1 / 14

The CeQuInt Project: rationale , activities & intended outcomes

The CeQuInt Project: rationale , activities & intended outcomes. Axel Aerden. Aims: mutual recognition of accreditation & quality assurance decisions. Results of this cooperation : Code of good practice (2004) Principles for the selection of experts (2005)

trey
Télécharger la présentation

The CeQuInt Project: rationale , activities & intended outcomes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The CeQuInt Project: rationale, activities & intended outcomes Axel Aerden

  2. Aims: mutual recognition of accreditation & quality assurance decisions • Results of this cooperation: • Code of good practice (2004) • Principles for the selection of experts (2005) • Principles for accreditation procedures regarding joint programmes (2007) • Bilateral mutual recognition of accreditation agreements (2007) • Qrossroads.eu (2008) • Principles regarding learning outcomes in accreditation procedures (20010) • Multilateral agreement regarding joint programmes (2011)

  3. Internationalisation in higher education? • Curricula with an international orientation in content, aimed at preparing students for performing (professionally/socially) in an international and multicultural context and designed for domestic students as well as foreign students (Bremer & van der Wende, 1995) • “The process of integrating an international, intercultural, or global dimension into the purpose, functions or delivery of post-secondary education” (Knight, 2004) • “Internationalisation of the curriculum is the incorporation of an international and intercultural dimension into the preparation, delivery and outcomes of a program of study” (Leask, 2009)

  4. Quality and Internationalisation borderless (inter)connected distinctive QA & Accreditation Assessment of Internationalisation

  5. Instruments to “measure” internationalisation

  6. Aims & objectives • To assess quality of internationalisation • Quality assurance approach (in line with ESG) • By peers • Qualitative assessment • not based on quantitative indicators • Internationalisation’s impact on education • To reward internationalisation • Award of a Certificate for Quality in Internationalisation • To enhance internationalisation • Expert report with recommendations • Good Practice Workshops • Platform for sharing Good Practices

  7. Envisaged benefits for HE • Enhancement perspective • Implementation internationalisation policies • Internationalisation of curricula • Sharing experiences & Benchmarking practices • Qualitative standards – examplary practices • Workshop on good practices • Good practices in internationalisation platform

  8. 15 higher education institutions • Belgium, • Denmark, • Finland, • Germany, • Italy, • Lithuania, • Norway, • Poland, • Spain, • The Netherlands, • UK Project groups Steering Group Stakeholders Group

  9. Assessment methodology Training day

  10. Pilot procedures

  11. Dissemination & Exploitation

  12. Intended outcomes • Methodology to assess quality of internationalisation • Frameworks, guidelines, templates, appeal procedure • Methodology to award Certificate for Quality in Internationalisation • Responsibilities for procedures and decision-making • Good Practices in Internationalisation Platform • Web portal and selection procedure

  13. Thank you and good luck • www.ecaconsortium.net • www.qrossroads.eu | www.ecapedia.net

More Related