1 / 30

The Psychology of Perceived Wealth

The Asymmetric Role of Assets and Debt. The Psychology of Perceived Wealth. Abigail Sussman & Eldar Shafir Princeton University. A0. Wealth. Drives economic behavior and well-being. $1 ≠ $ 1 Diminishing marginal utility (e.g. Bernoulli , 1738/1954)

tuyen
Télécharger la présentation

The Psychology of Perceived Wealth

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Asymmetric Role of Assets and Debt The Psychology of Perceived Wealth Abigail Sussman & Eldar Shafir Princeton University A0

  2. Wealth • Drives economic behavior and well-being • $1 ≠ $1 • Diminishing marginal utility (e.g. Bernoulli, 1738/1954) • Relative factors (e.g. Easterlin, 1974; Frank, 1999, 2007) • Conspicuous consumption (e.g. Veblen, 1899)

  3. Behavioral Insights • Malleable financial decisions • Choices driven by • Budgeting process (e.g., Heath & Soll, 1996) • Accessible accounts (Morewedge et al., 2007) • Current income(e.g., Thaler, 1999)

  4. Current Research • How do assets and debt factor into perceptions of wealth?

  5. Experiment 1Assets and Debt • Compare profiles with equal net worth • Within questions • “High” profile had high debt and high assets • “Low” profile had low debt and low assets • Across questions • Net Assets (“in the black”) • Net Debt (“in the red”)

  6. Experiment 1Assets and Debt • Net Assets • Bob has $11,000 in assets and $1,000 in debt (Low) • Jim has $20,000 in assets and $10,000 in debt (High) • Net Debt • Dave has $1,000 in assets and $11,000 in debt (Low) • Steve has $10,000 in assets and $20,000 in debt (High)

  7. Study 1a Who is better off financially? • Net Assets • Bob has $11,000 in assets and $1,000 in debt (Low) • Jim has $20,000 in assets and $10,000 in debt (High) • Both men have substantial access to credit. • Net Debt • Dave has $1,000 in assets and $11,000 in debt (Low) • Steve has $10,000 in assets and $20,000 in debt (High) • Both men have substantial access to credit.

  8. * * * * Study 1aResults * p < .001

  9. Study 1b Which situation would you rather be in? • Comparing two people in the black • 93% would rather have low debt and low assets • Comparing two people in the red • 66% would rather have high debt and high assets (p<.001)

  10. Experiment 1 • Who is better off financially? • Which situation would you rather be in?

  11. Experiment 2Financial Decision Making • Willingness to: • Borrow • Lend • Pay

  12. Study 2aWillingness to borrow • Would you be more likely to borrow to buy a [TV] if you had... • Choice between 2 profiles constructed as in Experiment 1

  13. Study 2aResults- I would borrow if… • Comparing two profiles in the black • 82% would borrow with the low profile • Comparing two profiles in the red • 64% would borrow with the high profile (p <.001)

  14. Study 2bWillingness to Lend • Do the same patterns apply to decisions that affect others? • Imagine you are a loan officer • Which applicant is in a better position to receive a loan? • Choice between 2 profiles constructed as in Experiment 1

  15. Study 2bResults- Who should receive the loan? • Comparing two profiles in the black • 75% say the person with the low profile • Comparing two profiles in the red • 74% say the person with the high profile (p <.001)

  16. Study 2cWillingness to pay • Imagine you have $X in assets and $Y in debt. What is the most you would pay for…? • Profiles presented sequentially • 4 profiles • Negative and positive net worth • High and low assets/debt

  17. * * Study 2cResults *p ≤ .02

  18. Experiment 3An attentional account • Economic “pop out”

  19. In the black… $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

  20. In the red… $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

  21. Study 3Direct measure of attention • Saw two wealth profile pairs with short personality descriptions • Attention measures • What are the first thoughts that come to mind? • Did assets or debt matter more?

  22. * * * Study 3Results- Attention * p <.01

  23. Summary 1. Who feels wealthier? 2. Who spends and borrows more? 3. Who pays attention to what?

  24. Alternate Accounts • Financial incentives • Ability to file for bankruptcy • Personality inferences

  25. Consequences • Perceived wealth  economic wealth • Impulses misaligned with financial interests

  26. Thank you

  27. Study 3aAsset and debt correlations • 2 ranking questions • 10 profiles each • +36,000 in the black • -$36,000 in the red • Varied amount of assets and debt

  28. Study 3aResults 1

  29. Study 1cPreference Reversals • Ranked 5 profiles • Who is best off financially? • 1=best to 5=worst • Profiles diverged by up to 27% • Varied levels of debt/ assets

  30. Study 1cResults * Pairwise comparison to top profile in set, all ps< .03

More Related