1 / 37

Preparation for D 0  K p analysis

Preparation for D 0  K p analysis. Andrea Dainese, INFN Legnaro work with Andrea Rossi, Padova University. Analysis Scheme. Event reconstruction (RAW  ESD  AOD). Charm “production” (ESD/AOD  AOD for D’s). D 0 signal selection (using PID and geom/kinem cuts).

vlad
Télécharger la présentation

Preparation for D 0  K p analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Preparation for D0Kp analysis Andrea Dainese, INFN Legnaro work with Andrea Rossi, Padova University ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  2. Analysis Scheme Event reconstruction (RAW  ESD  AOD) Charm “production” (ESD/AOD  AOD for D’s) D0 signal selection (using PID and geom/kinem cuts) Invariant mass analysis and significance maximization (in bins of pt, y, f  FRP…) Correction for efficiencies, acceptance, BR Cross section normalisation ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  3. MC Sample for Tools Development • 5×106 pp events at 14 TeV (PYTHIA “PhysicsRun” cocktail): • 85% pp min. bias w/o heavy quarks • ~14% pp (MSEL=1) with charm, pthard-binned • ~1% pp (MSEL=1) with beauty, pthard-binned • ALICE baseline: cross sections from NLO pQCD with “best guess” set of parameters • Fast production: TPC param + full ITS, no TOF, no TRD • Generated in Legnaro, Torino, CNAF in April06 ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  4. Analysis Scheme Event reconstruction (RAW  ESD  AOD) Charm “production” (ESD/AOD  AOD for D’s) D0 signal selection (using PID and geom/kinem cuts) Invariant mass analysis and significance maximization (in bins of pt, y, f  FRP…) Correction for efficiencies, acceptance, BR Cross section normalisation ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  5. Event reconstruction (RAW  ESD  AOD) • Reconstruction in the barrel • track parameters with and without primary vertex constraint • Alignment correction performed • ITS: expected residual misalignment per module (talk by A.Jacholkowski) • SPD: 10 mm (r, rf), 20 mm (z) + rotations/tilts • SDD: 20 mm (r, rf, z) + rotations/tilts • SSD: 13 mm (r, rf), 10 mm (z) + rotations/tilts • different alignment parameters to be used in MC for syst. error evaluation • Primary vertex reco (crucial for heavy flavour analyses!) • Standard AOD (talk by M.Oldenburg), extracted from ESD AliAODEvent - Part of the event Meta Data - Global event information charged tracks vertices (V0,...) ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  6. Primary vertex from tracks (talk on Friday) K,L-decay primary D-decay B-decay warning: 90% of tracks from D decay used to find primary vertex ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  7. s of d0 distribution for primaries s of d0/error(d0) distr. for primaries s [mm] bias! bias! Track impact parameter measurement in pp collisions • Track impact parameter resolution: sd0 = svtxstrack • Vertex reconstructed from tracks • Bias (underestimate of d0) if the considered track is used for vertex fit: ➔primary vertex has to be reconstructed for each D candidate excluding its daughters: time-consuming! ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  8. Effect of ITS misalignment on d0 resolution • Impact parameter resol: strack = ascatter/pt  bmeas  cmisalign • Use ITS toy model • no geometry • just gaussian smearings • Determine the cmisalign parameter for different misalign. scenarios • Estimate being repeated with full AliRoot simu/reco chain • Effect on D0 significance being studied ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  9. Analysis Scheme Event reconstruction (RAW  ESD  AOD) Charm “production” (ESD/AOD  AOD for D’s) D0 signal selection (using PID and geom/kinem cuts) Invariant mass analysis and significance maximization (in bins of pt, y, f  FRP…) Correction for efficiencies, acceptance, BR Cross section normalisation ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  10. Production of D0 K-p+ candidates Analysis with opposite-charge track pairs • all tracks with 6 ITS points (possibly) • two selection steps: • single-track cuts, to reduce combinatorics (CPU time & disk space) --- secondary vertex reconstruction (talk on Friday) --- • candidate cuts • implemented in AliD0toKpiandAliD0toKpiAnalysisclasses • being adapted to AOD / AliAnalysisTask scheme ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  11. CharmAOD: Classes Layout done to be done AliAODVirtualParticle AliAODRecoDecay AliAODRecoDecayHF AliAODv0 (already exists; PWG2 agreed to adapt it to this scheme) AliAODRecoDecayHF2Prong AliAODRecoDecayHF3Prong ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  12. CharmAOD scheme (with F.Prino) single-track cuts on pt and d0(pt) need common cuts for all analyses (to be studied) build all (+,-) pairs and compute secondary vtx for D+,Ds+,Lc+, D*+ for D0Kp loop on all tracks (+ & -): 1) build triplets, create AliAODRecoDecayHF3Prong, apply reco cuts (common for the 3 particles?) 