1 / 1

Development and Implementation of Stewardship Monitoring Indicators by Forest Practices Board

This report outlines the roles and responsibilities of the Forest Practices Board (FPB) in the development and implementation of indicators for evaluating resource stewardship effectiveness. The Forest Resource Evaluation Working Group (FREWG) identifies evaluation questions related to resource values and assigns Resource Value Team Leaders (RVTLs) to establish expert teams. These teams draft and revise indicators through stakeholder input and field testing. Ongoing improvements and public reporting are emphasized, aiming for enhanced accountability and better management practices across regional and provincial levels.

vanig
Télécharger la présentation

Development and Implementation of Stewardship Monitoring Indicators by Forest Practices Board

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Version 1.0 February 08, 2005 : FRPA Resource Evaluation Program and Forest Practices Board roles and responsibilities in the development and implementation of indicators for effectiveness evaluation/stewardship monitoring Start FP Board public report FREWG identifies specific evaluation question(s) by resource value FREWG assigns resource value team leaders • RVTLs create expert team (RVT) • multi-agency • academics • others RVT drafts indicators and field procedures RVT revise indicators and procedures FP Board Pilot audit FP develop indicators required to complete audit Field Test RVT team field test Stakeholder input FP expert RVT revisions to indicators and procedures Resource stewardship monitoring pilots Post Pilot de-briefing (FREWG) FREP/RSMP field implementation version of indicators and procedures FREP/RSMP Field implementation FP Board 2004 audit and public report • Data Analysis • district • regionial • provincial To date Future date Available for future FP Board use • Local continuous improvement through: • better FSP objectives and on the ground practices • informing professional accountability Ongoing field implementation and improvements • Regional continuous improvement through: • regional trends and issues • identify “red flags” • training and extension • quality management Public reporting Future audit/special investigation(s) Recommendations to government or licensees • Provincial continuous improvement through: • investigating red flags in detail • standardized protocols and process • modelling field data • communicate results and recommendations to policy table • improved legislation and policy FP Board Input to “policy table” Special report Legend: FREP FRPA Resource Evaluation Program RSMP Resource Stewardship Monitoring Program FREWG FRPA Resource Evaluation Program Working Group (MOF, WLAP, MSRM) FP Board Forest Practices Board RVTL Resource value team leader RVT Resource value team DDM Delegated decision maker

More Related