1 / 17

More Wirescanner Results

This study presents detailed simulations and measurements of beam loss monitors (BLMs) and wire scanners (WS) focusing on their expected energy deposition. Various wire types (50 µm tungsten and 10 µm carbon) were examined under different voltages. Results showed linearity in BLM and WS signals at low conditions, with wider linear ranges for wire scanners. Analyzing correlations between BLM and WS signals reveals important insights into signal behavior and potential improvements in calibration for better accuracy in beam monitoring.

wei
Télécharger la présentation

More Wirescanner Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. More Wirescanner Results Simulations Development of the e.m. cascade Expected energy deposition Measurements Beam sizes Correlations beam loss monitors–wirescanners Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  2. FLUKA simulations Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  3. Simulation: 50 µm W WS scintillators wire BLM scintillators beam Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  4. Simulation: 10 µm W Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  5. Simulation: 10 µm C Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  6. Relative energy deposition (scan with wire 21SEED.VER) 50 µm W 10 µm W deposited energy (GeV/cm3/primary particle) 10 µm C Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  7. Measurements Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  8. Beam Sizes 50 µm W @ 2.0 V 10 µm W @ 2.0 V 10 µm C @ 3.0 V Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  9. Correlation BLM-WS 1L 3L 5L UND 5R 1R 3R 10 µm carbon wire, wirescanner PM at 3.5 V, BLM 3R low WS signal, low BLM signal: linear behavior Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  10. Correlation BLM-WS 1L 3L 5L UND 5R 1R 3R 10 µm carbon wire, wirescanner PM at 3.5 V, BLM 5L low WS signal, higher BLM signal: BLM nonlinearity Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  11. Correlation BLM-WS 50 µm tungsten wire, wirescanner PM at 2.0 V, BLM 3R higher WS signal, high BLM signal: BLM nonlinearity+WS nonlinearity? Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  12. Correlation BLM-WS 50 µm tungsten wire, wirescanner PM at 2.5 V, BLM 3R higher wirescanner PM voltage: WS nonlinearity less distinct Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  13. First Conclusions • BLMs and WSs are linear for low signals (BLM signal < 0.1) • WSs have wider linear range than BLMs • Carbon: signals entirely in WS linear range • Reduction of WS light input will improve linearity Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  14. One more thing... Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  15. Relative Calibration signal per charge density (a.u. / (nC/mm)) Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  16. Relative Calibration relative signal strength Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

  17. Relative Calibration relative signal strength Lars Fröhlich/Eduard Prat, MPY

More Related