1 / 28

WP 1 leader: Universität Karlsruhe (TH), TMB/FM Prof. Dr.-Ing. Kunibert Lennerts

COMPETITIVE and SUSTAINABLE GROWTH PROGRAMME. THEMATIC NETWORK LIFETIME - WP1: Best practice and knowledge of lifetime engineering final presentation. WP 1 leader: Universität Karlsruhe (TH), TMB/FM Prof. Dr.-Ing. Kunibert Lennerts Dipl.-Ing. Karin Diez.

vesna
Télécharger la présentation

WP 1 leader: Universität Karlsruhe (TH), TMB/FM Prof. Dr.-Ing. Kunibert Lennerts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. COMPETITIVE and SUSTAINABLE GROWTH PROGRAMME THEMATIC NETWORK LIFETIME- WP1: Best practice and knowledge of lifetime engineeringfinal presentation WP 1 leader: Universität Karlsruhe (TH), TMB/FM Prof. Dr.-Ing. Kunibert Lennerts Dipl.-Ing. Karin Diez

  2. WP 1: Best practice and knowledge of lifetime engineering • Working steps • Questionnaire sent out in August 2002 • Follow up questionnaire sent out in November 2002 • Design of a database on basis of results of questionnaires • Second call for data in May 2004 to NDG Leaders • Refinement of database • Upload of database into Netspace for Member’s use • Analysis and Benchmarking of data

  3. Task 1: Exploring and benchmarking of best practices WP 1: tasks Task 2: Listing of competencies and current practices Task 5: Concluding state of the art in R&D, dissemination, exploitation, education and training structured database Task 3: identifying gaps in competence, education and training Task 6: Collecting and finishing Deliverable 1 Task 4: identifying gaps in transfer activities Keywords

  4. WP 1: 2nd call for data research projects – example excel sheet Sent out to all NDG leaders

  5. WP 1: 2nd call for data research projects – example: completed data Name of Project: OPIK Participants: Universität Karlsruhe, TMB-FM; several hospitals Start: 2000 End: 2003 Short description: processes in hosptials, benchmarking Website: www.facility-management.uni-karlsruhe.de Keywords out of list: 3,5,7,23 Keyword own definition (optional): benchmarking Area (Buildings, Infrastructures, B&I): Buildings Language: German Partners from industry (Y/N): Y Product development (Y/N): N ID-Country, member, ID-Project: Germany, 5, 1

  6. WP 1: 2nd call for data Educational courses – example excel sheet Sent out to all NDG leaders

  7. WP 1: 2nd call for data Educational courses – example: completed data Name of Course: Life cycle engineering of buildings Member: 64 Area (Buildings, Infrastructures, B&I): Buildings Language: Finnish ID-Country: 8 Finland Institution giving course: Helsinki University of Technology/Structural engineering and building physics Keywords out of list: 1, 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 25, 29

  8. WP 1: 2nd call for data Training courses – example excel sheet Sent out to all NDG leaders

  9. WP 1: 2nd call for data Training courses – example: completed data Name of Course: Plumbing and Heating Institution giving course: FAS Training Centre, Baldoyle, Dublin 13 Member: 82 Area (Buildings, Infrastructures, B&I): Buildings ID-Country: Ireland Language: English Keywords out of list: 8, 10, 15, 25, 31, 34

  10. WP 1: 2nd call for data ACCESS database Why using ACCESS? challange: - Complex data from different sources - relationship of data (1:1; n:m) - need for a searching function Access provides all possibilities for the design of a well structured database.

  11. Database Structure • Structured searching routines can be executed in terms of: • research projects • educational courses • training courses • standards, handbooks •  All data is referenced to: • keyword • country • language • member responsible for data / contact address

  12. Database Queries Example: Query on educational courses for language shall be German

  13. Database Queries Example: Query on educational courses for language shall be English

  14. Database Queries Example: Query on educational courses for language shall be German and keyword shall be “3 whole life costing”.

  15. Benchmarking • The data collected in the database concerning research, education and training has been benchmarked under the following aspects: • competence (keywords and main topics) • general • national • gaps (keywords and main topics) • general • national • Transfer of research into praxis • Procedure: Each entry in the database is referenced to one or more keywords. In terms of benchmarking we are comparing how many times the keywords have been named to reference the entries.