2) if pair has D0 mass, attach track and create a D*+ candidate create AliAODRecoDecayHF2Prong apply D0 reco cuts on d0d0, cosqpointing and mass for D0Kppp store loop on all tracks (+ & -) … create AliAODRecoDecayHF … store store ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  13. Analysis Scheme Event reconstruction (RAW  ESD  AOD) Charm “production” (ESD/AOD  AOD for D’s) D0 signal selection (using PID and geom/kinem cuts) Invariant mass analysis and significance maximization (in bins of pt, y, f  FRP…) Correction for efficiencies, acceptance, BR Cross section normalisation ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  14. Selection Variables & PID • Variables: • (pt of decay tracks) • DCA: distance of closest approach between the two tracks • cosq*: cosine of decay angle • d0xd0: product of the two tracks rf impact parameters • cosqpointing: cosine of pointing angle • 3 PID “modes” considered: • no PID • K id required • (p,p), (K,K) pairs rejected ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  15. Extraction of signal raw yield:Invariant mass analysis • Here, 5 million pp events (1/200 of 1-year’s statistics) pt > 0 “PPR cuts” ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  16. RS/TS~0.25 RS/TS~0.25 RS/TS~0.30 RS/TS~0.20 RS/TS~0.15 PID: (p,p), (K,K) rejected work by C.Ivan Extraction of signal raw yield:Invariant mass analysis • Beware of reflections: no PID Reflections Combinatorial ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  17. fit side-bands with expo: initial expo parameters • fit everything with expo + gauss with constraint on total integral Extraction of signal raw yield:Invariant mass analysis • Two possible approaches: • direct fit w/o bkg subtraction (only if large S/B, > 5-10%?) • background subtraction with event mixing + fit • Direct fit tried: exponential + gaussian ------------ From Fit ---------------------- Total S integral (+- 3s) = 39.7 +- 9.3 S/B (+- 3s) = 85% SGNC as S/sS (+- 3s) = 4.3 (58 for 109 evts) SGNC as S/S+B (+- 3s) = 4.3 ---------- From Simulation ------------ Total S integral (+- 3s) = 39.5 S/B (+- 3s) = 90% SGNC as S/S+B (+- 3s) = 4.3 (59 for 109 evts) ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  18. 2<pt<3 GeV/c 5<pt<8 GeV/c 3<pt<5 GeV/c 0<pt<1 GeV/c Significance maximization • Optimize cut values in pt bins: maximize significance in cut-variables space (e.g. 4D space) • Example (work by A.Rossi): ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  19. PPR sS/S=1/SGNC Results (scaled to 109 events) • Checked performance w/o PID: not much worsening, but have to tighten cuts (larger systematic errors?) ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  20. Analysis Scheme Event reconstruction (RAW  ESD  AOD) Charm “production” (ESD/AOD  AOD for D’s) D0 signal selection (using PID and geom/kinem cuts) Invariant mass analysis and significance maximization (in bins of pt, y, f  FRP…) Correction for efficiencies, acceptance, BR Cross section normalisation ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  21. Corrections & Errors:Beauty feed-down (~10%) • HOW? • Monte Carlo with state-of-the-art pQCD input • use measurements from ALICE (from single m, then e) • SYSTEMATIC ERROR: uncertainty on b-bbar cross section from theory (1) or data (2). For (1), the syst. error estimated to be ~8-10% according MNR; should be smaller according FONLL ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  22. Corrections & Errors:Acceptance, Reco & Selection Efficiency • HOW? • Embedding of MC signal in real events, and calculate all corrections in one go (selected  in-acceptance). Average correction in {pt, y} grid • NEEDED: tuned MC (good descr. of tracking effs and resols). d0 resol. is crucial, must be evaluated from data vs pt, q, PID, NITSclusters • SYSTEMATIC ERROR: - compare weights in different runs, and with the two field orientations (+z and -z) - check stability of extracted yield VS variation of cuts - repeat weights calculations (MC) with different sets for alignment corrections ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  23. Evaluation of d0 