1 / 10

Mission and Accreditation

On March 9, 2009, Dr. Richard Beck led the Strategic Planning Steering Committee to discuss the institution’s mission, integrity, and commitment to high academic standards. The conversation revolved around defining both internal and external constituencies served, establishing goals for learning achievement, and ensuring the mission is regularly reviewed by the board and made publicly accessible. Emphasizing diversity and community value, the committee also focused on strategic planning, mission fulfillment, environmental scanning, student learning outcomes, and the effective application of knowledge for continuous improvement.

trixie
Télécharger la présentation

Mission and Accreditation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mission and Accreditation Strategic Planning Steering Committee March 9, 2009 Dr. Richard Beck

  2. Criterion One: Mission and Integrity • The Mission Document • Definition of internal and external constituencies served • Commitment to high academic standards and excellence in higher learning • Goals for learning achievement • Regularly reviewed • Board adopted • Publicly available

  3. Criterion One: Mission and Integrity • Recognition of Diversity • Community value and common purpose • Multicultural society • Dignity and worth of individuals

  4. Criterion One: Mission and Integrity • Pervasive Application • Strategic decisions • Planning and budgeting • Congruent goals and articulation

  5. Criterion One: Mission and Integrity • Mission Fulfillment • Board oversight • Delegated authority • Institutional commitment • Effective communication • Ongoing evaluation

  6. Criterion Two: Planning for the Future • Environmental scanning and awareness • Resource development and allocation • Institutional effectiveness and continuous improvement • Mission driven

  7. Criterion Three: Student Learning and Effective Teaching • Student learning outcomes • Effective teaching • Effective learning environments • Learning resources

  8. Criterion Four: Acquisition, Discovery, and Application of Knowledge • Life-long learning • General education and co-curricular coordination • Global, diverse, and technological society • Responsible application of knowledge

  9. Criterion Five: Engagement and Service • Service to constituencies • Engagement with external communities • Responsive application • Acknowledged value

  10. Five Criteria: Summary • Internal and external constituencies (1) • High academic standards (1) • Goals for learning achievement (1) • Recognition of diversity (1) • Planning for the future (2) • Student learning and effective teaching (3) • Acquisition, discovery, and application of knowledge (4) • Engagement and service (5)

More Related