SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Chapter 9: Probabilistic Scheduling Models

weldon avatar
18 diapositives · 515 Views · Sep 01, 2012

Chapter 9: Probabilistic Scheduling Models. project evaluation and review technique ( PERT ) Simulation. reflects PROBABILISTIC nature of durations assumes BETA distribution same as CPM except THREE duration estimates optimistic most likely pessimistic. PERT.

Chapter 9: Probabilistic Scheduling Models - slide 1
01 / 18Chapter 9: Probabilistic Scheduling Models
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 9: Probabilistic Scheduling Models
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Chapter 9: Probabilistic Scheduling Models project evaluation and review technique (PERT) Simulation

  2. reflects PROBABILISTIC nature of durations assumes BETA distribution same as CPM except THREE duration estimates optimistic most likely pessimistic PERT

  3. a = optimistic duration estimate m = most likely duration estimate b = pessimistic duration estimate expected duration: variance: PERT Calculation

  4. activity duration predecessor te A requirements analysis 2/3/6 weeks - 3.33 B programming 3/6/10 weeks A 6.17 C get hardware 1/1/2 week A 1.17 D train users 3/3/3 weeks B, C 3.00 CRITICAL PATH: A-B-D EXPECTED DURATION: 3.33+6.17+3=12.5 VARIANCE: {(6-2)/6}^2 +{(10-3)/6}^2+{(3-3)/6}^2=1.805 STD = 1.344 PERT Example

  5. IF YOU ASSUME INDEPENDENCE the variance of any path = sum of activity variances for all activities on that path NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED variance of the PROJECT = variance of the CRITICAL PATH if more than one critical path, PROJECT VARIANCE=largest of CRITICAL PERT Path Variance

  6. since NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED can estimate probability of completing project on time can estimate probability of completing project by any target date if critical path expected = 9.5, STD=1.354 target=10 Z=(10-9.5)/1.354 = .369 probability = .644 PERT Variance

  7. so what do you mean by optimistic, pessimistic? value you expect to be exceeded at a probability level and not exceeded at 1-a probability PROBLEM: estimating the MOST LIKELY duration of most things is hard asking estimators to come up with “What won’t be exceeded 95% of the time” is blowing in the wind. PERT Estimates

  8. a number of methods exist Gantt chart provides good visual network shows precedence well CPM identifies critical activities PERT reflects probability SIMULATION more accurate (still need data) Network Scheduling Methods

  9. Why Simulate? uncertainty tool for study of expected performance for uncertainty, complexity

  10. develop an abstract model of a system CPM is a precedence model whenever uncertain events are encountered, use random numbers to determine specific outcomes keep score (describe the DISTRIBUTION of possible outcomes) what is simulation?

  11. CPM - sort out complexity (assumes certainty) PERT - considers uncertainty but assumes an unrealistic distribution SIMULATION set up model run it over and over keep score of the outcomes (any one of which are possible) project management tools

  12. start all activities as soon as you can need to know when all predecessors done = start time duration is probabilistic (described by a distribution) use random number to determine specific duration from all possible outcomes finish time = start time + duration CPM model

  13. Excel Model

  14. Beta - assumed by PERT; mathematically convenient Normal requires symmetry, infinite limits Triangular - more flexible than normal, close approximation exponential - not likely lognormal - might fit, but inflexible distributions

  15. Can generate as many samples as desired Can calculate probability by count do NOT have to assume any distribution count is easier, more accurate than normal formulas Simulation is often the means used to generate distribution tables Output Analysis

  16. simulation provides greater accuracy than PERT simulation the most flexible analytic tool why should a manager care?

  17. Project durations have high degrees of uncertainty PERT a probabilistic form of CPM Sound idea – reflects uncertain durations Not much more accurate – too rigid Simulation a much more flexible and appropriate tool for modeling uncertainty Summary