330 likes | 452 Vues
This presentation discusses the successful strategies employed by the Banks Peninsula Conservation Trust to engage communities in biodiversity conservation. It highlights the significant challenges faced, particularly the control of invasive predators threatening native species, and underscores the importance of collaboration between local landowners, ecologists, and organizations. By leveraging local knowledge and facilitating impactful conservation projects, the Trust has made notable progress in protecting and restoring the region's unique ecosystems. Key takeaways include insights on the mix of strategies needed and the vital role of community involvement.
E N D
Ecologists in action – working with communities the better way to skin a cat? Ecology in Action Award, NZ Ecological Society Conference 2008, Auckland Frances Schmechel, PGDip, PhD
Outline • Context • Banks Peninsula Conservation Trust • example • benefits • Observations and recommendations • Best way to skin a cat? (e.g. predator control) • do it OR • support community / landowners to do it
Context • Large proportion of threatened biodiversity is on private land implications • Best opportunities to experience ecology are near home • Real tensions between regulations and voluntary methods • Mix of tools needed • The greatest threat to native fauna – introduced predators
Banks Peninsula – background • 100,500 ha • Rich biodiversity • isolated • endemics • southern limit • Originally almost all forest • Now • <1% original forest • 15% regenerating forest • sheep grazing facilitative
Map of Combined Native & Endemic Bird Taxa A 1 Average Number of Taxa 56
Current fauna • White-flippered penguin has declined 60-70% since 1980 (predators) • Sooty shearwater very rare • Native bats and weka have disappeared • Tūī virtually gone
History of Banks Peninsula Conservation Trust (BPCT) • BPDC Proposed District Plan - Jan 1997 • Task Force recommendations - Sep 1999 • Variation to District Plan • Formation of Trust commenced - Apr 2001 • Trust registered - Oct 2001 • Covenanting authority - May 2003
Aim of Banks Peninsula Conservation Trust To promote conservation and long term sustainable management on private land
Structure • Management committee (implementation / finances) • Subcommittees: Restoration, Projects (covenants), Funding, Communications
Structure • Staff • Coordinator* (3 days/wk since 2003) • Projects / covenant officer (2-3 days/wk since 2005) • Accounts (1 day/mo since 2006) • Ecologist (1-3 day/wk since 2007) • Tui Project coordinator (1 day/wk since 2007) • Board of Trustees (oversight) * Originally ecologist, now separate positions
Accomplishments • Covenants: 35 areas (> 300 ha)
Accomplishments • Feral goat eradication – final stages (3375 goats since 2003)
Accomplishments • Advocacy, education and networks • Field Days • Workshops • Mustelid control (2003) • Rare plants (2004) • Lizards x 2 (2005)
Advocacy, education and networks Community biodiversity days Rapaki 2004 Akaroa 2005 Little River 2006 Newsletter, email networks stands at A&P shows email networks Accomplishments
Accomplishments • Weed control (covenants, reserves, etc) • Wetland restoration • Banks Peninsula Conservation Forum • Tui restoration project coordinator • Environmental awards
Partnerships • Ngāi Tahu • Councils • DOC • Other NGOs • QEII • Lincoln University • Landcare Research
Synergies • Tui restoration group • Wild Side (predator control) • Governors Bay Landcare Group • Upper Akaroa Predator Control Group • Kaupapa Kererū – research partnership • Community Initiated Possum Control Program • Hinewai • Weta Watchers (tree weta monitoring program)
Support • Landcare Trust (especially 2001 – 2007) • Facilitation • Offices / administrative support • Initial funding application for coordinator • Anderson Lloyd Caudwell (legal firm) • Legal (covenants / registration) • Trustee • Partners
Funding / support • Biodiversity Advice Fund & Condition Fund • Canterbury Community Trust (salary) • WWF-HPF (partnership, tools, workshop) • Pacific Development & Conservation Fund (aka Greenpeace / Rainbow Warrior Fund) • Environmental Enhancement Fund (ECan) • Transpower Landcare Fund • Christchurch City Council • Others
Elements of success • Committed, skilled volunteers / chair • Facilitation / administration / support Support by business • Funding • Support / participation by other agencies and organizations • Ecologists’ support
Benefits • Funding leverage and value for money • Time • Skills • Local knowledge & wisdom • Passion for education / advocacy • Leadership and coordination (bring agencies together) • Synergies & models
Benefits • Growth of • local capacity • ecological understanding • support for conservation • ‘infrastructure’ (e.g. communications networks) • Significant economic and social benefits – ‘Not Just Trees in the Ground’ WWF 2007
Potential disadvantages - general • Funding • Volunteers – limits of skills / time • Efficiency • Personalities • Varying agendas (ecological input valuable) • Skills needed (requires people skills) • Duplication • Potential to distract from optimal mix of policy tools (?)
Observations • Interest in ecology very high • Demand outstrips supply • Some excellent resources – (thank you!) • Hugh Wilson, ecologist & manager Hinewai • Websites (NZPCN - plants, Sanctuaries – pest control links, What Bird?, Weedbusters) • Newsletters of research results (tui, magpie) • Resources / tools (FORMAK, WWF monitoring tool kit)
Recommendations - general • Ecological advice can be as, or more, important than funding • Finding of research with Canterbury farmers • Supported by literature review • Wetland in Marlborough SwampFever by Gerard Hindmarsh • But flip side
Recommendations - general • Ecologists / researchers / students • Provide feedback and report results • Make results understandable and available (e.g. newsletters, advice sheets, summaries) • Funders, consider: • how created information will be shared • monitoring (require / build into funding allowance) • administration / coordination needs • salaries / timeframes
Recommendations - general • Councils – work programs • consider options that include or support community groups, e.g. • predator control • monitoring • Keep in mind context • mix of tools most effective • each can be very effective if used well
Acknowledgements • BPCT management committee & trustees • NZ Landcare Trust • Funders • Anderson Lloyd (Mark Christensen) • Hugh Wilson, Marieke Lettink, and many others • OnlineGroups.Net (Banks Diversity) • Environment Canterbury • Department of Conservation • Christchurch City Council • Ngāi Tahu • QEII, Summit Road Society, OSNZ, and Governors Bay Landcare Group • NZ Ecological Society
NZ Dotterel Watch • Partnership (DOC & mining company) • Network of volunteer dotterel minders • Effective - between 1996 and 2004 increase of 102 birds (58%) • Two key roles / positions: • Coordinator • Technical advice • NZ Dotterel Protection workshop (yearly) Reference: Management of northern NZ Dotterels on Coromandel Peninsula (2006) J.E. Dowding
Significant Natural Areas • Full loop (Marlborough, Kaikoura, others?) • Survey -> report -> recommendations to landowners -> implementation (funding) -> monitoring • Context / support: • Advisory group • Communications (newsletter, media) & advocacy • Landowner liaison • Funding leverage (outside funding sought)
Significant Natural Areas • Partnerships or split models • Banks Peninsula • Implementation (based on PNA reports, Hugh Wilson), monitoring, communications, advocacy – BPCT • Surveys – CCC • Selwyn • Surveys, reports, implementation funding – SDC / NZLCT • Implementation assistance, monitoring, communications, advocacy - ? (TAK:GC)
Ecologist as coordinator • Biodiversity – specific • Newsletter articles • Projects • Advice • Workshops • Agencies • Funding • Networks • Conference info • Papers