1 / 18

Bibliographic Database Management Software for Every Student, Embedded into the CMS

Bibliographic Database Management Software for Every Student, Embedded into the CMS. Brian Nielsen b-nielsen@northwestern.edu. Agenda. The software project: Blackboard and RefWorks Linking Technical problems addressed Possible learning applications

velma
Télécharger la présentation

Bibliographic Database Management Software for Every Student, Embedded into the CMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bibliographic Database Management Software for Every Student, Embedded into the CMS Brian Nielsen b-nielsen@northwestern.edu

  2. Agenda • The software project: Blackboard and RefWorks Linking • Technical problems addressed • Possible learning applications • What does this experiment suggest for other possible tool/CMS associations?

  3. Where Do We Need to Be? McLean & Lynch, “Interoperability between Library Information Services and Learning Environments – Bridging the Gaps,” IMS & CNI, May 2004: Any analysis of library service interactions with learning systems environments must take into account the potential transformation of learning activity. http://www.imsglobal.org/digitalrepositories/CNIandIMS_2004.pdf

  4. And . . . Much of the current thinking is based on a fairly library-centric view of being able to “push” information resources into the LMS. There has been little thought given to the learner activity perspective where the learner may wish to draw on any number of information resources either prescribed, or of his or her choosing, at any given moment in the learning activity. It is important that the library communities engage in some quite lateral thinking with regard to potential service provision in the emerging interactive learning environments.

  5. Blackboard and Refworks • Blackboard’s API (“buildingblocks”) • RefWorks: developed by one of the original developers of ReferenceManager (ISI product) • Northwestern’s BDMS evaluation project, Summer 2002: ISI products and the RefWorks option

  6. The RefWorks Interface

  7. The RefWorks Interface

  8. The RefWorks Interface

  9. RefWorks Within Blackboard

  10. RefWorks Within Blackboard

  11. RefWorks Capabilities • Citation management • Bibliography creation through interoperability with MS Word (the “Write-N-Cite” plugin) • Z39.50 search interface for catalogs and indexes • Data import from online sources, search dumps • Exports in ISI and other formats

  12. Technical Issues Addressed • Pre-existing RefWorks accounts (not many) • Potential ongoing use of RefWorks independently of Blackboard • RefWorks can support multiple accounts for an individual (for read-only access)

  13. Resolution

  14. Other Possible Learning Applications

  15. Help for the Instructor (!)

  16. Thinking . . . Much of the current thinking is based on a fairly library-centric view of being able to “push” information resources into the LMS. There has been little thought given to the learner activity perspective where the learner may wish to draw on any number of information resources either prescribed, or of his or her choosing, at any given moment in the learning activity. It is important that the library communities engage in some quite lateral thinking with regard to potential service provision in the emerging interactive learning environments.

  17. Ideas? • Personal libraries (Cliff’s talk yesterday) • Annotation • Note taking and “clipping” (OneNote, NetSnippets, etc.) • Institutional support for chat • More robust and student-configurable server resources (for data collection, storage, group collaborations, …)

  18. Q & A

More Related