1 / 14

New RSH Standard: 1.4.18 Value for Money

New RSH Standard: 1.4.18 Value for Money. Scrutiny.Net 11 th April 2018, Habinteg Yvonne Davies, Managing Director Scrutiny & Empowerment Partners. VFM Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness. Transparency Accountability It is about:

tracyg
Télécharger la présentation

New RSH Standard: 1.4.18 Value for Money

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New RSH Standard: 1.4.18Value for Money Scrutiny.Net 11th April 2018, Habinteg Yvonne Davies, Managing Director Scrutiny & Empowerment Partners

  2. VFMEconomy, Efficiency and Effectiveness • Transparency • Accountability It is about: • Economy – minimise resources used while having regard to quality • Efficiency – relationship between output from goods and services and the resources to produce them • Effectiveness – the extent to which objectives are achieved and the relationship between intended and actual impacts

  3. Headline social housing costs per unit by provider Median social housing costs per unit (£3,550) shown by the horizontal line. Red markers identify providers where more than 10% of stock is supported housing (excluding housing for older people) or more than 50% is housing for older people

  4. Unit cost variations – most important explanatory factors

  5. New VFM standard What we knew and what has changed– April 2018

  6. New standard in summary • Replaces the old VFM self assessment • Starts reporting on metrics – mainly financial • Produced a VFM metrics technical note, new standard and code of practice – consultation to xmas 2017 • Feedback– social value and impact measurements which were missing – change to ensuring that financial return from assets and resources is optimised • Feedback – publication of metrics in accounts – change to ability to report outside the account sin any way they see fit to encourage transparency with stakeholders • Reporting under headings social housing and other, activities

  7. New VFM regulatory standard • Have an approach agreed by Board to achieving VFM in meeting strategic objectives and demonstrate VFM to stakeholders Ensure optimum benefit from resources, assets and optimise the 3 Es • Approach to decision making and improving performance • Targets and monitoring of performance • Publish performance and measurable plans to address underperformance

  8. VFM Code of practice • A VFM strategy or embed it in each of your objectives • Maximise return on assets • Operational in activities • Strategic in all decisions • Show understanding of costs and outcomes • Rigorous options appraisal to improve performance • Implications for structures, partnerships, mergers, procurement, geography, business streams • Non social housing activity

  9. Business Health • Operating margin (overall) • Operating margin (social housing) • EBITDA MRI as % of interest (on outstanding debt) • B. Development – capacity and supply • Units developed (absolute) • Units developed (as a percentage of units owned) • Gearing • C. Outcomes delivered • Customer satisfaction with service provided • £s invested for every £ generated from operations • in new housing supply • in communities • D. Effective asset management • Return on capital employed (ROCE) • Occupancy (essentially a positive spin on void rate) • Ratio of responsive repairs to planned maintenance spend • E. Operating efficiencies • Headline social housing cost per unit • Rent collected • Overheads as a percentage of adjusted turnover • Plus some context : turnover split by activity, type of stock managed & supported geographical spread • Business Health • Operating margin (overall) • Operating margin (social housing) • EBITDA MRI as % of interest (on outstanding debt) • B. Development – capacity and supply • Units developed (absolute) • Units developed (as a percentage of units owned) • Gearing • C. Outcomes delivered • Customer satisfaction with service provided • £s invested for every £ generated from operations • in new housing supply • in communities • D. Effective asset management • Return on capital employed (ROCE) • Occupancy (essentially a positive spin on void rate) • Ratio of responsive repairs to planned maintenance spend • E. Operating efficiencies • Headline social housing cost per unit • Rent collected • Overheads as a percentage of adjusted turnover Value for Money - Pilot Scorecard

  10. Technical note: new metrics x 6 • Reinvestment • New supply • Gearing • EBITDA • Headline social housing cost per unit (includes community /neighbourhood services) • Operating margin • Return on capital employed

  11. Formal panels engaged in VFM • Procurement panels • Scrutiny panels • Performance panels • Restructuring services • Participatory budgets • Service Improvement, or task and finish Focus groups • Sending in ideas on saving money or reducing/removing waste

  12. Formal engagement • VFM strategy – customer involvement • Critical friend - consumer regulatory standards • Discussions on shared services • Process mapping – flowcharts can help • Right first time – repairs • Benchmarking – like for like • ASB prevention and early intervention • Investigating the private sector offer • Performance - What is measured - is it for tenants or landlords? What matters? Is action taken? • Social value - or impact on health/education services

  13. Customer strategic engagement • Do customers know the objectives and the VFM strategy? • Does CI activity review and report on VFM? • Do customers comment on performance indicators? • How can we engage customers in setting qualitative standards and performance – consumer standards • How can we engage customers in underperformance? • Do customers get involved in corporate or annual plans? • Do customers know where they fit in, in terms of support and challenge on VFM? • Do customers know how you benchmark and compare to best in class? • Do customers engage in setting quality standards for customer service?

  14. Thank-you - Any questions? yvonne@tenantadvisor.net Tel: 07867 974659 Check out the free housing policy advice on: www.tenantadvisor.net/blogs

More Related