1 / 37

Raytown C-2 School District 2010 MAP/EOC Results

Raytown C-2 School District 2010 MAP/EOC Results. Core Curricular Areas September 27, 2010. Communication Arts, Math and Science Missouri Assessment Program (MAP) Grades 3-8. Scores are shown by “ cohort ” or by “ program ” Cohort: Same group of students year to year

violet-pope
Télécharger la présentation

Raytown C-2 School District 2010 MAP/EOC Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Raytown C-2 School District2010 MAP/EOC Results Core Curricular Areas September 27, 2010

  2. Communication Arts, Math and ScienceMissouri Assessment Program (MAP)Grades 3-8 • Scores are shown by “cohort” or by “program” • Cohort: Same group of students year to year • Program: Same grade level test given year to year • MAP Index Points are used to illustrate performance and to calculate our overall points on the APR (Annual Performance Report)

  3. Program DataCommunication Arts2009-3rd Grade 2010-3rd Grade(Different students each year)

  4. Cohort Data:Communication Arts2008-3rd Grade 2009-4th Grade 2010-5th Grade (Same students each year)

  5. Cohort Data:Communication Arts2008-4th Grade 2009-5th Grade 2010-6th Grade(Same students each year)

  6. Cohort Data:Communication Arts2008-5th Grade 2009-6th Grade 2010-7th Grade(Same students each year)

  7. Cohort Data:Communication Arts2008-6th Grade 2009-7th Grade 2010-8th Grade(Same students each year)

  8. Program DataMathematics2009-3rd Grade 2010-3rd Grade(Different Students each year)

  9. Cohort Data:Mathematics2008-3rd Grade 2009-4th Grade 2010-5th Grade(Same students each year)

  10. Comparative Data:Mathematics 2008-4th Grade 2009-5th Grade 2010-6th Grade(Same students each year)

  11. Cohort Data:Mathematics2008-5th Grade 2009-6th Grade 2010-7th Grade(Same students each year)

  12. Cohort Data:Mathematics 2008-6th Grade 2009-7th Grade 2010-8th Grade(Same students each year)

  13. Science MAP (5th/8th) and End-of-Course Exams in Biology, Algebra I, English II and American Government • Program data is presented from 2008-2010 • The Science MAP is administered in 5th and 8th Grades • End-of-Course Exams are administered at the end of each course. • Again, MAP Index points are used to illustrate performance.

  14. Program Data:5th Grade Science(Different students each year )

  15. Program Data:8th Grade Science (Different students each year)

  16. Program DataEOC Biology(Different students each year)

  17. Program Data:EOC Algebra I (Different students each year)

  18. Program Data:EOC English II (Different students each year)

  19. EOC American Government(Baseline year)

  20. Data Reported By Building • We are a total district team and depend on each other for total district results (APR). While some buildings showed significant improvement, others did not. All schools experienced improvement in at least one area. • The focus is on improvement and progress no matter where scores begin.

  21. Building: ElementaryGrade Three 2009-Grade Four 2010Communication Arts Cohort Data Blue Ridge: Up 6 points (723.3 – 729.4) Eastwood Hills: Down 1 point (695.5-694.7) Fleetridge: Up 7 points (723.2-730.1) Laurel Hills: Up 11 points (694.4-705.7) Little Blue: Baseline year (735.7 and 703.3) Norfleet: Up 14 points (727.1-741.1) Robinson: Down 3 points(768.6-765.5) Southwood: Same (732.9-732.1) Spring Valley: Up 14 points (723.10-736.9) Westridge: Up 17 points (715.7-733.3)

  22. Building: ElementaryGrade Four 2009-Grade Five 2010Communication Arts Cohort Data Blue Ridge: Up 4 points (740-743.7) Eastwood Hills: Down 14 points (731.7-717.6) Fleetridge: Down 1 point (755.6-754.8) Laurel Hills: Up 15 points (721.7-736.7) Little Blue: Baseline year (Grade Five: 757.10) Norfleet: Up 9 points (737-755.7) Robinson: Up 32 points (740.3-772.3) Southwood: Up 5 points (750.8-755.1) Spring Valley: Down 11 points (747.9-736.1) Westridge: Up 10 points (713.8-723.1)

  23. Building: Middle SchoolGrade Six 2009-Grade Seven 2010Communication Arts Cohort Data Raytown Middle: Down 14 points (748.1-734.8) Raytown South Middle: Up 10 points (729.4-738.8) Raytown Central Middle: Up 15 points (745.4-760)