  16. Definition Competence Centres - Gaps • We define competence within the Lifetime Network on basis of the following aspects: • A search in the database to one of those topics will give a good starting point and contacts for further investigation • new research can build on published work • Education / Training can be derived • We define gaps within the Lifetime Network on basis of the following aspects: • A search in the database to one of those topics gives very little or none results • education or training is (nearly) not available

  17. Benchmarking to Use of keywords for Research Projects At this state of the project there are 293 entries listed in the database. The middle value of the “Use of keyword” of all keywords is 19. The standard deviation is 14 where the minimal value is 3 and the maximal value is 60. We take a closer look at all keywords where the Use of keyword is over 30 or under 8.

  18. Competence Centres • Keywords named more often than 30 times (Use of keyword >30): • 1 investment planning (50) • 100 lifetime design (48) • 14 economy of nature, environmental impact assessment technology (45) • 300 recycling technology (43) • 400 lifetime management and maintenance (60) • 24 modernisation planning and execution (32) • 21 maintenance planning and execution (32) • 45 optimisation of materials and components (35)

  19. Gaps • Keywords that are underrepresented (Use of keyword <8): • 13 multiple attribute decision making (e. g. MADA) (5) • 18 selective demolition for recycling (7) • 23 “Infrastructural management” (security, cleaning) (4) • 25 analysis of the requirements of owner/user (e. g. QFD method) (5) • 28 network (=total sample of the managed objects) planning (5) • 500 Culture (5) • 31 Building traditions (5) • 32 Life style (5) • 33 Business culture (5) • 34 Aesthetics (6) • 35 Architectural styles and trends (3) • 36 Image (5) • 39 sustainable city/regional planning (5)

  20. Benchmarking to use of keywords per country Amount of data for each country available in the database

  21. Use of keywords for all countries Use of keywords for each country’s research projects; at the same time the summed up use of keywords for all countries. We can derive for which keywords there seem to be existing competence centres and at the same time we can allocate them. Further investigation is possible via searching routine in database

  22. Transfer from research into praxis From 293 projects in total we have information about involvement of industry partners only for 98 projects. The share of projects where industry partners are involved is 65%.

  23. Benchmarking to Use of keywords for Education At this state of the project 109 educational courses are listed in the database. The middle value of the “Use of keyword” of all keywords is 5,9. The standard deviation is 4,2 where the minimal value is 0 and the maximal value is 20. We take a closer look at all keywords where the Use of keyword is over 10 or under 2.

  24. Competence Centres • Keywords named more often than 10 times (Use of keyword >10): • 1 Investment planning (12) • 3 Whole life costing (11) • 6 Performance data of materials and products (13) • 7 Service life planning (11) • 8 Durability limit states and service life design (12) • 13 Energy efficiency in use (15) • 21 maintenance planning and execution(20) • 24 modernisation planning and execution (14)

  25. Gaps • Keywords that are underrepresented (Use of keyword <2): • 500 Culture (1) • 31 Building traditions (1) • 32 Life style (1) • 33 Business culture (1) • 37 thematic network (0)

  26. Benchmarking to Use of keywords for Training At this state of the project 83 training courses are listed in the database. The middle value of the “Use of keyword” of all keywords is 4,5. The standard deviation is 4,4 where the minimal value is 0 and the maximal value is 16. We take a closer look at all keywords where the Use of keyword is over 9 or under 1.

  27. Competence Centres • Keywords named more often than 9 times (Use of keyword >9): • 1 Investment planning (15) • 7 Service life planning(12) • 14 Economy of nature, environmental impact assessment technology (12) • 15 Energy efficiency in use (15) • 21 Maintenance planning and execution (16) • 23 Infrastructural management (security, cleaning) (10)

  28. Gaps • Keywords that are underrepresented (Use of keyword <1): • 4 usability, functionality and obsolescence analysis and design (0) • 12 design for reuse (0) • 28 network planning (0) • 29 multiple attribute decision making (0) • 32 Life style (0) • 33 Business culture (0) • 35 Architectural styles and trends (0) • 36 Image (0) • 37 thematic network (0)

More Related