1 / 23

ITALY - Case Example

ITALY - Case Example. EE Policy measure : INFORMATION Category: EE CERTIFICATES GENT Meeting- April 2003. NEW POLICY FRAMEWORK-1. TWO TWIN MINISTERIAL DECREES ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY (24 April 2001) Mandatory quantitative energy savings targets at national level ( Primary energy )

waldo
Télécharger la présentation

ITALY - Case Example

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ITALY - Case Example EE Policy measure: INFORMATION Category: EE CERTIFICATES GENT Meeting- April 2003

  2. NEW POLICY FRAMEWORK-1 TWO TWIN MINISTERIAL DECREES ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY (24 April 2001) • Mandatory quantitative energy savings targets at national level (Primary energy) • Specific targets on each Electric Energy and Gas Distributor

  3. NEW POLICY FRAMEWORK-2 • Target annual compliance control by Regulatory Authority of Electricity and Gas (AEEG) - sanctions for non compliance • Energy Efficiency Certificates (EEC) certificates issued by AEEG to Distributors and Escos • Institution of an EEC market

  4. National targets • Mandatory quantitative energy savingstargets at national level(Primary energy) Year Targets [Mtoe/yr] Electricity Gas 2002 0,10 0,10 2003 0,50 0,40 2004 0,90 0,70 2005 1,20 1,00 2006 1,60 1,30 • At least 50% via a reduction of electricity and gas end-uses • Implementation: Authority for Electricity and Gas (AEEG)

  5. Distributors’ targets -1 • Specific targets on each Distributor • Threshold: >100.000 customers as at 31.12.2001 • Apportioned on the basis of the quantity of electricity/gas distributed to final customers compared to the national total, in the previous year • 50 % minimum via reduction of electricity and gas consumption • Specific regional targets can be added by Regional Administrations

  6. Distributors’ targets -2 • Annual compliance control by AEEG • Sanctions for non compliance (Proportional and in any case greater than investments needed to compensate the non-compliance)

  7. Energy Efficiency certificates (EEC) • Issued by AEEG (unit: tep) • To distributors and ESCOs • Ex-post and on annual basis after verification of energy savings achieved • Tradable via bilateral contracts or in the EEC market • Banking allowed over five years

  8. ELIGIBLE PROJECTS Targets have to be achieved via the implementation of energy savings projects • Only demand-side actions • Illustrative list of 14 classes of projects (with more than 35 sub-classes) • Maximum lifetime: 5 year • Supply-side project not eligible

  9. Actions in charge of Distributors -1 • Prepare an optimised plane for projects/programs implementation (according to Autority indications) taking into account costs/benefits evaluations • Choose third society for agreements (Escos, commercial apparata networks..)

  10. Actions in charge of Distributors -2 • Organise promotion actions towards clients (information, incentives, financing..) • Organise the collection of the required data for energy savings evaluation

  11. Actions in charge of Distributors -3 • Document the results and submit the documentation to the Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas for certification • Negotiate purchase or selling energy efficiency certificates in the new EEC market

  12. CASE DESCRIPTION -1 • Program sponsor: Energy Distributors/Escos • Dates: Start 2001 End 2006 • Market actors: End Users (Industrial, Residential, Commercial)

  13. CASE DESCRIPTION -2 • Technologies Targeted: see table • Policy measure employed: Information- EE certificates (+ subsequent other measures: incentives, financing...) • Status of documentation: ex-ante evaluation methods defined, balanced data not yet available

  14. EVALUATION METHODS -1 Three valuation approaches: • DEFAULT APPROACH (ex-ante energy savings evaluation - no on-field measurements) • ENGINEERING APPROACH (some on-field measurements required) • ENERGY MONITORING PLAN (subjected to pre-approval)

  15. EVALUATION METHODS -2 Consideration of: • free riders • delivery mechanism • persistence of savings

  16. BASELINES • SUBSTITUTIONS • NEW INSTALLATIONS

  17. BASELINES-Substitutions • Hypothesis: savings evaluated for the same given energetic service • substitutedTechnology • more diffusedTechnology • representative averageTechnology in use

  18. BASELINES-New installations Energy savings=  Energy Consumption between: • better existing technology /immediately lower technology(ex. Boilers 4 and 3 stars) • better existing technology / average technology on the market or more diffused technology(ex. Refrigerators, dish-washers..)

  19. Programs /ex-ante evaluation methods

  20. Programs /ex-ante evaluation methods

  21. Programs /ex-ante evaluation methods

  22. INDICATORS -1 • SPECIFIC GROSS PRIMARY ENERGY SAVINGS SGprE[tep/year /physical unit] • Gross Savings to be corrected in order to take into account: • natural trends of diffusion • impact of delivery mechanism different than installation • persistence of savings (proposed 95-100% with respect to the previous year) • life cycle of energy consuming apparata (generally non considered for long life apparata)

  23. INDICATORS -2 Gross savings to be corrected by at least two factors: • a)free riders • b)delivery mechanism (i = i th delivery method) [a and b to be defined after consultation] • Net Specific Primary Energy Savings (i th delivery method ) NSprE = SGprE (1 – a – bi)

More Related