1 / 5

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

This project explores effective meal provision strategies at RMPS through a systematic approach involving problem-solving, data analysis, and graphical representation. Utilizing algebraic methods, students will gather relevant data to support their hypotheses on meal delivery. The goals include writing systems of equations, displaying findings in simple graphs, and analyzing various constraints and outcomes. Formative assessments will facilitate group collaboration and progress monitoring, ensuring all groups achieve project milestones while enhancing understanding and self-direction.

vance-giles
Télécharger la présentation

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FOOD FOR THOUGHT What is the best way to provide meals at RMPS?

  2. Content Standards • Problem solving to gather data • Algebra to use the data • Graphical presentation to display the results of the data.

  3. Objectives • Use data to support a hypothesis • Write a system of equations using the data collected to support a conclusion • Display the data in a simple graph to support the conclusion

  4. Pre-Assessment • Data for the present • Variables • Goals for the future • Constraints • Possible outcomes

  5. Formative Assessments • Gauging needs: review similar situations • Encouraging self-direction: Have several groups begin the project together and reward groups as they meet milestones • Monitor progress: Have groups compare what they have discovered • Checking for understanding: Check the groups work using a rubric and comparing the groups

More Related