1 / 54

Introduction to Ecological Economics Greentax Sep. 7, 2004 Gary Flomenhoft-Gund Institute

Introduction to Ecological Economics Greentax Sep. 7, 2004 Gary Flomenhoft-Gund Institute. CIRCULAR FLOW MODEL OF ECONOMY. “EXTERNALITIES” SOCIETY . ?. ECONOMY. ?. ENVIRONMENT. Environment as subset of ECONOMY. NEO-CLASSICAL ECONOMICS 1890-. No Ingredients, only labor and capital

tyne
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction to Ecological Economics Greentax Sep. 7, 2004 Gary Flomenhoft-Gund Institute

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to Ecological Economics Greentax Sep. 7, 2004 Gary Flomenhoft-Gund Institute

  2. CIRCULAR FLOW MODEL OF ECONOMY “EXTERNALITIES” SOCIETY ? ECONOMY ? ENVIRONMENT

  3. Environment as subset of ECONOMY

  4. NEO-CLASSICAL ECONOMICS 1890- No Ingredients, only labor and capital P = f(L,K)= ALa. BKb (Cobb-Douglas multiplication) Labor (Chef ) = x Bread? X Capital (oven) Capital (Mixing bowl)

  5. NEO-CLASSICAL ECONOMICS INFINITE SUBSTITUTABILITY: 2P = f(L,K)= 2ALa. 2BKb More Chefs x = More Bread? or Bigger Mixing bowl

  6. Quotable Quotes • “There is no reason we can’t have a perfectly healthy economy with virtually no resources whatsoever” Robert Solow • “We can do without agriculture because it’s only 2% of the economy.” Norgaard? • “neo-classical economics is a form of brain damage” -- Hazel Henderson

  7. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMY NO “EXTERNALITIES”

  8. Intro to Ecological Economics Throughput-open system 1st Law: Conservation of mass (some) (waste) ECONOMY

  9. GREEN TAX SOURCES (some) ECONOMY (waste) 3 Ss: Sources Sub-surface Resources Sites Surface locations: ie: land Sinks Absorbtion of waste

  10. Intro to Ecological Economics Entropy=disorder, randomness 2nd Law: entropy always increases (waste) ECONOMY (dissipated) LOW ENTROPY HIGH ENTROPY

  11. Intro to Ecological Economics WHAT IS ANTI-ENTROPIC? (SYNTROPIC) (waste) ECONOMY LOW ENTROPY HIGH ENTROPY

  12. Intro to Ecological Economics Throughput-closed system earth ECONOMY

  13. SCALE-Full World or Empty World? Source: Ecological Economics Principles & Applications, Farley and Daly

  14. Marginal disutility

  15. Differences

  16. Sky-Trust model (some) ECONOMY (waste) Sources Sub-surface Resources GO UPSTREAM!

  17. Sky-Trust model Appendix : Key Features of U.S. Sky Trust Here are the key features of the proposed U.S. Sky Trust. o Carbon emissions cap set initially at 1.346 billion tons, the 1990 level o Tradable carbon emission permits sold annually to energy companies at the top of the carbon chain. o All revenue from permit sales goes into a nationwide trust. o Trust pays equal annual dividends to all U.S. citizens (like the Alaska Permanent Fund). o Dividends can be placed tax-free in Individual Retirement Accounts or Individual Development Accounts for children. o Initial price ceiling on carbon emission permits of $25 a ton; ceiling rises 7 percent a year for four years. o Transition Fund to help those most adversely affected by higher carbon prices. Fund starts at 25 percent of permit revenue, declines 2.5 percent per year.

  18. Governance

  19. Governance

  20. “Golden Rule of Publicly held companies: “Maximization of Shareholder Value” Rational behavior: Externalize costs Influence politics to Seek subsidies and favors “Invisible boot”

  21. Quotable Quotes “Altruism is evil and selfishness is a virtue.” -Ayn Rand “Few trends could so thoroughly undermine the very foundations of our free society as the acceptance by corporate officials of a social responsibility other than to make as much money for their stockholders as possible.” -Milton Friedman 1962 Enron, World Com, Tyco????

  22. Cost of regulations-OMB report Annual Cost: $37-43 billion EPA conservative approach, Consistently overestimates costs, not considering least cost approach and technical innovation Annual Benefits: $121-193 EPA consistently underestimates benefits USING ACTUAL NOT THEORETICAL CASES BENEFITS OUTWEIGH COSTS 5:1

  23. CONSILIENCE “~Resources are infinite and the economy can grow forever” -Julian Simon “Anyone who thinks you can have infinite growth on a finite planet is either a madman or an economist” Kenneth Boulding

  24. Intro to Ecological Economics Throughput-isolated system Universe

  25. Intro to Ecological Economics-human dev Growth=increase in throughput-quantitative Development Growth Development=qualitative improvement

  26. Intro to Ecological Economics-population Demographic transition Theory Development Growth

  27. Intro to Ecological Economics-population

  28. Intro to Ecological Economics-forest succession Development Growth Reorganization Aggredation Transition Steady-state (mature)

  29. We hear: “There is no conflict between economic growth and environmental protection!”

  30. GDP 1825: ~$200 BILLION 2000: $41,000 B ILLION OR $41 TRILLION =205X 1825 level.

  31. 60 Million yrs of CO2

  32. CLIMATE DAMAGE

  33. CLIMATE DAMAGE

  34. Europe in August 2003

  35. ESA Listings and GDP $10 $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 R2 = 98.4 1973 1980 1990 2001 Source: The Wildlife Society Technical Review 2003-1.

  36. Urbanization Agriculture Water diversions (e.g., reservoirs) Recreation, tourism development Pollution Domestic livestock, ranching 247 205 160 148 143 136 Endangerment Causes Czech et al. 2000. Bioscience 50(7):593-601.

  37. Mineral, gas, oil extraction Non-native species Harvest Modified fire regimes Road construction/maintenance Industrial development 134 115 101 83 83 81 Causes (cont.) Czech et al. 2000. Bioscience 50(7):593-601.

  38. Carrying Capacity Scenarios K K-selection Individuals r-selection Time

  39. K and r-selected Species

  40. K Natural capital allocated to wildlife GNP Natural capital allocated to human economy Time Czech, B. 2000. Economic growth as the limiting factor for wildlife conservation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28(1):4-14.

  41. Natural Capital “We treat the earth like a business in liquidation.” Herman Daly Opportunity cost. Loss is not counted.

  42. (OVERSHOOT) Economic Carrying Capacity (“Plimsoll line”) K K-selection GNP r-selection Time

  43. K and r-selected Economies

  44. We Might Ask K What happens here? Economy of nature GGP Human economy

  45. American GNP, 1929-1997 K or r-selected?

  46. Natural Capital Allocation Revisited KU X natural capital allocable KT Natural capital allocated to non-human economy GNP Natural capital allocated to human economy Time

  47. Distribution-Grow out of poverty?

More Related