180 likes | 434 Vues
Observing Group Process. Observing Group Process. Observation Instruments Review of the Systems Approach. Observation Instruments. All of us benefit from periodic observation and feedback.
E N D
Observing Group Process • Observation Instruments • Review of the Systems Approach
Observation Instruments • All of us benefit from periodic observation and feedback. • The instruments that follow are designed to structure your observations in such a way as to help you learn more about how your group is performing.
Observation Instruments • All-Purpose Discussion Rating Scale Source: From Galanes, Adams, and Brilhart, 2000, p. 263.
Observation Instruments • Interaction Diagram Source: From Wilson, 2002, pp. 295-96.
Observation Instruments • Functional Task Roles of Discussants Source: From Wilson, 2002, p. 298. Based on K.D. Berne and P. Sheats (1948).
Observation Instruments • Functional Socio-Emotional Roles of Discussants Source: From Wilson, 2002, p. 301. Based on K.D. Berne and P. Sheats (1948).
Observation Instruments • Self-Centered Roles of Discussants Source: From Wilson, 2002, p. 301. Based on K.D. Berne and P. Sheats (1948).
Observation Instruments • Analyzing Group Process Source: From Huszczo, 1996, pp. 47-48.
Observation Instruments • Team Diagnostic Questionnaire Source: From Huszczo, 1996, pp. 43-45.
Observation Instruments • The Collaborative Team Leader-Leader Version Source: From LaFasto and Larson, 2001, p. 151.
Observation Instruments • The Collaborative Team Leader-Team Version Source: From LaFasto and Larson, 2001, p. 153.
Observation Instruments • Postmeeting Reaction Form Source: From Galanes, Adams, and Brilhart, 2000, p. 267.
Observation Instruments • Participant Rating Scale Form Source: From Galanes, Adams, and Brilhart, 2000, p. 267.
Observation Instruments • Progress Report on Group Interaction
Review of the Systems Approach • Analyzing Virtual Group Processes — Emerging Research • Group processes in virtual groups appear to mirror those of face-to-face group interactions in many cases, but continued research is needed to investigate the gentle nuances between the two group formats. • It is commonly thought that virtual groups can lack effectiveness in development of group member relationships etc.
Review of the Systems Approach • Analyzing Virtual Group Processes — Emerging Research • Balthazard, et al. (2004) studied the differences in processes between virtual teams and face-to-face teams. • It was concluded that it is true that virtual teams are more likely to suffer due to lack of sufficient relationship building between group members, resulting in trust and cohesion issues.
Review of the Systems Approach • The most effective way to behave either as a leader or as a participant in a group varies with the type of group and the group’s objectives. • The most important thing for you to do to improve competencies in small groups is to participate in numerous different types of groups and to get feedback on your performance.