210 likes | 335 Vues
Sampling of Private Wells for Pesticides, Upstate NY. Presentation to the NYS Soil & Water Conservation Committee Oct. 21, 2008 Brian Richards and Steve Pacenka Soil & Water Group Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering.
E N D
Sampling of Private Wells forPesticides, Upstate NY Presentation to the NYS Soil & Water Conservation Committee Oct. 21, 2008 Brian Richards and Steve Pacenka Soil & Water Group Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering
Research project being conducted for the DEC Bureau of Pesticides Management Luanne Whitbeck, Project Manager Sam Jackling, Section Chief - Product Registration Maureen Serafini, Bureau Head Additional Cornell personnel: Tammo Steenhuis (PD), Todd Walter (co-PI) Water Resources Institute – Susan Riha
Project impetus To answer the question: “What about upstate?” more specifically: “Are product registration reviews and subsequent application practices adequate to protect upstate groundwater?”
Project goal To assess current potential for groundwater contamination by examining well water in vulnerable sites Well water in vulnerable areas testing at safe levels is presumptive evidence that groundwater is also safe elsewhere.
Objectives today • Update on findings and status • Where next?
Process Identify counties of interest Discuss with SWCD and others in county Recruit land owners Sample; analyze at DEC & Cornell BEE labs Interpretation
County Partners through 2008 Cayuga Genesee Schenectady Cortland Orange
Well Selection Three approaches used for locating potential sampling sites 1) Local knowledge -local experts & experience (nitrate issues) -existing maps & databases -local scouting (drive by and now “fly-over”)
2) Modelingproduces maps of relative vulnerability for pesticide transport based on soil properties ... not a prediction of actual water concentrations
3) PSUR database Database used to determine relative application intensity by zip code regions
Landowner Recruitment once potential sites are identified: • In cooperation with SWCD • Voluntary participation • Free to landowner • Confidential - DEC only sees ID code - no specific reporting of identity or location
Testing for ... • Long list of 93 pesticide & herbicide active ingredients; at DEC Pesticide Lab • Nitrates at Cornell Soil & Water Group lab • Selected individual active ingredients using higher resolution immunoassay methods, at Cornell Soil & Water Group lab
And finding ... • DEC lab: no detectable amount of any active ingredient in first 120 samples (Cortland, Schenectady, Orange Counties) • Detection limits are ~ 1 ug/L (1 ppb) or less • Nitrates typical for rural NY, a few values above 5 mg/L
more findings ... • Immunoassays (Cortland, Schenectady; Orange County underway): few traces below quantitation limits, all far below drinking water or environmental standards • Overall, GOOD NEWS FOR RURAL WATER CONSUMERS
As we progress ... • Increasing our ability to identify vulnerable locations • Vulnerability = mobile and persistent chemicals, for example atrazine, used on larger fraction of land area • Extra vulnerability in carbonate rock-dominated areas? (i.e. karst, limestone)
Active Ingredients Use Intensity - Weighted for Persistence and Mobility
Contacts & where to find reports • Luanne Whitbeck (NYS DEC) • Brian Richards (bkr2@cornell.edu)
Thanks • Keith Porter and Susan Riha NYS WRI directors, who delegated to BEE • Cortland, Schenectady, Orange, Cayuga, and Genesee County Soil and Water Conservation Districts: local partners • Cornell Pesticide Management Education Program for help using the PSUR database • NYS Soil & Water Conservation Committee for early endorsement • Cornell students Ian Toevs, Tony Salvucci, Ben Liu, Sophia Garcia, Ivy Tsoi, Zia Ahmed