultsKnowledge of Team Design Process, Teamwork & Communication One Semester Improvement in Freshmen1 1 Members of one ENGR 111 class which utilized AERO CRCD Project curriculum, Fall 2001 2 Adapted TIDEE Project Mid Program Assessment Instrument #1, Design Knowledge (n=88), Sept 2001 3 Adapted TIDEE Project Mid Program Assessment Instrument #3, Reflective Essay (n=87), Dec 2001 4 Scores given on a scale of 0 – 5.5, with 0=no knowledge & 5.5=exceptional knowledge

More Related