1 / 5

Creating Cultural Heritage

Creating Cultural Heritage. Nicolas Peterson Australian National University. Cultural landscapes Appreciation of landscape developed 16-19 th centuries (Raymond Williams 1972) Focus on idea of nature: With expansion of agriculture and growth of industrial revolution

vian
Télécharger la présentation

Creating Cultural Heritage

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Creating Cultural Heritage Nicolas Peterson Australian National University

  2. Cultural landscapes • Appreciation of landscape developed 16-19th centuries (Raymond Williams 1972) • Focus on idea of nature: • With expansion of agriculture and growth of industrial revolution • Which brought increased intervention in ‘nature’ entailing the separation from it (ie facilitated development of a binary contrast nature-culture • Led to growing appreciation of the countryside as spectacle to be enjoyed • Hence emphasis on landscape painting • Key work by the historian W.G. Hoskings. 1955. ‘The making of the English landscape’ • Not clear when ‘cultural landscape’ as term first used but an early user: Carl Sauer (1963:343)

  3. Although, of course anthropologists, geographers and historians long writing about aspects of this in various ways • Became internationally significant 1993: • UNESCO World Heritage listing criteria expanded to recognised: ASSOCIATIVE LANDSCAPES • 1990 Tongariro National Park listed for natural values (cultural mentioned) • 1193 resubmitted under new associative (cultural) criteria • Recognition of cultural criteria ‘justifiable by virtue of the powerful religious, artistic or cultural associations of the natural elements rather than material cultural evidence which may be insignificant or absent’ • Uluru • 1987 listed for natural values • 1994 Re-inscribed on World Heritage list as an associative landscape: The second place to be included on the list!

  4. Cultural v Social Mapping • Cultural mapping: • HABITAT MAPPING: Social, economic and political relations • ARETFACT MAPPING: Modifications to landscape • IDEATIONAL MAPPING: How the landscape is saturated with meaning • PLACE MAPPING: Space as a location for human actions Not static: process a key aspect of its significance • Social mapping: • Comes from development literature • Collecting information about customary land and resource use and ownership • Plus associated social structure and groupings Differs from an ethnographic monograph account because not driven by theoretical concerns and to serve a non-academic readership

  5. References • L. Goldman 2000. Social mapping. In Social impact analysis: an applied anthropology manual (ed) L. Goldman. Oxford: Berg. • R. Layton and S. Titchen 1995. Uluru: outstanding Australian Aboriginal cultural landscape. In Cultural landscapes of universal value (eds) B. Von Droste, H. Plachter and M. Rossler . Germany: Gustav Fischer. • C. Sauer. 1963. The morphology of landscape. In Land and life: a selection of the writings of Carl Sauer (ed) J. Leighly. Berkeley: University of California Press. • N. White. Meaning and metaphor in Yolngu landscapes, Arnhem Land , northern Australia. In Disputed territories: land culture and identity in settler societies (eds) D. Trigger and G. Griffith. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. • R. Williams. 1972. Ideas of nature. In Ecology, the shaping of inquiry (ed) J. Benthall. London: Longmans.

More Related