1 / 14

Enhancing MAPS: A Bilateral Donor Perspective from the International Forum in Beijing

This document outlines key insights from Frances Harper, Head of Profession for Statistics, during the International Forum on Monitoring National Development held in Beijing in September 2011. It discusses the successes and limitations of the MAPS (Monitoring and Action for Poverty Statistics) framework, highlighting opportunities for stronger engagement with non-statistical stakeholders to enhance its impact. The presentation emphasizes the importance of transparency, accountability, and results-driven actions, and provides suggestions for future initiatives to build on the framework's achievements.

tracen
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing MAPS: A Bilateral Donor Perspective from the International Forum in Beijing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Busan – Building on MAPS A bilateral donor perspective Frances Harper Head of Profession for Statistics International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  2. Outline: • MAPS - successes & limitations • Busan • Opportunities • Actions • Suggestions International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  3. MAPS: successes • NSDS • Population census • MDG data • IHSN • Funding • Etc… International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  4. MAPS: limitations • NSDS (implementation?) • MDG data (modelled?) • Funding (sustainable?) • Didn’t go beyond statistical community International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  5. BUSAN: an opportunity • To build on success of MAPS • To address limitations: • Engaging non statisticians (so must be politically attractive) • Responding to policymakers (by supporting transparency, accountability & results) International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  6. With that in mind….. some (additional) thoughts on the actions. International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  7. International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  8. International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  9. International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  10. International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  11. International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  12. International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  13. Overall? • Excellent basis • Continue to strengthen: • Language (ensure attractive to non statisticians) • Actions (make as concrete and measurable as possible) • Remain ambitious International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

  14. Thank you International Forum on Monitoring National Development: Issues & Challenges, Beijing Sep 2011

More Related