200 likes | 337 Vues
As Concordia University Texas begins its 87th year, we explore the critical concept of leadership accountability. This principle not only defines trust but also enhances decision-making in challenging situations. We delve into what accountability means for leaders and followers alike, examining the importance of decision-making processes in strategic, operational, and tactical contexts. By empowering individuals, fostering Christian leadership, and removing fears, we equip our leaders to face challenges courageously, ensuring the university's mission is fulfilled.
E N D
Concordia University Texas Beginning our 87thyear 1926-2013
Leadership accountability: the buck stops here “The Lord is a stronghold in the day of trouble; He knows those who take refuge in Him.” Nahum 1:7 • What is leadership accountability? • How does a leader make hard decisions as a result of accountability?
Leadership theory • You need to have led something before you can write about leadership • Leadership vs. management false dichotomy • Trust and competence Covey
Accountability is the basis for trust • How build trust: • Understanding what are we as leaders and followers accountable for. • Making decisions as a result of that accountability Leadership accountability
Planning Strategic Plan (Entire Organization) Where are we going? 5+ Years Increasing scope & time, horizon, decreasing detail Operational Plans (Divisions, Councils, Committees) 1 Year How will we get there? Tactical Plans (Teams, Individuals) Monthly, Weekly, Daily
At each planning level: Leaders and followers must know what they are accountable for • Sources of understanding accountability Federal and state law Board defined limitations and outcomes Parent and student expectations Faculty and staff expectations Accountability
decisions Strategic Operational Tactical • Accountability transcends leadership models • It operationalizes leadership • The second issue is making decisions • Failures most often occur at the operational—tactical levels
Two cases Failure to make decisions: • Leader doesn’t have access to the answer • Leader has access to the correct course of action
Leader doesn’t have the answer Lencioni(Five Temptations of a CEO) • Choose clarity over certainty • Choose results over status • Choose trust over invulnerability • Poor planning, bad information • Addressing the wrong issue • Failure in vision • Failure to have the right people on board
Leader has the correct COA • Lencioni(Five Temptations of a CEO) • Choose conflict over harmony • Choose accountability over popularity • Excess optimism, failure to face facts • Misplaced faith Pray, trust, act • Peer and supervisory pressure • Fear
Solutions • Accountability • Boards must hold leaders accountable • Staff must hold leaders accountable • Leadership must accept responsibility • Not be afraid • Can’t be everyone’s friend
Leadership development Empowering People • Include opportunities to make hard decisions • Allow leaders room to fail • Remove fear • Courage and integrity—primary criteria • Continual assessment
Leadership development Developing and Teaching* a curriculum designed to accomplish our mission Modeling* Christian leadership as a faculty, staff and administration Providing opportunities for our students to Practice* Christian leadership Recognizing* Christian leadership *Used by Christ to equip His followers
Conclusion • Accountability is a fundamental responsibility of the people we entrust with leadership • Practice and experience • Winnowing process
Covey, Stephen M.R., Speed of Trust, New York, Simon and Schuster (Free Press), 2006. Print. Lencioni, Patrick, The Five Temptations of a CEO, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1998. Print. Maxwell, John, ed., The Maxwell Leadership Bible, Nashville, Thomas Nelson Bibles, 2002. Print. Ricks, Thomas E., “General Failure”, The Atlantic, November 2012:98-109. Print and Web 12 November 2012. references