res. from data Evaluation of d0 resolution: d0 distribution is dominated by primary particles for |d0|<d0MAX Fit in this range provides the resolution, to be then compared with that in AliRoot ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  24. pt 0.4 GeV/c primaries all A.Rossi ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  25. pt 1.1 GeV/c primaries all A.Rossi ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  26. pt 4.5 GeV/c primaries all A.Rossi ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  27. Fit range for evaluation of resolution limited statistics! d0MAX / s • Conclusions: • a fit of all tracks’ d0 distr. in the range ~ (-3s, +3s) allows to extract the d0 resolution • resolution is a convolution of track position resolution, primary vertex resolution, misalignment effects • Open points: • devise method to separate track and vertex contributions • study other methods (e.g. using cosmic m crossing all detector) A.Rossi ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  28. Summary • Performed realistic D0 analysis on 5 million pp events (PDC06-like sample) • First version of invariant mass fit • Developed multi-dimensional SGNC maximization method • Results (signal SGNC) compatible with PPR ones • To be repeated asap on PDC06 events • Long TO-DO list • port analysis to AOD/AliAnalysisTask framework • effect of misalignment • procedure for corrections • ... ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  29. EXTRA SLIDES ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  30. First pp data: machine scenario • b* ~ 10 m (will be 0.5 m for Pb-Pb) • Bunch spread: • transverse sbunch (b*) ~ 70 mm, long. sbunch ~ 7.5 cm • Vertex spread: • transverse svertex =sbunch/2~50 mm, long. svertex = 5.3 cm • Luminosity: (1/s2vertex) ~1030 cm-2s-1(70 kHz for spp = 70 mb) • Revol’s scenario: 20x10h ~5-10x107 min. bias events • Subsystems directly used for D0 analysis: ITS, TPC, TOF • Assumption: TPC, full ITS, half TOF (-0.9<h<0.9, Df=p ?) First pp data: detector scenario ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  31. Candidate cuts (1) ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  32. Corrections & Errors:Acceptance, Reco & Selection Efficiency Selection efficiency: from selected to reconstructed signal Reconstruction eff.: from reconstructed to in-acceptance Acceptance: from in-acceptance to dN/dy at y=0 central Pb-Pb central Pb-Pb ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  33. Beauty feed-down • Feed-down can be up to 15% after selection • Can use upper cut on |d0| to control it • To subtract it: • use simulation with state-of-the-art pQCD c and b predictions for LHC • later, use b cross section measured at LHC • later, use d0 of D0 to estimate feed-down ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  34. Simulation & Reconstruction • Detectors: full transport in ITS, track references at TPC Rin • Primary Vertex: b* = 10 m sx = sy = 50 mm, as expected for the 2007 run • Reconstruction: • TPC tracking response parametrized (old parametrization from 2002  conservative efficiencies and resolutions) • Slow Points in ITS • z of vertex from SPD • Kalman in ITS with AliITStrackerV2 • full vertex reco with tracks NOT INCLUDED (to be done before analysis) ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  35. TPC parametrization TPC param / full tracking full tracking TPC param full tracking TPC param full tracking TPC param ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  36. Reco & Sele TO-DOs TO DO for single-track cuts (pt and d0): - estimate CPU time, signal and background efficiency vs cut values - estimate cut values compatible with “final” candidate cuts TO DO for secondary vertex: implement vertex fitting with errors and c2 (as done for primary) TO DO for inv. mass analysis: prepare fit procedure/code; take into account reflections in fit; background subtraction IN PROGRESS, talk on Friday IN PROGRESS ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

  37. Corrections & Errors TO-DOs TO DO for beauty feed-down: - define procedure to generate MC with B -> D0, and reweight results according to a given pQCD dsb/dpt - define procedure to use ALICE single m measurement to infer B production in the barrel TO DO for systematic errors: - define procedure for embedding (how many {pt,y} bins? needed MC stats? which real events? vs dNch/dy? vs zvertex?) - define procedure to evaluate d0 resol. from data IN PROGRESS ALICE Physics Week, Muenster, 13.02.2007 Andrea Dainese

More Related