1 / 24

Effects of Zoning on Rural Land

Effects of Zoning on Rural Land. Lori Garkovich Professor, Extension Rural Sociologist Department of Community and Leadership Development University of Kentucky November, 2003. What is rural zoning?.

venedict
Télécharger la présentation

Effects of Zoning on Rural Land

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effects of Zoning on Rural Land Lori Garkovich Professor, Extension Rural Sociologist Department of Community and Leadership Development University of Kentucky November, 2003

  2. What is rural zoning? • Governmental regulations or ordinances designed to ensure the orderly and managed use of land outside of municipal boundaries • Thus, rural zoning influences the use of land in the open country or areas traditionally dominated by agricultural or other natural resource uses

  3. Advantages of rural zoning • Provides opportunities for industrial or commercial growth by reserving adequate and desirable sites • Protect rural areas from becoming “dumping grounds” for highly regulated businesses often defined as “undesirable” • Protect property owners from harmful or undesirable uses on adjacent property

  4. Advantages of rural zoning • Deters objections to normal and necessary agricultural practices as well as industrial activities by identifying areas where they are and will be in the future • Enhances the attractiveness of a community by preserving open space as well as unique natural and cultural resources • Is a tool for implementing a vision for the future of the area

  5. Advantages of rural zoning • Perhaps the most important advantage of rural zoning is that the county that does not have zoning in a region where others do will experience a substantially higher rate of urban growth than in the counties with zoning • Moreover, a proportion of this urban growth will be growth that is defined as “undesirable” by surrounding counties

  6. Disadvantages of rural zoning • Perceived as an unreasonable intrusion on individual property rights and individual choices on how their land is used • Seen to limit opportunities for property owners to gain full economic advantage from their property • May be used to limit particular agricultural practices that others define as undesirable

  7. Agriculture and rural zoning • In many rural places with zoning, setback and buffer requirements have been adopted to regulate particular agricultural uses • Setback requirements establish a mandatory distance from property lines for the siting of facilities • Buffer requirements establish a mandatory visual disruption of line of sight between roads and/or adjacent property and particular land uses • These requirements have been applied to livestock confinement facilities, waste lagoon ponds, breeding sheds

  8. Agriculture and rural zoning • Rural zoning ordinances have also been used to try and prevent the expansion of farm facilities or a change in farm practices (e.g., to prevent the construction and operation of confined breeding or feeding facilities) • Whether the use of zoning and setback ordinances to limit particular agricultural practices is legal depends on factors such as the intention behind the adoption of the ordinance, the impact of the ordinance on the economic use of the property, or customary farming practices in the area

  9. Agriculture and rural zoning • In areas with rural zoning, it is critical to ensure that the ordinances permit diversification of farm enterprises, even into activities not traditionally associated with agricultural zones • For example, for agri-tourism to succeed, farmers must be able to establish on-farm retail sales, value-added production facilities, and other activities that increase the resource-based earnings capacity of their farms

  10. Approaches to rural zoning • In most cases, communities have approached rural zoning in the same ways as urban places – minimum lot sizes, single use zones, subdivision regulations, and the presumption that everyone has the right to develop • What this has led to is development patterns that have been costly to the community and led to a dramatic decline in non-urban lands

  11. The failure of traditional zoning • “The standard zoning laws and subdivision regulations are a recipe for suburbanization,. They produce large-scale, monotonous residential subdivisions that obliterate the rural landscape, punctuated by sterile shopping malls and office parks, all connected by a massive network of pavement with immense parking lots” • Russell, 1996

  12. The failure of traditional zoning • A typical approach to rural zoning is to establish minimum lot sizes of 1, 5, 10, or more acres on the presumption that minimum lot sizes reduce residential development pressures • But residential lots continue to populate agricultural areas and realistically…. • What is the difference between a subdivision of 40 houses at 4 houses per acre and one of 40 houses at 1 house per 5 acres? 190 acres of land converted to residential use! • Large lot zoning only insures that every available acre will be converted into the familiar pattern of cookie-cutter subdivisions and strip malls

  13. The failure of zoning • "Our zoning laws are essentially a manual of instructions for creating the stuff of our communities.... What zoning produces is suburban sprawl, which must be understood as the product of a particular set of instructions. Its chief characteristics are the strict separation of human activities, mandatory driving to get from one activity to another, and huge supplies of free parking. After all, the basic idea of zoning is that every activity demands a separate zone of its own. For people to live around shopping would be harmful and indecent. Better not even to allow them within walking distance of it."James Howard Kunstler, Home From Nowhere, 1993

