1 / 10

REVIEW OF Bangladesh PDNA Process

REVIEW OF Bangladesh PDNA Process. Lessons Learned and Key Reflections. United Nations Development Programme. Cyclone Sidr (15 Nov 07). Cylone hit 30 districts 9 M people affected, 3M evacuated, 3,500 killed, 900 missing, 1.5 M houses damaged/destroyed, Embankments & infra damaged

varsha
Télécharger la présentation

REVIEW OF Bangladesh PDNA Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. REVIEW OF Bangladesh PDNA Process Lessons Learned and Key Reflections United Nations Development Programme

  2. Cyclone Sidr (15 Nov 07) Cylone hit 30 districts • 9 M people affected, • 3M evacuated, • 3,500 killed, 900 missing, • 1.5 M houses damaged/destroyed, • Embankments & infra damaged International (UN) response • “Clusters” roll out agreed by GoB • Included an ER Cluster • GoB: “No formal humanitarian appeal”

  3. ER Needs Assessment • ER themes established early in the response • ER Needs Asmt conducted jointly with the MoFDM, 2 day enumerators training (120 Enmrts, 6 dist, 3 wks, 50 FGDs, 150 HH itvs) • Broad participation by all clusters & NGO partners • GoB-led process: 1 year ER Action plan (ERAP) • GoB requested Dev partners to finance ERAP 360 M requirements. • Dec 08 • 6 -11: Inception, planning, instruments • 12-20: Field data collection • 22-26: Analysis & Report • Jan 7, 09: Nat Workshop • Feb 09: ERAP completed

  4. Joint Damage & Losses Needs Assessment (JDLNA) • Infrastructure • Housing • Transport • Power • Telecommunications • Water Supply and Sanitation • Urban and Municipal Infrastructure • Embankments and Water Control Structures • Social Sectors • Education • Health and Nutrition • Productive Sectors • Agriculture (Crops, Livestock, and Fisheries) • Industry, Commerce, and Tourism • Crosscutting Issues • Environment • WB was “requested” by GoB (Min of Finance) to lead a “joint” assessment • Deployed DaLA methodology, with new added component: ER • Mobilised some 30 sectoral external experts & hundreds of enumerators • Participated also by some UN agencies • Report was produced in April 2009 • Signed by WB & EC – minus the UN REQUIREMENTS (USD 5.3 Bn) ER : 360 Med & Long Term : 950 Risk Reduction : 4,000

  5. Proliferation of Assessments UN Rapid Assessment Report_Bangladesh Action Aid Bangladesh Needs Assessment UNESCO - World Heritage Centre Report SCG Sidr Shelter Conditions & Needs CARE Bangladesh - Rapid SIDR Gender Assesment Food security assessment-SIDR cyclone by WFP and partners Early recovery needs assessment Joint Damage, Losses, Needs Assessment Rapid environmental assessment in the cyclone-Sidr affected areaEffect of cyclone sidr on Sundarbans Emergency livelihood protection and rehabilitation programme appraisal Preliminary assessment of the impact on decent employment and proposed recovery strategy Rapid Education Assessment by Save the Children

  6. Lessons Learned • What worked? Effect of joint effort • Operating a multi-sectoral assessment involving clusters • Coherent scheme (sampling, organisation, recruitment, training, deployment) • Development of a full-blown instrumentation (HH itv, FGD, KII) • What didn’t work? Main constraints of joint approach. • WB team leader unaware of the existing inter-institutional commitment • Different government agencies drove different agenda • The turfing was too strong to reconcile despite efforts towards integration

  7. Lessons Learned • Reflections on improving relationship between partner agencies, communications, logistics, decision making, etc. • Should have run it as multi-cluster assessment from the UNRC Office instead of as ER Cluster / UNDP programme • Should have used more leverage at HQ level to deal with WB • How much did your institution invest in the PDNA (financial, technical, logistical, resources)? • Trac 3.1.1 up to USD 100 K • Counterpart contributions from partner agencies • ER Advisor to UNRC, ER Coord./Asmnt. Specialist, ER Advisor • Sectoral follow through assessments • Livelihood, environment, agriculture, education

  8. Lessons Learned Cont. • Utility of the recovery framework? • GoB ambivalent position re appeal • Competing scheme confused the donors • 12 Month ER Action Plan served more as programmatic advocacy tool • Cyclone Nargis took the spotllight away from BDesh • What is the ability to monitor the recovery framework? • UNDP and MoFDM followed through the ERAP • Have best practices been identified, institutionalized and shared? • UNCT lessons learnt workshop, March 2008 • After-Action Review conducted involving Dhaka/Bangkok/NY/GVA • Other major issues raised by assessment process • No readily available models and tools • UN assessments in isolation did not work well

  9. Relationship of assessment and therecovery process • What recovery strategies have been undertaken since the crisis? • GoB’s Early Recovery Action Plan • United Nations Early Recovery Framework • How much has been invested in recovery? • Nature of relationship between assessments undertaken/PDNA recovery framework developed and actual strategies and investments? • Documentation of recovery activities: existence/effectiveness of monitoring system? • Do recovery needs persist that require further assessment and investment?

More Related