1 / 7

Working Group 9 EAS-CAP Migration Roadmap

Working Group 9 EAS-CAP Migration Roadmap. Chris Homer, Chair Ed Czarnecki, Co-Chair WG 9 – Alerting Issues Associated with CAP Migration. Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council. CSR C. CAP-EAS Roadmap – Basic Questions. Initial questions that WG9 is tackling:

vanya
Télécharger la présentation

Working Group 9 EAS-CAP Migration Roadmap

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Working Group 9 EAS-CAP Migration Roadmap Chris Homer, Chair Ed Czarnecki, Co-Chair WG 9 – Alerting Issues Associated with CAP Migration Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council CSR C

  2. CAP-EAS Roadmap – Basic Questions • Initial questions that WG9 is tackling: • What CAP-EAS Distribution Network architectures already exist at the Federal, state and local levels? • What are the physical and data components of these systems? • What prospective new architectures could be on the horizon? • What are the interface requirements for these systems?

  3. EAS Network Questions • Capacity • What is “sufficient” capacity to relay CAP messages, audio files, possibly multimedia efficiently? • Are redundant transport paths desirable and attainable? • Availability • How can access to data and service be made reliable and have low-latency? • Authentication • How to assure data comes from the appropriate source? • Data integrity and non-repudiation • How best to maintain the correctness/accuracy of data, protect against unauthorized modification, deletion, creation and replication, and provide audit trails? Can we identify any best practices? • Communication security • What best practices or measures are needed to ensure that information only flows between authorized end-points?

  4. EAS-CAP “State of the Feds” • The IPAWS OPEN CAP message aggregator v3.0 • up and operational in a production environment since 30 Sept. 2011 (capable of accepting and disseminating CAP messages to properly configured compatible CAP/EAS devices) • Minor upgrade to v3.01 is scheduled during week of 19 Dec. 2011 • IPAWS OPEN production system delivered its first series of CAP messages intended for CAP/EAS devices on Monday, 5 Dec. 2011. • Regularly scheduled CAP EAS Required Weekly Test messages • To be delivered by IPAWS OPEN during the 11 AM hour in each of 9 US time zones beginning 12 December 2011.

  5. EAS-CAP “State of the States” • Approximately 25 states are known to have contracted some form of CAP EAS origination/relay capability • At least 23 of these are either operational or in advanced pilot status. • At least 18 have “IPAWS-conformant” systems (i.e., with origination tools successfully completing IPAWS testing, with Declaration of Conformity) • Satellite & Internet are the dominant CAP distribution means • 17 states use satellite distribution (with or without Internet backup) • 6 states rely on Internet-only dissemination • Monitoring ranges from primary sites, to all sites • At least 2 states have formal EAS plans that refer to CAP monitoring capability • At least 2 states formally relay CAP messages to all EAS participants

  6. State CAP EAS Initiatives(estimate of contracted or piloted initiatives, as of 12-08-11) Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council CSR C

  7. WG9 – Subcommittee Progress • WG 9-1: CAP migration for IPAWS requirements • Obtained representation from FEMA IPAWS office onto subcommittee • Assigned subcommittee chair: Ed Czarnecki, Monroe Electronics • Scheduling first meeting • WG 9-2: CAP Migration for state/local system requirements • Assigned subcommittee chair: Gary Timm, Wisconsin SECC • WG 9-3: Next Steps in CAP Migration • Assigned subcommittee chair: Kelly Williams, National Association of Broadcasters

More Related