1 / 15

The Learning Chatbot

The Learning Chatbot. Bonnie Chantarotwong IMS-256 Fall 2006. What is wrong with state of the art chatbots?. They are repetitive They are predictable simple pattern matching & set response They have no memory can lead to circular conversations They don’t sound like real people.

westbrook
Télécharger la présentation

The Learning Chatbot

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Learning Chatbot Bonnie Chantarotwong IMS-256 Fall 2006

  2. What is wrong with state of the art chatbots? • They are repetitive • They are predictable • simple pattern matching & set response • They have no memory • can lead to circular conversations • They don’t sound like real people

  3. Proposed Solution • Train chatbots on a corpora of conversations in order to mimic a given personality

  4. Filtering the training corpus • Need a lot of conversations containing query screen name • Eliminate undesirable data • phone numbers • Addresses • sensitive gossip • Eliminate highly technical data • since most tech problems are very specific, unless the bot was trained on a newsgroup, learned responses are not likely to be useful for tech support

  5. Parsing the training corpus • Extract messages from HTML • Group together consecutive messages by the same screen name • Simplify prompt messages • !!!!!!!??????? -> !? • Ohhhhhhhhhhhh! -> ohh! • WhATz uP?? -> whatz up? • hahahahaha -> haha • Break prompts into word sequences (eliminating stop words) • I tookthecat toavet -> [i, took, cat, to, vet]

  6. Constructing the CFD • CFD conditions are prompt words • FD samples are string responses, with numeric count indicating strength of correlation • Example: • Cfd[‘sleep’].sorted_samples() -> [“sleep is the best thing ever”, “are you tired?”, “maybe after I eat.”, “hang on a sec.”]

  7. Constructing the CFD Simple Concept: If a prompt is n words long, then each word is 1/n likely to have caused the response i 1/3 Can we put mittens on it? 1/3 want 1/3 kitten 1/3 1/3 Me too, I’m hungry. food 1/3 1/6 they 1/6 1/6 What kind did they have? had 1/6 good 1/6 1/6 at restaurant Original Conversation:A: I wantakittenB: Can we put mittens on it?A: I want foodB: Me too, I’m hungryA: They had good food attherestaurantB: What kind did they have?

  8. Using the CFD Problem • Each word in a prompt is not equally likely to have caused the response • More common words (such as ‘I’) are less indicative of meaning Solution • Take into account the commonality of the word over all conversations • Divide the weight of the word/response pair by the weight sum over all samples for that word • Rare words are weighted more; using a dynamic scale • This improved quality of bot responses greatly!

  9. Using the CFD - Example CFD: Cfd[‘i’] = [(“Can we put mittens on it?”, 1/3), (“Me too, I’m hungry”, 1/3)] Sum: 2/3 Cfd[‘want’] = [(“Can we put mittens on it?”, 1/3), (“Me too, I’m hungry”, 1/3)] Sum: 2/3 Cfd[‘kitten’] = [(“Can we put mittens on it?”, 1/3)] Sum: 1/3 Cfd[‘food’] = [ (“Me too, I’m hungry”, 1/3), (“What kind of food did they have?”, 1/6)] Sum: 1/2 Cfd[‘they’] = [ (“What kind of food did they have?”, 1/6)] Sum: 1/6 Cfd[‘had’] = [ (“What kind of food did they have?”, 1/6)] Sum: 1/6 Cfd[‘good’] = [ (“What kind of food did they have?”, 1/6)] Sum: 1/6 Cfd[‘at’] = [ (“What kind of food did they have?”, 1/6)] Sum: 1/6 Cfd[‘restaurant’] = [ (“What kind of food did they have?”, 1/6)] Sum: 1/6 Responses (“how is your kitten?”) = [(“Can we put mittens on it?”, (1/3 / 1/3) = 1)] Responses (“the food was good”) = [(“Me too, I’m hungry”, (1/3 / 1/2) = 2/3), (“What kind of food did they have?”, (1/6 / 1/2 + 1/6 / 1/6) = 4/3]

  10. Using the CFD Responses (“the food was good”) = [(“Me too, I’m hungry”, (1/3 / 1/2) = 2/3), (“What kind of food did they have?”, (1/6 / 1/2 + 1/6 / 1/6) = 4/3] • Given the CFD, the response to any prompts containing ‘food’ and ‘good’ will give back “What kind of food did they have?” • Problem: This can lead to redundancy • A: The food was good • B: What kind of food did they have? • A: Didn’t you think the food was good? • B: What kind of food did they have? • Solution: Store an FD of used responses, and don’t use them again • A: The food was good • B:What kind of food did they have? • A: Didn’t you think the food was good? • B: Me too I’m hungry

  11. What if we have no responses? Because: • We’ve never encountered any of the prompt words • We’ve used up all relevant responses We can: • Find a random response • Enhance randomness by favoring unlikely responses (near the end of association lists) to reduce redundancy • Fabricate a response based on pattern matching • Select a response from a default list of responses (i.e. “Lets talk about something else”, “I don’t know anything about that” * All my bots implement 1 & 2, and one bot (bonnie) also implements 3 & 4

  12. Interactive Webpages are not trivial • Especially if you want to retain some “memory” of the past • First CGI problem: A new bot is created with every web prompt - all memory is lost • Solution: • Write all bot state changes to a file, including used responses. • Run this file with every prompt, and reset it when a new conversation starts • The bot loads the huge CFD & all state changes from scratch with EVERY call. Slow, but works.

  13. Interactive Webpages are not trivial Memory = Self-modifying code

  14. Interactive Webpages are not trivial Memory = Self-modifying code

  15. Demo http://ischool.berkeley.edu/~bonniejc/

More Related