  14. Why does traditional rural zoning fail? • Rural community master plans are a blueprint for a future of: • Growth concentrated around existing towns, villages or hamlets, • Maintaining commercially viable downtowns and, • Protecting the rural “character” of the country • But traditional zoning is based on strategies appropriate for an urban place – segregation of uses due to close proximity and standardized development – which are not appropriate for rural places and will not make real the master plans

  15. Innovative rural zoning • In a rural area, which is more important? A form that fits into the landscape in design and scale? Or, the use of the land regardless of the design and scale of the building in which it occurs? • In a rural area, which would be more appropriate? Hamlets or villages of high density surrounded by large tracts of very low density? Or, large tracts of land with the same density levels, but all are developed to a degree?

  16. The rural zoning challenge • “Master plans articulate the community’s goals. Zoning laws apply these goals to the sometimes conflicting claims of private property rights. This explains why master plans say agricultural land should be preserved while zoning laws prescribe cookie cutter development….Are there other ways to regulate and use land so that the countryside’s rural, agricultural, and natural character can be maintained…? • Russell, 1996

  17. Innovative rural zoning • Sliding scale zoning wherein larger parcels have much lower development densities than small tracts • Smaller minimum lot sizes • Rural residential clusters • Mixed use agricultural or rural zones that permit professional, business, commercial uses within limits of scale and impact

  18. Innovative rural zoning • Designate village or hamlet areas with very small lot minimums, multi- and single-family housing, business zoning, and multi-use buildings • Establish preservation overlay zones where protective regulations also apply (i.e., those related to sensitive natural environments, cultural heritage) • Emphasize design standards rather than use standards and combine with low density in very rural areas

  19. Innovative rural zoning • In Lancaster CA, developers can build wherever they want – as long as they pay a premium for moving further from town • The Urban Structure Program (USP) shifts the costs of new public facilities and services to the developments that require them • A computer model assesses impact fees, including a “distance surcharge”

  20. Innovative rural zoning • The USP calculates development impact fees for 3 types of public expenditures: • Infrastructure – roads, signs, drainage/flood projects • Facilities – parks, libraries, police and fire stations, administrative offices • Operating costs – the projected 20 year cost of public services such as police and fire protection, public works, recreation and community development programs • Projects located far from existing services pay an additional fee based on the actual distance between the new development and the nearest existing facility/service

  21. Innovative rural zoning • Lancaster CA also established measurable performance objectives for public facilities and services (e.g., 3 acres of public park land per 1,000 users) to ensure a high quality of life • As a local official noted this is not a traditional growth management tool…”It’s more of a financial approach than a planning approach”

  22. Summary and conclusions • If rural zoning is to succeed in preserving the rural and agricultural character of places, we must abandon the assumptions underlying traditional zoning and subdivision ordinances • Equally important, efforts to concentrate growth in small villages or hamlets can help mitigate the financial costs of sprawl on local governments

  23. Summary and conclusions • If local governments do not provide landowners economically viable alternatives to intensive subdivision development, this is what we will get • “Unless the new generation of rural zoning laws abandons the suburban models that have been used previously, we will only get large-lot exurban supersprawl, not a settlement pattern that meets the needs of rural communities.” Russell, 1996

  24. References • Brownstone, D. and A. DeVany. 1991. Zoning, returns to scale and the value of undeveloped land. The Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol 73 (4): 699-704. • Hsieh, Wen-hua, E.G. Irwin, L.W. Libby. 2001. The effect of rural zoning on the allocation of land use in Ohio. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association meeting, Chicago. • Feitelson, E. 1993. The spatial effects of land use regulations: A missing link in growth control evaluations. Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol 59 (4):461-472. • Hackman, D. • 1996a. How are courts around the country addressing agricultural land use issues? http://agebb.missouri.edu/aglaw/zone/aglaw2b.htm • 1996b. Are set-back for agricultural use constitutional? http://agebb.missouri.edu/aglaw/zone/aglaw1b.htm • Ohio State University Fact Sheet. Rural zoning purpose and definition. Community Development Fact Sheet #CDFS-300. http://ohioline.osu.edu/cd-fact/0300.html • Russell, J. 1996. The need for new models of rural zoning. Zoning News, American Planning Association. June

More Related