1 / 10

Confidence Rating of Marine Eutrophication Assessments

Confidence Rating of Marine Eutrophication Assessments. CONFIRM Workshop, Copenhagen 6 th March 2009. Ciarán Murray, DHI. Confidence Rating. Based on scoring of indicators RefCon, AcDev, and AcStat, are scored with respect to: extraordinary quality

vernon-rowland
Télécharger la présentation

Confidence Rating of Marine Eutrophication Assessments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Confidence Rating of Marine Eutrophication Assessments CONFIRM Workshop, Copenhagen 6thMarch 2009 Ciarán Murray, DHI

  2. Confidence Rating • Based on scoring of indicators • RefCon, AcDev, and AcStat, are scored with respect to: • extraordinary quality • acceptable quality ‘indicator confidence’ • poor quality • ‘Indicator confidence’ is combined per quality element • Quality elements are combined into a interim ’confidence assessment’: • Class I = 100-75% = extraordinary quality • Class II = 75-50% = acceptable quality • Class III = 50-0% = poor quality

  3. Scoring an Indicator

  4. Indicator Confidence From scores to indicator confidence rating

  5. Quality Element Confidence From Indicator to Quality Element confidence rating …including Indicator weighting

  6. Overall Confidence Assessment Confidence for Quality Elements combined To give overall assessment • Class I = 100-75% = extraordinary quality • Class II = 75-50% = acceptable quality • Class III = 50-0% = poor quality

  7. Overall Confidence Assessment Another example… • Class I = 100-75% = extraordinary quality • Class II = 75-50% = acceptable quality • Class III = 50-0% = poor quality

  8. Only 1 indicator? A quality element with only 1 indicator has a reduced confidence rating. Reduction -25%

  9. Only 1 Quality Element With only 1 quality element the overall confidence rating is reduced. Reduction -50%

  10. Confidence Rating • …any questions? Reference Conditions (RefCon) Confidence Score Acceptable Deviation (AcDev) Confidence Score Actual Status (AcStat) Confidence Score Indicator Confidence Rating (Ind_Conf) Quality Element Confidence Rating (QE_Conf) Final Confidence Rating

More Related