  24. Building: Middle SchoolGrade Seven 2009-Grade Eight 2010Communication Arts Cohort Data Raytown Middle: Up 12 points (743.8-755.4) Raytown South Middle: Up 14 points (722.1-736.2) Raytown Central Middle: Up 5 points (762.6-767.3)

  25. Building: ElementaryGrade Three 2009-Grade Four 2010Mathematics Cohort Data Blue Ridge: Down 36 points (751.7-715.9) Eastwood Hills: Down 10 points (706.7-696.5) Fleetridge: Up 13 points (720.2-733.7) Laurel Hills: Up 17 points (691.7-708.5) Little Blue: Baseline year (724.3 and 716.4) Norfleet: Up 21 points (735.7-756.2) Robinson: Down 13 points (780-767.2) Southwood: Up 2 points (726.1-728.3) Spring Valley: Up 27 points (725.6-752.3) Westridge: Down 5 points (733.7-728.2)

  26. Building: ElementaryGrade Four 2009-Grade Five 2010Mathematics Cohort Data Blue Ridge: Up 3 points (736.9-739.4) Eastwood Hills: Down 4 points (730.2-726.5) Fleetridge: Up 5 points (744-759.5) Laurel Hills: Up 22 points (718.5-740.5) Little Blue: Baseline year (Grade Five: 765.7) Norfleet: Up 25 points (740.7-765) Robinson: Up 29 points (751.4-780) Southwood: Up 26 points (727-753.1) Spring Valley: Up 22 points (720.5-742.6) Westridge: Up 20 points (717.2-736.9)

  27. Building: Middle SchoolGrade Six 2009-Grade Seven 2010Mathematics Cohort Data Raytown Middle: Down 17 points (746.9-729.2) Raytown South Middle: Up 6 points (735.1-741.6) Raytown Central Middle: Down 7 points (759.4-751.1)

  28. Building: Middle SchoolGrade Seven 2009-Grade Eight 2010Mathematics Cohort Data Raytown Middle: Up 10 points (730-740.2) Raytown South Middle: Down 7 points (723.4-716.6) Raytown Central Middle: Up 6 points (750.9-756.5)

  29. Building: ElementaryGrade Five 2009-Grade Five 2010Science Program Data Blue Ridge: Same (733.3-733.8) Eastwood Hills: Up 17 points (700-717.6) Fleetridge: Up 31 points (725.3-756) Laurel Hills: Up 40 points (693.3-733.3) Little Blue: Baseline year (744.3) Norfleet: Up 7 points (752.3-760) Robinson: Up 35 points (744-778.5) Southwood: Down 7 points (727.4-720.4) Spring Valley: Up 7 points (716.3-723) Westridge: Down 7 points (723.3-716.9)

  30. Building: Middle SchoolGrade Eight 2009-Grade Eight 2010Science Program Data Raytown Middle: Up 2 points (717.3-719.1) Raytown South Middle: Up 2 points (705.4-707.5) Raytown Central Middle: Up 21 points (723.4-744)

  31. Middle School EOCAlgebra I Program Data2009-2010 Raytown Middle: Up 7 points (796.6-803.8) Raytown South Middle: Up 2 points (797-798.6) Raytown Central Middle: Up 15 points (817.4-832)

  32. High School EOCAlgebra I Program Data2009-2010(Different students each year) Raytown High: Up 7 points (710.9-727.7) Raytown South High: Up 9 points (704.4-713.8) NOTE: These scores may be incorrect due to administration error

  33. High School EOCBiology Program Data2009-2010(Different students each year) Raytown High: Down 22 points (755.7-734.1) Raytown South High: Up 2 points (725.3-726.8) NOTE: These scores may be incorrect due to administration error

  34. High School EOCEnglish II Program Data2009-2010(Different students each year) Raytown High: English II: Up 17 points (757-773.7) Raytown South High: English II: Same (760.7-760.4) NOTE: These scores may be incorrect due to administration error

  35. High School EOCAmerican Government Program Data2010 Baseline Raytown High: 722.3 Raytown South High: 692.4 NOTE: These scores may be incorrect due to administration error

  36. 2010 APRScore: 11 • All areas MET with the exception of: • 3-5 Mathematics (Missed by 4 status points) • ACT (Missed by one point) • Attendance (Missed by 6 tenths of a point)

  37. What’s Next? • District and Building Professional Development areas • PLC/Collaboration • Differentiation/Structure • Assessment/Data (Data Collection) • District PD classes • Evaluation/Collection of Work Samples • eSource

More Related